Home Blog Page 1001

TNT Sports Adds Andre Agassi To French Open Coverage: Report

0

TNT Sports begins the first year of a multi-year arrangement with the French Open next month, as the network will be paying over 600 million dollars for the two-week event every May. According to The New York Times, TNT Sports has reached an agreement with eight-time Grand Slam winner Andre Agassi to serve as a studio commentator for the tournament.

Agassi, a one-time French Open winner in 1999, has worked on a very limited basis in television since his retirement from the sport following the 2006 US Open. Now, he joins what is expected to be TNT’s lead commentary team, which will feature Brian Anderson and John McEnroe.

Meanwhile, The New York Times reports that TNT has yet to comment on the matter.

Widely regarded as one of the greatest American-born tennis players of all time, Agassi boasts a career singles record of 870-274 with 60 career titles. Turning pro at the age of 16 in 1986, he quickly made a name for himself, winning his first top-level singles title in 1987 at the Sul American Open. By the time he turned 18, Agassi had already climbed into the top 25 players in the world rankings.

Although Agassi has done some television work previously for the Tennis Channel, he has never held a consistent broadcasting role. Instead, much of his post-tennis career has been dedicated to philanthropy, particularly through his Andre Agassi Charitable Association, which he founded in 1994.

Additionally, The New York Times notes that TNT Sports had discussions with other American-born players, including Jim Courier and Lindsay Davenport, about joining the French Open coverage. In the end, TNT Sports announced that Adam Lefkoe will serve as the studio host for the tournament.

Previously, the French Open was housed on NBC, which had aired the tournament since 1983. However, with this new 10-year agreement, TNT Sports will now serve as the lead network for coverage, averaging $65 million per year—a significant increase from the $12 million annually that the French Tennis Federation had been receiving from NBC and Tennis Channel for U.S. rights. As part of the deal, TNT will provide primary coverage, while additional matches will air on TBS and truTV. Furthermore, every match from the tournament will also be available for streaming on Max.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.

Sam Rosen, John Davidson to Reunite for Rangers-Flyers on TNT

0

Hockey Hall of Famer and longtime play-by-play voice of the New York Rangers, Sam Rosen, announced back in August 2024 that he would be stepping away from calling Rangers games at the conclusion of this season. For 40 years, Rosen has been on the call, entertaining Rangers fans through the highest of highs and the lowest of lows.

Now, as the regular season nears its end this month, Rosen will call the April 9 contest against the Philadelphia Flyers alongside former analyst John Davidson. Notably, the broadcast will be carried live on TNT from Madison Square Garden. Vince Mercogliano of USA TODAY was first to report the possibility of Rosen and Davidson reuniting on the airwaves.

Davidson worked alongside Rosen on the call of New York Rangers games from 1986 until 2006. Over the years, their chemistry became a defining aspect of Rangers broadcasts.

More recently, the Rangers honored Rosen before the team’s March 22 contest against the Vancouver Canucks. Davidson was in attendance, along with Phil Esposito and Rosen’s current broadcast partner, Joe Micheletti. Although Davidson had not worked a game with Rosen in nearly 20 years, he has remained active in the league, currently serving in a senior advisor role with the Columbus Blue Jackets.

Rosen and Davidson are most remembered for their final call of the 1994 Stanley Cup Final, which marked the last time the New York Rangers won the Stanley Cup. To this day, that iconic broadcast on MSG Network remains the highest-rated broadcast in the network’s history.

Looking ahead, with next season marking the 100th in New York Rangers history, Rosen has already stated that while he may be retired, he will still be involved with the organization in some capacity.

Rosen’s journey with the Rangers began in the 1977-78 season when he served as the backup to Marv Albert on the radio and Jim Gordon on the television side. Later, in September 1982, he signed his first full-time contract with the network, initially working as the MSG Networks studio host before becoming the Rangers’ main television broadcaster in the 1984-85 season.

