Mike Francesa plans to leave WFAN after his contract expires at the end of 2017, he said in a podcast he recorded Tuesday with Fox’s Katie Nolan. It is to be posted in full Thursday, but an excerpt was released Tuesday night.
“At the end of ’17, there will be no more FAN, that I promise,” Francesa told Nolan.
While he has hinted strongly in the past that he would not re-sign beyond that, he had not previously said so as emphatically as he did in the interview with Nolan of the Fox show “Garbage Time.”
“I’m not saying I’m leaving the business,” he said. “I’m leaving Monday to Friday, 5 1⁄2 hours, FAN,” Francesa, 61, said. “I am bringing the curtain down on that part of the show. I am not saying I’m not going to work again. I’m not saying I’m not going to do anything ever again. What I’m saying is that part of my life is ending at the end of ’17.”
Credit to Newsday who originally published this article
94.1 WIP’s Josh Innes who hosts afternoons with former NFL player Hollis Thomas is in hot water after using a racial epithet to describe Eagles center Jason Kelce. Innes has since apologized for using poor judgment.
“I’m the dumbest human being on the planet,” Innes said, noting his intention was not to offend anybody. “I apologize for that, I truly do. I’m an idiot.”
Innes and Thomas were on the air prior to Doug Pederson’s introductory press conference as the new Head Coach of the Eagles. Thomas mentioned that Kelce was already at the press conference which didn’t sit well with Innes. Josh tried to suggest that Kelce was the resident butt kisser of the franchise but in doing so he made a reference which put him quickly in the line of fire.
The transcript of what he said is listed below. The audio can be heard on Crossing Broad.
“Here’s the thing though, right, it’s like this. Let me find a good comparison here. I was watching Malcolm X yesterday, I was in the airport in Memphis watching Malcolm X, and there was a scene where Denzel’s doing the whole thing about the slave and the house negro? Right? And like, the house negro is the guy who’s gonna tell you like, oh he gets to live in the big house with the boss. And every time he refers to something that happens in the house it’s ‘our house’ and ‘we’ and everything like that. And then there’s the actual slave that isn’t the house negro that’s just trying to run away. Essentially what you’re getting here is Jason Kelce is the house negro is what I’m trying to convey to you.”
Following his apology Innes added “I see people are making fun of me across the country, and you should be, because I’m stupid,”. WIP officials have yet to comment on the situation.
Landing a job can be a very emotional and tiring process. In most cases, candidates wrestle with numerous questions about whether to stay or go, while trying to craft the perfect narrative to satisfy their fears about the future. They sometimes take weeks, and even months trying to determine if a new opportunity makes sense to accept.
Equally as challenging is the employer’s position. When a vacancy exists inside an operation, there’s a lot of disruptions that occur. It becomes difficult for other staff members because they’re usually asked to absorb a heavier burden, and depending on the position, it can lead to an increase in noise from the outside too.
In both instances, each side is tasked with one important responsibility – making the right choice!
But it doesn’t always work out that way.
When you hire someone, you have a 50/50 chance of being right. The choice you make can leave you looking like a genius or the biggest fool in the office. You can research an individual, and talk to everyone under the sun about them, and while those conversations will offer insight to help you out, it still comes down to trusting your gut!
If you’re the candidate, it’s a similar gamble. You can look at the city you’re considering moving to and review the company’s previous hires, talk to people employed by the same organization in other cities, and even analyze the group’s stock performance if you wish, but when the moment comes to say yes, you’re going to do it based on the connection you’ve formed with the individual(s) offering you an opportunity.
Although every scenario is different, I’m a big believer in striking while the iron is hot. The longer a hiring process plays out, the worse it usually turns out. In many cases it also leads to the ‘hot candidate’ or ‘perfect job’ becoming less attractive.
When a company reaches out to discuss a possible fit, that initial inquiry tells you that they believe you are worth pursuing. How you click with the hiring team once you start talking indicates whether or not things will advance to the next level.
Assuming the discussions go well, it’s often followed up with a face to face meeting, and a ‘sales pitch’ on how great the situation could be if you were to get on board.
