AI is coming to the microphone, and news/talk radio should brace for it. Chatbots like ChatGPT sound warmer and more natural every month. Consequently, it’s only a matter of time until someone uses the technology as an on-air co-host.
Make no mistake about it: this is on the horizon. You can pretend it won’t happen, but it will. Right now, the only thing stopping companies is quality. The technology isn’t good enough. Yet. But that’s changing fast.
I could fight it. You could, too. We could all vow never to interact with AI voices on the air. However, I don’t think we’d win that fight. I’m not sure an audience boycott could stop it, either.
Risk Rewards The Bold
Innovators and disruptors usually see the largest return for their risk. Yes, there are concerns about moving too early. Some pioneers get burned by racing too far ahead of the curve. Still, I’ve always believed it’s better to experiment. Take the risk, take the chance, or use whatever word you’d like. Then either succeed or learn from the mistake. Both outcomes beat standing still.
Radio has already seen hints of what’s possible. For instance, Spotify’s AI DJ showed that listeners will accept a synthetic voice guiding their listening. Likewise, Futuri’s RadioGPT offered an early look at automated on-air content. Those experiments were small, but they proved audiences are curious.
The pace of improvement also matters. Voice models that sounded robotic two years ago now handle pauses, laughter, and interruptions. Furthermore, they can pull in headlines, weather, and traffic in seconds. For a news/talk format built on timely information, that’s a natural fit. It won’t replace a great host. Instead, it could become a sparring partner, a fact-checker, or a punchline machine.
Credit And Criticism Arrive Together
The first prominent figure to use AI in an on-air role will reap the benefits. Certainly, a segment of the audience will rebuke it. Meanwhile, another segment will find the technology interesting and compelling. That split isn’t a problem. In fact, it’s an opportunity.
Consider how ratings work. Curiosity drives sampling, and sampling drives cume. Even the loudest critics will tune in to hear it for themselves. Then they’ll tell their friends, post about it, and argue about it online. As a result, the buzz alone could be worth more than any promo budget.
Of course, execution will matter. Programmers should tell listeners exactly what they’re hearing. Transparency builds trust, and trust softens backlash. Additionally, the AI voice needs a defined role and a real personality. A gimmick fades quickly, but a well-built character can stick.
Perception Is Reality
The first show or station to do it will absorb all of the criticism and all of the credit for setting the trend. Everyone else will look like copycats. They’ll have waited for somebody else to take the risk.
Afterward, they’ll rush to catch up, and audiences will notice.
So the choice is simple. Fight the technology and lose, or embrace AI and use it prominently. If perception is reality, why not be perceived as cutting-edge? Somebody’s going to grab that title.
I’d rather see a bold programmer or host claim it than watch the industry wait for permission.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.