Throughout his tenure at MSG Networks, Rosen has had three main broadcast partners. He worked his first two seasons with Phil Esposito, then spent the next 19 years alongside John Davidson, and, most recently, has worked 19 seasons with Joe Micheletti.

Beyond his broadcasting career, Rosen has received numerous accolades. He was inducted into the Hockey Hall of Fame after winning the prestigious Foster Hewitt Memorial Award in 2016. Additionally, he was honored by the National Jewish Sports Hall of Fame in 2008 and, most recently, was inducted into the New York State Hockey Hall of Fame this past summer.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.

ESPN Platforms Average 2.9 Million Viewers for NCAA WCBB Elite 8

0

The regional semifinals within the NCAA Division I Women’s Basketball Tournament averaged 2.9 million viewers across ESPN networks, which marks the second-highest average on record for the company. Yet the game broadcasts are down by 53% from last year when the Elite 8 round averaged 6.2 million viewers, but up by 34% from two years ago, according to Jon Lewis of Sports Media Watch. As it pertains to the ABC broadcast network specifically, the entity averaged 3.2 million viewers for its game broadcasts, representative of a 17% year-over-year proliferation.

ABC was the broadcast home of the third most-watched Elite 8 game on record when the LSU Tigers faced the UCLA Bruins. The matchup averaged 3.4 million viewers on ABC, ESPN+ and Disney+ with a peak of 4.4 million viewers, ultimately leading the way against other contests in the round. The game between the Duke Blue Devils and South Carolina Gamecocks finished second with an average of 3.1 million viewers across the aforementioned entities, finishing as the fourth most-watched Elite 8 game on record. This matchup between interstate rivals peaked with a total of 4.1 million viewers.

Games within the regional semifinals broadcast on ESPN averaged a collective 2.6 million viewers, indicating the second-best Elite 8 performance on record for the network. The game between the UConn Huskies and USC Trojans averaged 3 million viewers on the network and attained a peak of 3.4 million viewers. Although it placed sixth among the most-viewed Elite 8 games on record, the game was down 55% from the previous year. The Texas Longhorns and TCU Horned Frogs had a similar fate, averaging 2.3 million viewers and securing the ninth most-viewed Elite 8 game on record with an 81% year-over-year decline. The Monday night game peaked with 3.2 million viewers.

Through the regional semifinals round of the tournament, ESPN is averaging 967,000 viewers for its game presentations, representing a 31% decline from the presentation last year. Prior to this round, ESPN averaged 1.7 million viewers for its presentation of the Sweet 16 and presented four of the 10 most-watched games in the round of all time. As a whole, the company is up 47% in average viewership through the Elite 8 round from two years ago and has accrued 5 billion total minutes viewed thus far, marking the second-highest total at this point on record.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.

UFL Opening Weekend Viewership Down Significantly From Inaugural Season

0

The UFL kicked off its second season of spring football over the weekend on FOX and ESPN. As the league enters the season, a looming players’ strike remains a major concern, with no labor contract yet established. While the focus for many who follow the UFL was on whether the season would even begin, the television viewership numbers are now officially out. Unfortunately, it was a rough start for the second-year football league.

With games airing on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, the first contest featured the St. Louis Battlehawks taking on the Houston Roughnecks on FOX. This matchup drew an average of 690,000 viewers. However, this marks a significant decline from last year’s first game of the inaugural season, which averaged 1.181 million viewers.

Meanwhile, Saturday and Sunday’s contests also struggled, as all games averaged below 600,000 viewers. This fell short of last season’s overall average viewership, which stood at 816,000 per game.

One key difference this year was that the UFL’s opening weekend went head-to-head with the NCAA Tournament, which was not the case last season. Specifically, Friday’s matchup between St. Louis and Houston faced stiff competition from the NCAA’s March Madness Sweet 16 games. Those matchups averaged over 7 million viewers on CBS and nearly 3 million viewers on TBS. Additionally, the UFL had to contend with WWE’s SmackDown on USA and the World Figure Skating Championships on NBC, both of which averaged over 1.3 million viewers.