After two sides lay out their negotiating points and find a middle ground, most companies will ask for a resolution. They may give you an extra day or two to think things over but then they expect an answer. If you’re not sold by this point, you may ask a few follow up questions to gain some extra feedback, but if what gets relayed doesn’t put your mind at ease to say yes and sign on the dotted line, then it’s not likely going to work out.
Now let’s look at it from the other side.
If you’re the employer and you’ve done your homework scouting a potential hire, you know pretty quickly if they have the skillset you’re looking for. You’ll review their work history, dig into their background to find out if there are any skeletons in their closet, and you may talk to some people who have worked with the candidate to make sure they’re someone worth sticking your neck out for.
Once that information is known, the real questions to be answered are whether or not you can connect as manager to employee, what the expectations of the position are, what you’re willing to do to help them experience success, and what the compensation package looks like. If those questions are met with resistance, and the two sides can’t find a happy medium, then it’s not going to be good for either party.
As the employer roleplays in their mind whether or not someone is the right fit to join the staff, they end up crossing people off the list the longer the process continues.
When you’re impressed and excited, you want to move fast so nobody else can get their hands on the prize that you’ve uncovered. Rather than move forward with uncertainty, you’re ready to cancel all other considerations because your mind, heart and gut are all telling you the same thing – the situation feels right. If that feeling isn’t there, it’s probably for a good reason.
It’s similar to being a single male who meets a gorgeous woman. If you don’t act quickly to express your interest and ask her on a date, someone else will be right behind you ready to act. Once they do, you may never get another chance.
Let’s be clear about something – if a hiring manager doesn’t believe you’re a special individual or the right fit, that doesn’t mean you lack skill or wouldn’t be great elsewhere. So many partnerships in this business are the result of a strong fit and connection than they are about who possesses more talent.
Some applicants take it personally when the call doesn’t come their way, and while it can be frustrating when you have your hopes up and want to be part of a specific operation, the reality is that it’s not going to work out if the person making the call doesn’t have an unwavering belief, confidence and genuine excitement about having you on their staff.
I’m often asked by people and companies for input on candidates and possible openings and there are a few key things I believe are important as it pertains to this process.
First here are a few tips for the candidates.
Don’t pursue a position if you’re not willing to accept it: A lot of people like to feel important and receive an offer to make them feel good, but when push comes to shove, they’re not ready to accept. There’s nothing wrong with exploring your options, but before you put a hiring boss on the hook with their company for making you an offer, make sure you are committed to pursuing it. If you’re not, be up front with them that the likelihood of you accepting the offer is a long shot. You’ll gain more respect that way and you may even be surprised by how far the group will go to try and secure your services.
Pursue with passion but respect the hiring manager’s rules for communication: If they want more audio, send it. If they tell you don’t call, don’t. If they ask for a few days to respond, be patient. Even if you hear of others being given consideration for the job, remember that you’re not the only person they’re going to talk to. If your talent is great and you fit the bill for what they’re after, they’ll follow up. There’s a fine line between persistence and annoyance. Don’t cross it and cost yourself an opportunity.
Have an understanding of what matters to you most in the job you’re seeking: If you make your wish list and it shows “money, length of commitment, and great city with warm weather” as your three most important elements, and the company pursuing you checks those boxes, you can understand their frustration if you don’t accept. It’s one thing to not explore a job because the money wasn’t right, the commitment was thin, or the neighborhoods don’t align with your preferred choice of living, but whether it’s three, four or five key items, know what they are, and press the hiring group on them so you have the clarity you need in making your decision.
Now let’s take a look at things from the position of the employer.
Know what you’re looking for before you start the process: If you’re drawn to someone who makes you laugh and is less confrontational, say that. If you prefer the opposite, say that too. Hiring managers want great talent and a guarantee of future success but it starts with the specifics. Think about the qualities you’re drawn to in others, what you want your brand and people to represent, how you want them to approach their jobs, and then focus on the candidates who fit the bill. There’s a lot of talent out there but you can’t identify the right one until you know what you’re searching for.
