Home Blog Page 2096

Rich Zeoli: Definition of ‘Media Bias’ Has Changed

0

None of the over-the-air nightly network news programs covered the House Select Committee press conference that claimed the FBI retaliated against whistleblowers for claiming there were strong abuses of power. 1210 WPHT host Rich Zeoli argued that it shows a media bias, but the definition of that phrase has changed.

During The Rich Zeoli Show Friday, the Philadelphia host took issue with the lack of coverage around the news, but said it is just another case of what he’s come to expect from large media outlets.

“It’s a damn shame that this happens, but this is what they do,” Zeoli said. “They do this all the time, obviously, because what you don’t hear is part of the story. In the old days, media bias was about how they would report on a story, but the new way is they just don’t report on the story at all. They just don’t talk about it. And if they don’t talk about it? Well…

“One would think that the big three networks would at least briefly cover the hearing and read the FBI’s denials and the denigration of the whistleblowers,” continued Zeoli. “That would at least be expected by ABC, CBS, and NBC, but instead, they decided to ignore it completely in hopes that the story would just go away.”

Zeoli then took issue with an encapsulation from MSNBC’s Nicole Wallace saying those whistleblowers were guilty of “insubordination” during an interview with former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman.

Jesse Watters: Pete Buttigieg Gets Favorable Coverage Because He ‘Checks Many Boxes’

0

During Friday’s latest episode of The Five, the panelists discussed the media’s depiction of Pete Buttigieg, the U.S. Transportation Secretary. Buttigieg, who formerly served as the mayor of South Indiana, has faced backlash for managing critical issues such as supply chain disruptions and train accidents.

“It looks like the media is praising Pete [Buttigieg] because the alternative is much worse,” said Jeanine Pirro. “The White House has been trying to elevate Kamala Harris, and we know they are trying to repair her image.”

According to Jesse Watters, the media intentionally evades challenging inquiries about Buttigieg because they anticipate his future presidential candidacy.

“Look at how many boxes this guy checks for a Democratic nominee,” said Watters. “He’s smart, a veteran, he lifts weights, he’s in a gay relationship, he plays the piano, yet he also splits wood. He loves God, but he loves Blacks, gays, women, and the poor. You can’t check this many boxes. It’s like a consultant came up with something and overdid it.”

In a recent article titled “Pete Buttigieg Loves God, Beer, and His Electric Mustang,” published in Wired, Pirro highlighted the absence of depth and objectivity in the author’s approach.

“Many the reporter himself was this enamored,” said Dana Perino. “You only agree to do a glowing profile piece if you’ve done something significant. You don’t do it on the back of East Palestine. The media keeps trying to make Pete Buttigieg a thing, and the Democrat voters themselves don’t want him as their thing. The media keep trying to shove it down their throats.”

Todd Herman: Kaitlan Collins is on Same Path As Jake Tapper

0

Certain conservative commentators argue that Kaitlan Collins‘ shift in perspective, transitioning from her stance at the Daily Caller to her positions at CNN, is driven more by financial incentives rather than her genuine political beliefs.

During her appearance on Tucker Carlson Tonight in 2017, Kaitlan Collins defended former President Donald Trump’s critique of the press, criticized CNN, and expressed disapproval towards her colleagues for their response to Trump’s criticisms.

Seattle radio host Todd Herman addressed Kaitlan Collins’ shift from being a journalist to adopting an activist role during his guest appearance on Friday while filling in for Dan Loesch.

“The aspect of this that’s very familiar for someone who has worked in the beltway is this has happened to Jake Tapper,” said Herman. “There was a time when Jake [Tapper] was about as straightforward a reporter as you can get. Incidentally, he was also super approachable, a nice guy.”

Herman recounted an incident when he encountered Tapper as he was about to conduct a report at the Republican National Committee building. He admired Tapper’s impartial journalism and lauded his ability to separate his political perspectives from his reporting.