As for individual game performances, Saturday afternoon’s showdown between the San Antonio Brahmas and the Arlington Renegades averaged 584,000 viewers, peaking at 673,000. On Sunday, the ESPN doubleheader saw the Memphis Showboats take on the Michigan Panthers, drawing an average of 569,000 viewers. Later that evening, the second game of the doubleheader featured the Birmingham Stallions facing off against the D.C. Defenders, but it only managed to attract an average of 395,000 viewers.

Looking ahead, the league now shifts its focus to Week 2 of the season. This coming weekend, games will be played on Friday and Saturday, with both airing at 8 p.m. on FOX and ABC, respectively. On Sunday, a doubleheader is scheduled, beginning with a noon kickoff between Houston and Arlington on ESPN, followed by San Antonio and St. Louis at 6 p.m. on FS1.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.

Why the Trend of Television News Layoffs Is Only Just Beginning

1

Television news is getting depressing, and not just because we seem to be more unpopular than ever.

Layoffs and firings are spreading like California wildfires. And even if you have little sympathy for those losing their jobs, the implications are greater than you might think.

After the dot-com bubble burst in 2000, I was part of an executive team that had to make some tough decisions. The process started with buyouts and, as usual, quickly turned into layoffs.

It was a painful time, and we lost plenty of good people, just as is now happening all over the media landscape. The cuts are endless.

ABC has laid off about 300 people in the last six months. It’s been reported that top talent will lose money in upcoming contract negotiations. NBC has lost as many as 100 over two years. Highly paid marquee names have not been exempt. Faced with a substantial salary cut, Today co-host Hoda Kotb decided to leave.

CBS axed 5% of the news division. CBS Evening News anchor Norah O’Donnell, who had been ordered to take a big pay cut, left the job after five years and has become a correspondent. Former evening news anchor Jeff Glor left the network amid cutbacks by Paramount.

MSNBC’s top star, Rachel Maddow, lost $5 million of her $30 million yearly paycheck for showing up one night a week. I’m sorry, but it’s hard to feel sympathy for someone making $25 million instead of $30 million

CNN laid off 6% of its employees but promised there would be new job openings as it invests $70 million into its digital operations. It hasn’t happened yet. They cut hundreds of employees in 2022.

And recently politics has played a role. President Trump, unhappy with the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe — which he views as too liberal — dismissed 1,300 of its journalists and staffers, although a judge has blocked that order and says the group gets their jobs back for now.

Newspapers may be deemed dinosaurs these days, but the degree that they drive television coverage is remarkable. At The Washington Post –with an assist from owner Jeff Bezos — about 100 people have been let go and others quit to protest his ban on dissenting opinions on two broad topics: personal liberty and free markets.

The Los Angeles Times sliced more than 20% of its staff under billionaire owner Patrick Soon-Shiong.

This isn’t NASA-style rocket science. Losing talented journalists with decades of experience and insight hurts newsgathering across the board.

Smaller media companies across the country are reorganizing or failing. Remember The Messenger? Jimmy Finkelstein, former owner of The Hill, used lucrative salaries to lure top performers to his much-hyped website. Less than a year later, he abruptly shut it down, costing 175 journalists their jobs, with no severance payments.

While much of the TV layoffs center on national outlets, local stations haven’t been spared. Tegna cut 20 people by getting rid of its fact-checking group. Some 260 have been dropped at Nexstar stations.

Anyone who can’t see that deep cuts will reduce coverage of local, state, and national politicians needs an eye exam.

One year ago, an influential member of Congress, Appropriations Committee chair Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX), stopped showing up for work. She also stopped voting. None of the hordes of reporters covering Capitol Hill noticed. And due to budget cuts, hometown papers have stopped sending reporters to D.C. to cover politicians from their states.

It was only when reporter Carlos Turcios of the Dallas Express, a small website, got a tip and took a crew to a Texas nursing facility for those with memory problems that the reason for her absence was confirmed. Days later, her son acknowledged that the 77-year-old Granger had “dementia issues.”