Investigate, communicate, and set a date: When you have an opening, your focus turns to finding a solution. If you had a gash on your arm you wouldn’t wait to get it stitched up and it’s no different with filling a hole on your staff. Turn over every stone you can so you have a thorough understanding of the person you’re considering hiring. Talk to friends, family, colleagues, competitors, and get a true sense of who it is you’re considering forming a partnership with. Then, set a deadline so others in your company know what can be expected, and you can hold yourself accountable to deliver a solution. As you engage with candidates, stick to your word if you promise a follow up call or email. If you’re not interested, communicate that too. Transparency is important in staying on track and maintaining respect with those who apply. Remember, people talk to other people. You don’t want to damage your reputation by not handling things that were under your control.
Don’t offer the job unless you’re 100% sure it’s the person you want: I’ve advised a few people on certain jobs and on three different occasions, a company has offered a position, only to rescind it afterwards. That’s not only bad business but it’s disrespectful. It’s also the type of decision making that leads me to caution others on pursuing work with those organizations. If a manager isn’t sold on someone or is having buyer’s remorse, that’s understandable. But remember that your credibility and reputation are on the line once you make the call. If you’re unsure, don’t make an offer. You can still discuss salary requirements, the length of a contract, and job specifics without an agreement. If you want the responsibility of hiring people, then take it seriously. Don’t mess with someone’s emotions or risk causing damage to their family or current job by not being sure if you want them on your staff. They’ll respect and appreciate you more for walking away than if you make a promise you can’t deliver on.
When you think about the challenges of hiring or going to work for a new company, picture being in the middle of the process between an NFL or MLB franchise, and a key Free Agent or Head Coach.
Once the world knows that a player or coach is available, word trickles out and teams begin doing their due diligence. They’ll investigate what an individual brings to the table, how they believe they’d fit the team, and then after they gain some insight into what that person is seeking in terms of salary and length of commitment, they’ll make a decision on whether or not to move forward.
Once they know they’re interested, that’s when the madness begins.
Soon the visits are scheduled, conversations are had on a deeper level, and in the matter of a few hours, people are making life changing decisions. Rarely do you see these situations linger for weeks or months.
Each free agent enters a facility knowing that they could be signing a long term commitment that day. There’s no extended window offered to review the school system, the daily commute time, or the leisure spots in the area for the family. Those are things that people adjust to.
Instead the focus is on these key factors:
Are they meeting my salary requirements
Are they offering enough security (length) to ease my mind
Do I believe they’re committed to winning and possess a strong vision
Do I click with the boss and feel we can have a good working relationship
If those four boxes get checked, then it’s up to the individual to process the information in their head, talk to their family, trust their gut, and make the call. They could be making a big mistake or it could be the beginning of their own personal nirvana. Regardless of how it turns out in the future though, a decision has to be made in the present.
I see too many situations pop up where companies spend months looking for the perfect candidate, only to stunt their growth, disrupt their inner workings, and slow down business, all because they were gunshy on making a hire. You do more damage dragging out a process than you do by making a decision and having to adjust down the road.
There’s a feeling of nervousness inside most hiring managers because nobody wants to make the wrong move. That’s a natural feeling and it shows that you care about your company and want to do the right thing. But you can feel good enough to hit Powerball on the day you hire someone, and there still remains a strong possibility that you may have swung and missed.
The same applies to any person exploring a new opportunity. You can feed your ego and boost your confidence by pursuing opportunities and you may even gain a contract offer, but remember that the feeling of being the shiny new toy eventually goes away.
Making a decision to leave one place for another just because you don’t feel appreciated is fine, but make sure first that you’ve addressed the situation with your current company, and understand how they view you, where you stand, and what your ceiling is. Too often people leave situations in search of greener grass, only to find that it doesn’t exist.
As cliche as it sounds, we work in the communication business yet struggle to communicate. We’d rather reject a boss and blame them for our lack of development instead of seeking them out and challenging them to make us better. We’d rather chase the bigger immediate paycheck than look at how staying put will pay greater long term dividends.
And companies are often guilty of the same thing. They’d rather do less investigating, and hire the person with the longer resume and safer track record, than bet on someone less familiar with more talent and a higher upside. It’s easier to do what others have done, and protect your spot, than stand in the line of fire by attempting to do something great and different.
Regardless of the side you’re on, the bottom line in all of this is to do your homework, know what you’re looking for, find a middle ground, and when the conversations intensify, be ready to make a commitment. The longer you wait, the more you will talk yourself out of things, and the less likely you will be to work together. That could be a devastating blow, or a blessing in disguise. Your chances of being right are 50/50!