“What has been rewarded at CNN is speaking in these panicked tones about President Trump, speaking in these panicked tones about him being a walking, breathing, death to democracy,” said Herman. “This is what happens in these media circles.”

Herman expressed skepticism about young reporters’ motivations and capacity to evaluate their careers in terms of objectivity and honesty critically.

“If you’re a young person considering a job in big media or politics, I beg you to hear me on this,” he said. “Write down the things you will never do, make a list, and then have them put on plaques. For instance, I will never accept a bribe, I will never cheat on my wife, I will never lie to Congress, I will never lie to the American people, and if it’s my job to lie to the American people, I will never spin the truth for my boss.”

Fox News Reportedly Dissolves Investigative Unit

0

According to Rolling Stone, Fox News has reportedly dissolved its investigative unit and laid off reporters just one month after firing Tucker Carlson, its prominent host known for peddling election fraud claims, and settling a defamation lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems for $787.5 million.

A Fox employee stated that the network’s rank-and-file journalists were being let go while upper management remained unaffected, despite their responsibility for the Dominion debacle. The employee described the journalists as “sacrificial lambs”.

The original lawsuit filed by Dominion sought $1.6 billion in damages and accused Fox News of intentionally broadcasting false information regarding the 2020 election being rigged in favor of President Joe Biden. The network is currently facing another expensive lawsuit from another voting systems company.

This lawsuit also revealed that Rupert Murdoch, the chairman of Fox News’s parent company, urged the network’s CEO, Suzanne Scott, to assist in swaying the U.S. Senate race in Georgia for Republican candidates in 2020.

Scott, who has been with Fox News for 22 years and became the network’s first female CEO in 2018, has faced accusations of fostering a toxic workplace for women. However, she is not the only figure named in the lawsuit that has drawn criticism from staff.

One staffer expressed outrage that Scott and Maria Bartiromo, a Fox News opinion host who shared her interview questions with former President Donald Trump, retained their jobs while journalists were being let go.

Multiple sources confirmed the layoffs, with one former employee speculating that the network might be cutting staff to save money due to the ongoing lawsuit. However, another source claimed that some supposedly fired individuals were merely reassigned away from the investigative unit.

While there is no direct connection between the Dominion settlement and the layoffs, Fox News faces further legal challenges as the Smartmatic defamation lawsuit, currently in the discovery phase, seeks $2.7 billion in damages.

AM Radio Programmers Sound Off on Legislation & Evolution

0

Some of my best memories growing up were listening to the radio in the car with my family.  I’m a big fan of music, so that was always fun to listen to, but it was especially meaningful to me to be able to listen to sporting events on the radio.

A big reason why I work in sports radio today is the inspiration I received as a kid listening to Marty Glickman calling New York Jets games, Marv Albert on play-by-play for New York Knicks games, Phil Rizzuto at the microphone for New York Yankees games, and believe it or not currently Yankees radio voice John Sterling doing radio play-by-play for New York Islanders hockey.

If you think his home run calls have been legendary, you should have heard him call Islanders games!

“Trottier sets up Bossy…GOAL! ISLANDERS GOAL! ISLANDERS GOAL! ISLANDERS GOAL!”  

The common denominator of all of those memories for me is that it was all on AM radio.

Many sports radio stations are now on the FM dial, but many still remain on AM.  Unfortunately, listeners tuning in to hear sports talk and live sporting events on their favorite sports radio stations may soon find themselves in a bit of a pickle… especially if they are in the market for a new car.

That’s because some new cars are being built without AM radio receivers.

“It’s a disservice to the still-viable AM audience and the rural and urban communities they serve,” said Zach McHugh, Brand Manager for The Fan in Richmond.  “AM radio is vital to a fair and equal conversation locally and nationally. Many iconic AM stations are their community’s revenue and ratings leaders. These voices should not be silenced.”