It was a huge embarrassment for the national press.

The cuts have caused thousands of journalists to leave their chosen field, forcing them to abandon their calling. In 2024 alone, nearly 15,000 media jobs were lost, according to the firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. It’s clear traditional advertising and subscription models just aren’t working.

As a sign of the times, NBC Universal announced in November that it would spin off its cable networks, including MSNBC and CNBC, as a publicly traded company controlled by Comcast shareholders. This has created considerable unease at MSNBC, which according to Nielsen has seen a 62% drop in total viewers in primetime since the election. CNN lost 45%.

Fox News, which positions itself as an alternative to the mainstream media, is an anomaly when it comes to low viewership and advertising dollars. The juggernaut drew seven in ten cable news viewers in primetime in January and on some nights finishes ahead of the broadcast networks.

I understand why media companies are desperate to slice headcount. Revenues are falling as fast as viewers and readers are fading, leaving for podcasts and TikTok. The top brass was hired to keep the lights on and it’s increasingly becoming a difficult job. But let’s face it, greed is a big factor. The transition to streaming is moving at a snail’s pace making executives worry about their jobs. And it’s easier to cut a salary from someone else’s paycheck than your own.

At a time when press freedom is more important than ever, it’s hard to see how news organizations will get stronger, or more popular, by cutting the very people who know how to dig, report exclusives, and hold top officials accountable. But, sadly, it’s not a trend we will see reversed for a long time to come.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.

What Sports Radio Can Learn From Jon Gruden

0

Jon Gruden is a 61-year-old man child who has an endearing love for the sports of football. He was born just a ninety-minute drive northwest of the Pro Football Hall of Fame and has worked nearly every job imaginable in the game from ball boy to head coach. He’s the single-greatest example of a football lifer who has seen the highest of highs, and the lowest of lows. 

When Gruden signed with Barstool Sports in November of 2024, I was curious how the digital media giant would utilize Gruden. He had begun his own YouTube channel dedicated to deep analyzation of NFL matchups giving fans a behind the scenes peak into the mind of a Super Bowl winning head coach. Over the last five months, Gruden has been a smash hit for Barstool Sports in engagement, while flooding your social feeds with all sorts of behind-the-scenes content that’s appealing to the NFL fan in us all.  

If you haven’t noticed lately, Gruden has found himself being the luckiest kid of football Christmas. Numerous colleges and NFL franchises have been sending Gruden boxes of gear, swag, and team licensed gear for free. The Super Bowl winning head coach has taken unboxing on social media to a whole new level, with the energy and excitement of that 61-year-old man child we all know. This got me thinking, as much as sports radio is a free product to consume, where is the free gear stations are dishing out to their most endearing and devoted listeners? 

We can all agree, we all like free. Jon Gruden is no different than anyone else, free is always me. And I like me. 

Gruden Is Football’s Most Influential Social Media Influencer

Looking at Gruden’s unboxing videos, the reason why these colleges and professional football programs are sending Gruden the free gear should be the simplest thing to understand in this column. Gruden has an audience, an audience that earns disposable income, and the football programs benefit in free marketing on Gruden’s social platforms with the hope of return on no investment in their marketing. I would think the return on the shipping cost is quite large for many of these brands.  

It’s practically an endorsement without paying the endorsement fee, while leveraging a significant influencer to market your product by giving it away for free.  

Isn’t that what station gear is meant to do? The station is the influencer, and the product is the gear where listeners will wear the gear to bars, work, and the weekly softball game. People want to represent brands they believe in, and there is nothing more appealing to a listener plus any better opportunity for sports radio brands to market themselves than gear. 

This Is Not A T-Shirt, It’s A Billboard

It continues to baffle me how hard it is for sports radio stations to figure out that the best form of advertising your brand is through your listeners. Word of mouth is the single greatest form of marketing for any sports radio brand to have, not only in the content you discuss on air but in the look and attitude of gear. While marketing dollars continue to be other places like paid social media, mailers, and billboard on the side of the highway; too often the simplistic concept of printing shirts has become foreign to sports radio brands. 