2015 was a tumultuous year for Red Zebra Broadcasting’s ESPN 980 in Washington DC. Unfortunately, 2016 is starting off in similar fashion.
Program Director Dan Zampillo is leaving his position with the radio station to pursue other interests. He was unavailable for comment but according to sources he’ll be staying on for a little while during the station’s transition.
Zampillo joined ESPN 980 in late April after former Program Director Chuck Sapienza resigned following a chaotic situation with station ownership. Sapienza made a decision to hire a new local morning show hosted by Jason Reid and Chris Paul titled “The Man Cave”. Before the show could hit the airwaves though, Redskins ownership intervened and pulled the plug on it. Sources state that a few members of the Redskins hierarchy were especially not pleased with Reid who had been a critic of the team during his tenure at the Washington Post.
After two weeks of criticism and the resignation of Sapienza, an understanding was reached and the show was permitted to debut on March 30th. However, it would be short lived as Reid and Paul were handed their walking papers on October 28th, just seven months after taking over the morning slot. The station cited poor ratings as the reason for its decision.
Then to add insult to injury, the radio station parted ways with General Manager Rick Carmean in December. Carmean had spent 8 years with the company, including the past 5 overseeing all of its radio business. Ownership announced they were going in a different direction and utilizing more involvement from team executives. Redskins Executive Vice President Terry Bateman, Redskins Play by Play voice Larry Michael, and Sales Manager Steve Johnson were brought in to help run the company business.
For Zampillo, his run in DC ends sooner than expected. Prior to joining ESPN 980, he spent time programming SiriusXM’s NBA and Bleacher Report channels. He’s also served as PD of 97.1 The Ticket in Detroit, and as APD for WGN in Chicago. No word yet on what his future plans are but interested parties can reach him by email at dzampillo@gmail.com.
FOX Sports announces that they will be making a change to their commentary team, and Greg Norman will not return to the network’s USGA Championships coverage in 2016. The announcement was made today by John Entz, President of Production & Executive Producer, FOX Sports.
Both parties have agreed to an amicable separation and will continue to work together to broadcast the Franklin Templeton Shootout, which remains an important part of FOX Sports’ golf platform.
“After careful consideration, we have decided to make this change to our USGA Championships coverage,” said John Entz. “We want to thank Greg for his contributions last year, and wish him success in all his current and future endeavors.”
“I put a lot into my role this past year and really enjoyed the time I spent with the commentary team,” said Norman. “I have a long history with FOX and wish them well on their journey showcasing USGA Championships. I also want to thank David Hill (former Head of FOX Sports) and the USGA for believing in me and instilling their vote of confidence in me from the outset.”
ESPN, whose parent company Walt Disney is under pressure from Wall Street for falling subscribers and its sports programming costs, won’t enter the hotly contested bidding for the National Football League’s Thursday night games, according to people with knowledge of the bidding process.
The NFL, which is expected to announce winning bidders as early as this week for an eight-week package of games, received proposals from CBS and Twenty First Century Fox’s Fox network in bidding that is expected to exceed the $300 million per season that CBS paid to carry the evening’s games the past two seasons.
The NFL asked bidders in December to submit offers for the entire package and an alternative arrangement in which two bidders would share the eight game slate, CBS Sports Chairman Sean McManus said during a presentation to television critics on Jan. 12. The league-owned NFL Network would carry all 16 Thursday night games, some of them exclusively.
One figure being floated was $400 million for entire eight-game package, whether it is awarded to a single network or shared. The decision is expected by the Feb. 7 Super Bowl.
An ESPN spokesman had no comment but others familiar with ESPN thinking said Disney’s sports channel is comfortable with its flagship Monday Night Football program, which just finished its 45th season, and that the parent company was happy with the current Thursday night prime-time lineup of its sister ABC broadcast network.
To read more visit The Street where this article was originally published
Suzy Kolber announced today on ESPN’s NFL Insiders program that ESPN NFL Reporter and Analyst Chris Mortensen is temporarily stepping away from his assignments in order to battle Stage IV throat cancer.