About 40% of the world’s mainstream automobile manufacturers, including BMW, Volkswagen, Mazda, and Tesla are removing the AM signal from new electric vehicles as a result of electric engines interfering with the AM stations.  Ford is taking it a step further removing the AM signals from all electric and gas vehicles.

The radio industry continues to push the envelope in terms of technological advances when it comes to serving their listeners.  For the AM stations that will no longer be heard on some car radios, executives and programmers have been preparing for this day and they’ve been proactive when it comes to finding other ways to reach their audiences.

“Frankly, we weren’t waiting around to see what would happen with the AM band,” said Jeff Austin, Manager of The Fan in Portland. “Sports radio is the format of early adopters, so we’ve met listeners’ needs with a multi-platform approach. Audio and video streams are increasingly popular.”

For stations like The Fan in Portland, the Audacy App has now become a critical and essential tool for all of their stations to reach listeners, not just for the sports fans who want to listen to sports talk or live games while driving, but for all listeners of any format on AM or FM to be able to connect with radio stations in new ways.

“The Audacy app makes us available anywhere,” said Austin.  “Our desktop player is also popular during work hours and the smart speaker has put the radio back in the home. Throw in our FM HD station and we feel we’re showing our audience we live in their world. As long as we maintain the standard with our content, our listeners will continue to seek us out.”

For those who still want to hear sports talk and live games on AM radio stations in your car, there is some good news as there is a bit of a political push back in Washington towards the trend of removing AM from new cars.

Last week, a group of more than 100 bi-partisan lawmakers introduced the AM For Every Vehicle Act.  If the legislation is passed, it would be music…and sports to the ears of 47 million Americans who listen to over 4,100 AM radio stations.  The act would ensure that automakers retain AM signals without charging an additional fee for it.

My memories of growing up listening to sports talk and sporting events are all because of AM radio.  Today, many people are listening to their favorite radio stations on their phone or other electronic device and they may have to use blue tooth technology to hear those radio stations in their cars.

It’s sad because while technology is good, especially for younger listeners, there’s still a charm of listening to AM radio in your car.

When I’m driving and I hear John Sterling say during a Yankees game “It is high…It is far…It is gone…All Rise…here come’s the Judge”, I’m generally listening to WFAN on AM radio.  While the station that I work for is also on FM, not all sports radio stations have made their way to FM which means they may soon not be available in your new car.

Unless the political intervention works, a glory era of radio could be coming to an end. 

The NFL Won’t Prioritize Fans Over Networks

0

You’re going to read this and think I am mocking Damon Amendolara. I am not. I like his show and I think he is a talented broadcaster. But the segment he did on Tuesday morning bemoaning the NFL’s lack of concern for its fans was either poor acting or the most naive thing I have ever heard.

I get the average fan being upset that a playoff game is going behind a paywall to become a Peacock exclusive. It is a big change and does feel like a betrayal. But DA is in the sports media business. You probably are too if you’re reading this. 

We all know the deal, right? The NFL and every other league, be they a major professional league or a college conference, don’t view Joe Six Pack as their customer. The networks are their customers. 

Sure, fans go to games and pay for tickets, souvenirs and refreshments. Tens of thousands of people doing that multiple times over the course of a season adds up. It’s not like the fans are not important, but no fan can swoop in and say “I’ll give you $110 million for a single game.” 

What is good for fans is less important to team owners and school presidents than what is good for networks. How is that news to anyone in this business? In 2023, it really shouldn’t even be news to the fans. 

This isn’t solely an NFL problem. The NHL and MLS both completed media rights deals in recent years that force their respective fan bases to invest in a way they never had to before in order to see every game they may want to. The Big Ten has a deal that will see eight Peacock exclusive football games this season. 

Just wait to see what the NBA does. The league wants to make $75 billion in its next media rights deal. Don’t you think a part of the path to getting there is going to be dangling a package of exclusive games to streamers?