Some sports radio brands have their own gear, and shops where listeners can purchase it.  

94WIP in Philadelphia is a juggernaut of a sports radio brand who has made the merch game a priority for their listeners. Teaming up with BreakingT.com, the sports radio station has a shop tab on their homepage leading listeners to buy station branded gear and team gear with a twist. BreakingT has the same arrangement with 106.7 The Fan in D.C., while 670 The Score in Chicago has a shop arranged with Versatees.

Boston’s 98.5 The Sports Hub has their own custom shop through RadioSwagShop.com, while WFAN in New York City has their own station custom shop through WFANteamstore.com.

While these sports radio brands are doing it right by having a store available to purchase gear, this also leads to other ideas of what you could do with it to save your devoted listener some of their hard-earned income. Work in a specific call to action with a merch drop at one of your top clients, an online hour-long discount sale, or appearances for free gear in exchange for donations for charity.

It’s one thing to have the link live on your website, but it’s another to do something with it that benefits the radio station in marketing and revenue.

Getting Creative With Your Own Branded Gear

Not every sports radio station can pull off what these titans of the industry are doing, but have most even tried? Has it ever come up in a promotions meeting about leveraging some unsold inventory to get some trade for t-shirt swag? Was there ever a concept with partnering with a local print shop for some social marketing integration? Do sports radio brands even bridge the conversation about inserting some added marketing dollars into their budgets? 

You also need to remember the most creative minds any sports radio station has are the ones behind the mic. Why not utilize that talent to get creative with your branded gear? What memorable moments from each of your programs resonate leading you to say, ‘put that on a t-shirt and sell it?’ 

It seems simple on paper; but it seems it’s easier for most to forget. A sports radio station’s marketing is the single most important item in making your station memorable to the listeners you serve. No promo, segment, guest, featured bit, or sound byte can match the connectivity a listener has with their favorite radio station than something that the listener can call their own. 

Your listener wants to be a part of your brand, support your talent, and show off to their friends that you’re one of the boys. The more you lean into your listeners to market your brand, the more likely you win. 

I bet any of the college football programs of NFL teams would love to see Jon Gruden wearing their swag around the Barstool Sports headquarters, because it markets them to the people who work and consume Barstool content. Same goes for Joe from Madison when he’s at the Milwaukee Brewers game cheering on his favorite team, representing his favorite radio station with thousands of his closest friends. 

The Return On Your Merchandising Investment

The smile I’ve watched on Jon Gruden’s face tells the only story any sports radio brand needs to hear when it comes to creating and marketing swag. The sheer excitement of opening a box with whatever sharp object to be found, the joy of opening bag after bag of team swag, and the sell job for the cost of only shipping and handling is the single greatest spend any brand can make with Gruden putting his name alongside your product without him even knowing what he’s doing.  

Jon Gruden just loves football, and brands who speak his language while also loving football.  

Your listeners love you. Give them something to allow them to show off that love.

While Barstool Sports has changed the game in how traditional sports radio outlets look at crafting content and building the on-demand experience for the listener. Jon Gruden’s unboxing videos should be the single-greatest reminder that marketing through your branded gear is the best form of free promotion. 

Put a t-shirt on your audience and see how large you grow. 

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.

When Does ‘New Music’ Stop Being ‘New’?

0

First, I would like to thank Jason Barrett and Jeff Lynn for welcoming me to hopefully bring you thought-provoking, interesting topics for the world of Hot AC radio. 

Am I the most qualified to speak on these topics?  Well, you can decide on that from article to article, but like most who have spent time programming in this format, I also have opinions and thoughts.  

To launch this new venture, I decided to try to answer the question: When does “new” music stop being new? I’ve thought about that many times while creating and programming brands for SiriusXM.  