Mortensen released a statement on Friday which read:
“More than a week ago, I was diagnosed with a Stage IV throat cancer. My focus shifted significantly to gathering information about the specifics of this cancer. The initial diagnosis was confirmed Friday and there is another test remaining that will determine the best possible treatment plan that will commence in the very immediate future. Consequently, with the support and encouragement from ESPN president John Skipper and many others at ESPN, I am temporarily stepping away from my normal NFL coverage duties to better engage this opportunity to fight the good fight that is projected to affect almost 1.7 million Americans with new cases in 2016.”
He continued “I have many inspirational examples of men, women and children who have faced this very fight. We all know somebody, right? I also have the love and prayers of my wife Micki, my family, my friends, colleagues and, most of all, my faith that serve as sources of tremendous strength. I have a peace about this and look forward to the battle.”
Mortensen has been part of ESPN’s football coverage since arriving at the network in 1991. He makes regular appearances on ESPN’s Sunday NFL Countdown, Monday Night Countdown, SportsCenter, NFL Live, NFL Insiders and numerous other ESPN programs, including ESPN Radio.
For more, visit Sports Illustrated where this information was first reported
Three senior writers have joined the staff of “The Undefeated,” ESPN’s upcoming site that will provide in-depth reporting, commentary and insight on race and culture through the lens of sports. The new additions include Buzzfeed’s Kelley Carter, Michael Fletcher and Soraya Nadia McDonald of TheWashington Post, and ESPN.com columnist Jason Reid.
Carter, an award-winning entertainment and pop-culture journalist, will occupy a similar role for ESPN. Fletcher, a Washington Post national economics correspondent, will concentrate on criminal justice, social issues and politics. Over the next year, he will focus on an essay series assessing the historic presidency of Barack Obama. McDonald, arts, entertainment and culture writer for the Washington Post Style section, will cover culture. Reid, a former Washington Postsports columnist, will move from ESPN.com to become The Undefeated’s primary NFL writer, covering topical issues relating to race and culture throughout the league.
“These are all journalists I greatly admire and our readers will love,” said Kevin Merida, ESPN Senior Vice President and Editor-in-Chief of The Undefeated. “They join a talented team already at The Undefeated, which is gaining momentum. I am proud to be associated with them.”
Credit to ESPN Media Zone who originally published this information
“Next up on SportsCenter, you won’t believe this penta-kill from last night’s League match.”
This fictional phrase is more likely to happen than ever, as ESPN joins the world of competitive gaming coverage by devoting writers, editors and a section of its website to esports.
ESPN’s esports section launched Thursday morning. The vertical brings veteran esports writers and editors to the sports media giant, including Rod “Slasher” Breslau, who has covered the field for more than a decade, Darin Kwilinski and Tyler Erzberger.
“Today’s launch … is our latest push to reach and connect with this growing and passionate audience,” said Chad Millman, editor-in-chief of ESPN.com and ESPN The Magazine, in a press release. “Fans will find the same level of quality content and journalism that users of ESPN.com have come to expect, including in-depth looks at the competitive gaming world and on-site reporting from the major tournaments.”
ESPN’s esports page launched with a mix of content, aimed at both the casual viewer (a guide to League of Legends) and the serious fan (a League off-season report card). It’s written to be comfortable for fans, but not insidery, based on the handful of pieces available Thursday.
To read more visit Mashable where this article was originally published
Michelle Beadle has signed a new, multi-year deal with ESPN. She’ll continue to co-host SportsNation with Max Kellerman and Marcellus Wiley. But beginning Feb. 8, the show will move from ESPN2 to flagship ESPN, where it will air in the 4 p.m. slot, essentially kicking off ESPN’s afternoon talk slate of Highly Questionable at 4:30 p.m., Around the Horn at 5 p.m. and Pardon the Interruption at 5:30 p.m.
Additionally, Beadle will join Ramona Shelburne – ESPN senior writer and SportsNation and espnW contributor –for a new national radio show. Beadle & Shelburne will premiere Feb. 14, airing from noon to 2 p.m. ET from ESPN LA 710’s Los Angeles studios.
“I feel genuinely fortunate to work with so many friends and talented people at ESPN, who make every day such fun,” Beadle said in a statement. “I think that joy is evident to our viewers, and why I am particularly excited to be here for the next several years.”