Maybe the NFL Playoffs are sacred in this country in a way the rest of the sports calendar is not, but we did not break any new ground last week with the deal between the league and Peacock. Just ask Chris Russo how he feels about Apple TV+’s deal with Major League Baseball. Fans of every sport have a legitimate complaint about some of the games they used to be able to watch either for free or with their basic cable subscription now being inaccessible without shelling out an additional eight to fifteen dollars per month.

To me, there is an obvious question to ask and it isn’t “why?”. It’s “what’s next?”.

Nothing brings us to the television in real time the way major news and sporting events do. The NFL’s ratings prove that. It’s why the league can demand the kind of prices it does for its media rights. Rather than prioritize those old school Nielsen numbers that they can flash in front of networks and other advertising partners, team owners decided to see just how far they can push the fans.

Can exclusive rights to one of the league’s early playoff contests do for Peacock what the Premier League and one of Notre Dame’s guaranteed victories cannot? If there is anything that is going to make that service a must-have for sports fans, the NFL postseason is it, 

Now, that proverbial seal is broken.

So, why wouldn’t the Pac-12 be a prime candidate to put the bulk of its best football and basketball games on a streaming service? Why would the NBA bat an eye if Warner Bros. Discovery says that in order to get to the number the league wants, a select number of playoff games will have to be MAX exclusives? As the RSN model falls apart, why wouldn’t a team in Major League Baseball, the NHL or the NBA do a local media rights deal with Amazon? The Yankees already do it for a portion of the season. What if another team with a big national profile like the Atlanta Braves or St. Louis Cardinals looked at that and decided they could be a little bit bolder?

I don’t love the NFL’s deal with Peacock, and admittedly, it is hard to deny that it upends the status quo for sports consumption. I’m not shocked by it though. Weirdly, those thoughts can co-exist in my mind. 

It also isn’t a shortsighted move. NFL owners are doing what any good business people would. They are pushing the market as far as they can to see what it can bear. 

For them, the market is the networks and platforms willing to spend on NFL football exclusivity. If viewership drops below an acceptable level, that is the networks’ problem. The public is their customer base, not the league’s.

ESPN Doesn’t Have Problems You Were Told It Did, But Cable is About To

I don’t know the last time ESPN had as good of a week as it did last week.

With Pat McAfee announcing his wildly popular show will join the fray, and ESPN reportedly being ready to launch a direct-to-consumer product, the network is on top of the media world, despite going through thousands of layoffs.

I’m sure you’ve heard the phrase “Go woke, go broke”. ESPN has been tabbed as “woke” for many years, for reasons that we won’t go into here (if you’d like to have this discussion, email me, and we can argue about it for entirely too long and accomplish nothing). But, even the most ardent supporters of the stupid saying couldn’t argue that ESPN has “gone broke”. There are those that would like to tell you that because ESPN is going through layoffs the financial situation is obviously bad. Those people are morons.

ESPN makes $775 million a month on cable subscriptions. A month. Before they’ve brought in a single dime from advertising, or from the more than 25 million ESPN+ subscribers, the network starts off with a $775 million head start. Not bad for a “woke” organization that is supposed to be going broke.

The addition of The Pat McAfee Show will only solidify ESPN’s standing. The Herd with Colin Cowherd, widely regarded as the best national sports radio show, generally garners about 150-200,000 viewers each day on FS1. The Pat McAfee Show usually sees 275-325,000 viewers on his daily show, which only airs on YouTube. That number is going to explode on linear ESPN, in conjunction with airing on the ESPN YouTube page and ESPN+. It is already the most popular sports show. Having an expanded reach is only going to propel McAfee, and in turn, ESPN.

Additionally, if ESPN is ready to offer its product in a direct-to-consumer model, that could be disastrous for the cable bundle.