It has been a moving target for some time as technology and consumer savvy continually move the goalposts. If you program a Hot AC or any music station that plays currents, you need to get this right!

I will throw this out there now: in today’s world of music consumption, calling anything “new” longer than a week is a mistake! Except at an adult-targeted Mainstream AC that may go earlier than normal on a song like Lady Gaga & Bruno Mars / Die With a Smile because it texturally makes sense for their audience.

Even in that situation, two to three weeks would be more than enough. I have heard programmers say, “Well, it’s new still to our audience,” or “No one else in the market is on it yet…so it’s new!” or “We still label it new because it’s unfamiliar to the audience in my research.”

That may have been the case before DSPs, TikTok, Sirius XM, Soundcloud, and YouTube. The music is out, and your audience is getting exposed to it, and if you keep telling them, “This is New Music on XYZ-FM,” you will come off as not authentic to your audience.

In today’s competitive landscape, can you afford to make that mistake? Using the word “new” to position those recently added songs to your rotations is easy. The word paints a spotlight for sure, but in today’s radio climate, it no longer works for long or possibly at all.

Thinking of creative ways to present these songs is part of your job as a programmer and something your audience expects. A listener’s BS meter goes off loud when they hear something that does not come off as authentic.  

Now, I do believe you can position these songs as “It’s new on (insert your calls here) this week; go ahead and feel free to use that when the new Ed Sheeran / “Azizam” comes this Friday. 

Then, after that, you need to figure out a way to position these songs to draw attention to them since you likely want your audience to believe you are the leader in your market when it comes to exposing fresh music.

Fresh, trending music you need in your ears, music we think you need to know. This is Hitbound, which has been used at SiriusXM Hits 1. Whatever you can say to creatively point out that this is “new” without using that word for more than a week, maybe less!  

As the programmer, you must assume that when a popular artist releases a new album, both super fans and possibly casual fans will likely consume much of it before you decide to play it on your station or, even worse, play the label game of waiting for impact dates to play particular focus tracks.

As a programmer, you should play what you think is right for your audience. That means consuming the music when it comes out, not waiting for a label to tell you what to focus on!  

That often aligns with the record label’s priorities, but not always. In today’s landscape, where there are so many outlets to get and hear “new” music, and that means it does not stay “new” for long.

To get the new additions to your station familiar enough with your audience to gauge research, you need to play these songs longer than a week and in a meaningful rotation.  

The key is to figure out the best way to sell this music without using the word “new.” That, my radio programming friends, is your opportunity to get creative and make sure your audience believes you are their outlet for discovering new music!

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.

Success of Newsmax IPO Shows Cable News is Far From Dead in the Water

1

Newsmax began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on Monday. I don’t know what I expected to happen, but the price rising by more than 700% wasn’t in line with my expectations, I know that.

There’s a lot of talk about the viability of the cable bundle, cable television as a whole, and cable news. The success of the Newsmax IPO shows just how unfounded those claims might be.

Think about it: A television network that didn’t hit cable television until 2014 — basically boarding the Titanic after it had already hit the iceberg — just saw its stock price close 36 cents below Apple on a per-share basis. Apple! Like, the maker of the phone there’s a roughly 46% chance you’re reading this column on, Apple.

If you look at the media-related stock ticker at the top of our website, you’re about as likely to spot a pig flying through the air as you are to see a company with a triple-digit stock price, let alone one where the number begins with a two.

Maybe this isn’t sustainable. Maybe it’s a meme-stock in an effort to “own the libs.” But even if that’s the case, it made Newsmax founder Chris Ruddy an overnight billionaire as the stock soared from its $10 opening price on Monday. And it further legitimized the company as it has seen steady growth in the cable news ratings over the course of the past two years.

That flies in the face of conventional wisdom that cable television — make that linear television as a whole — is dead.

Fox News just finished the first quarter of 2025 as the highest-rated cable news network in history. It’s routinely pulling in audiences that best network television.

Couple that with the fact that Newsmax raised $300 million in a round of private funding before hitting the New York Stock Exchange this week and it’s stock price being the virtual definition of “soaring” in its first days on the market, I don’t know how you could argue that the cable news industry is dying.

Maybe I’m naive. Maybe the Newsmax stock price reaching the stratosphere is actually a house of cards that is about to come tumbling down. But I don’t know if you could have predicted a better opening for the company than what has transpired in the last few days.

Just like I don’t know that you could have predicted Fox News would be setting new records as cable television audiences continue to dwindle.

But both fly in the face of the narrative that cable news is a dying industry.

I wouldn’t go as far as to say the genre is akin to Arnold Schwarzenegger in a mid-70s body-building contest, either. But it’s inaccurate, in my view, to sit back and say that things are dire simply because MSNBC and CNN are in the midst of rough patches after Donald Trump secured victory in the 2024 election.

All I know is, the evidence points to things being significantly more rosy in the cable news world than previously thought. And it makes sense. In the television world right now, two things — and only two things — matter and give a network an edge: live sports and live news. So while Chris Ruddy might have been painted as the town fool in 2014 when he got the idea to launch Newsmax as a cable brand, it’s hard to argue that the move hasn’t paid dividends — stock pun intended! — as the company has seen a ridiculous surge since its stock hit the open market.

Folks on Wall Street aren’t stupid. At least not all of them. If they see value in Newsmax’s stock — to the tune of pushing the price near that of companies like Apple and Tesla — then I think it’s difficult for anyone to dismiss the cable news industry just quite yet.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.

Dealing With The Less Glamorous Side Of Management

0

Coming up in business, I always wanted to be “In Charge.” I thought that was the pinnacle of success and would be seen by others that way as well. Perhaps it’s the control freak within, but I honestly think it is more than ego.

Of course, it has its perks – such as higher salaries, flexibility, and autonomy, which are all appealing. The downside is that being in charge always comes with frustrations and stressors that are not immediately visible to others. From constant decision-making to managing interpersonal dynamics, the role inevitably comes with a hefty price tag.

As a double-A personality or driver-driver, one of the most significant frustrations of being in charge is the overwhelming weight of responsibility that comes with the role. As “the boss,” all major decisions, from hiring to budgeting, rest on your shoulders.

Every mistake or success comes back on you. Other team members can pass issues upward or to others, but the team lead or manager is the ultimate decision-maker and is often the final safety net when things go wrong. The pressure of ensuring your team performs well, your company remains profitable, and addressing problems can be mentally and emotionally exhausting.

In our industry, a GM or Market Manager is tasked with managing not only the operational, technical, and financial aspects of the business but also the people who make up your team. Navigating personalities, expectations, and office dynamics can often be a challenging balancing act.

Conflicts, varied work styles, and communication breakdowns can lead to tension, and it’s often up to the boss to mediate. I am often reminded of the famous line from the classic film “Cool Hand Luke” with Paul Newman! “What we’ve got here is failure to communicate!” Click here to see the scene. I will say that I have definitely repeated that line a few times in my career. (The line, not the action.)   

Employee personal issues or struggles with performance add an even greater layer of complexity to the role. On top of this, managers face the challenge of aligning the individual goals of team members with the larger objectives of the company, which can lead to feelings of frustration on both sides.

Within the last 10 years, we have talked more about “Work-Life Balance. At the top spot, that is often an illusion that can evaporate relatively quickly. I learned this one many years ago. Employees can go home and turn it off, but being in charge requires being constantly “on,” regardless of the time of day – often even on vacation.

The person on top is often expected to be available at all hours, answering emails, attending late meetings, and resolving emergencies or client issues. At one company, it was common to see emails from the CEO at 2 am. There are no easy boundaries between work and personal time when you’re responsible for the livelihood of a team.

It becomes important to guard oneself from burnout, decreased quality of life, and the feeling that personal time is being sacrificed for the sake of the business. Many divorces have been initiated due to this same issue.

There’s also something else I have never experienced much of, but isolation is common among company Presidents and CEOs. It is one of the hidden emotional challenges of being the boss that can come with the role. The higher up you go in an organization, the fewer confidants you may have.

This is a result of an invisible barrier between you and others, which makes it difficult to have candid, honest conversations. Without working on ways to combat it, that sense of isolation can lead to a feeling of disconnect, particularly if you’re making many decisions that have a considerable impact on others.

Despite holding the top position, managers are also not immune to criticism. In fact, managers often face more scrutiny than anyone—from upper management, customers, and employees themselves. Leaders are under a constant microscope. We all know that negative feedback, even when constructive, can feel overwhelming, especially when there’s little opportunity to share the frustration or find support.

The fear of making a wrong decision and the weight of criticism can be mentally taxing, leading to self-doubt and frustration.

While being the boss does have many benefits, it’s crucial that everyone in an organization understands the less glamorous side of leadership. The responsibility, the emotional toll of managing people, the blurred lines between work and personal life, the isolation, and the constant criticism from all corners of the business are all parts of the equation.

I have always loved being a manager. The roles can be fulfilling and rewarding, but it’s not without its frustrations. Understanding the challenges can help aspiring leaders prepare for the realities of leadership and approach the opportunities with a balanced perspective.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.

Radio Must Meet the Audience Where They Are and Embrace New Technology

0

I recently found myself in two uncomfortable situations. First, I was invited to be a guest on a podcast where the host wanted to discuss my time working in radio. Ironically, on the same day, I was scheduled to speak to a group of radio students at an HBCU about the role of a radio program director. My immediate thought was: OK, you cannot be negative in these conversations. You cannot talk badly about radio.

Now, let me take some of the edge off that thought—I don’t hate radio. But radio isn’t what it used to be.

Both conversations started the same way, which didn’t help my discomfort. The host and moderator opened with a rundown of my career—stations, markets, and corporate stints. To be clear, I have no issues with any place I’ve worked in radio. Each experience had its highs and challenges. Years ago, in Pat Riley’s book The Winner Within, I read, “Never demean your time in the trenches.” So, I celebrate every stop in my career.

After reflecting on both conversations, I realized what I dislike most about radio today: talking about the “good old days.” I love catching up with old friends from radio and records, reminiscing about promotions, dinners, concerts, and conventions. But when the conversation shifts to “it’s not what it used to be” (insert sad emoji here), it trails off, leaving you regretting that you went there.

I know, I know—some may think I’m jaded and hating on radio. And while I have my moments (insert shaking head emoji), my passion for the audience and the community that urban radio serves always kicks in. The questions from the host, moderator, and students made it easier to present a brighter outlook on radio. It may not always be obvious, but I still love radio. Even with the competition from countless other content platforms, I remain excited about what radio can be.

Radio still commands a tremendous weekly audience. However, as revenue became not just a priority but a corporate dictate, the demand for sponsorship opportunities from programmers clashed with branding goals. The role of the brand manager lost its shine. Fortunately for current and aspiring programmers, we’re in a content-driven world—and that should be the focus.

Content is key—on-air, across social media, on your website, and in your station’s app. Repurposing and creating exclusive content for all platforms is what kept radio fun for me and rekindled my passion for programming. When artists came to the station for interviews, they also participated in additional content for our other outlets. We curated events that generated even more content opportunities. This experience fuels my work on my podcast network today, finding and sharing engaging moments in the form of audio, video, and graphics across various social platforms, which provides a great deal of satisfaction and visibility.

For students aspiring to be program directors, my advice is simple: First, focus on your audience. Then, meet them where they are. Embrace all social platforms—not just YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and X, but also emerging platforms like BlueSky and Fanbase. This advice applies to current program directors as well.

And I would be remiss if I didn’t address AI. Keeping up with content demands can be overwhelming, but AI can be a powerful tool. Be excited about it. Learn it. Understand it. Use it. Challenge it. Just don’t fear or ignore it.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.