How many people do you know — and maybe this includes you — only continue to have cable so they can watch sports? ESPN has deals with the NFL, MLB, NHL, and NBA, and will soon be the sole home of SEC football. It also holds contracts with every Power 5 conference outside of the Big Ten, which will see at least three games air on over-the-air television each week.

If people can ditch cable and still have ESPN and everything that comes with it, cable providers are about to witness a bloodbath. With the rise of streaming services and the collapse of the regional sports network model outside of very select markets, how do you justify paying for cable when you could get a TV antenna, subscribe to a smattering of Netflix, Paramount+, Hulu, HBO Max, and ESPN, and have 85% of the stuff you want to watch covered for half the cost of cable?

It makes logical sense that ESPN offering its channels in an over-the-top model could be the biggest driver in cord-cutting we’ve ever seen.

So, ESPN will still make money from cable subscribers it will continue to have while opening a new revenue stream from those who currently can’t watch its channels without a cable subscription, and continuing to offer ESPN+ as a stand-alone package, and also a part of one of the most widely purchased streaming bundles in the Disney+, ad-supported Hulu, and ESPN+ bundle.

Jimmy Pitaro is about to be sitting in his office looking like this:

After a corporate restructuring, ESPN is its own division inside The Walt Disney Company. It will report its own financial earnings later this year, and people who believe the network is “going broke” because it went “woke” will be flabbergasted by the numbers.

The demise of ESPN has been greatly exaggerated. The network is operating from a place of strength, while others make up scenarios for why it’s going down the drain.

The news won’t remain sunshine and roses. Throughout the summer, hosts, reporters, and analysts alike will see their jobs cut, and negative headlines will return.

But there remains an undisputed king of the mountain in sports media. And it’s the Worldwide Leader.

Is The Radio Diary Dead?

0

Recent trade press articles disclosed that the paper version of the Nielsen Audio radio diary is to be killed off in the relatively near future, perhaps late in 2025.  

However, if you’re in a diary market and your ratings are poor, “late 2025” probably seems eons away. More than 200 metros, as well as the non-metro areas of the country, are dependent on the diary service, so any change in methodology matters. 

This week, I’ll look at how many years ago we ended up with a seven-day paper diary that is still being used in the mid-2020s. Next week, I’ll discuss the implications this change may have for the industry.

Contrary to at least one article, the then-Arbitron radio diary did not start during the Eisenhower administration. In fact, it was the Johnson administration. It’s always important to keep our presidents in the proper time perspective. The credit for inventing the diary, which began around 1965, is given to the late Bill McClenaghan during his time at Arbitron and who later spent many years as head of research for the ABC Radio Networks. Bill was a top-notch researcher but was also a classic curmudgeon. If he liked you, great. If he didn’t, well, one example I cite is when I had just been hired by the National Association of Broadcasters. 

It was 1987 and they told me to fly to NYC (I was still working on my doctorate in East Lansing) for an all-day research meeting with Birch/Scarborough ratings sponsored by the Radio Advertising Bureau and their one-time research committee, known as RAB GOALS. By early afternoon, things became testy and Bill, now at ABC, became upset, stood up, and said aloud to the Birch folks as well as the attendees, “F— you and f— your company”. 

He then walked out of the meeting. Some others left with him. Bob Galen, then head of research for the RAB, showing a look of resignation from the front row of the room, signaled to continue the meeting with those remaining. Years later, I asked Bill about that confrontation and his comment was “They lied to me”. Radio research was more of a blood sport back then. 

I’m stressing the word “paper” as the diary will still be around, but from what I’ve read, it’s simply a move to an online version, which by 2025, makes sense. You may be chuckling since almost everything we do is online, but the transition is not that simple. Again, some history is in order because the online diary has been a goal for radio audience measurement for at least twenty years. 

Any change in methodology will very likely change the results of a survey. If there is one thing that media outlets don’t like, it’s a change in results, unless the results favor you. PPM is an obvious example because if you were working in a market that transitioned from diary to PPM, your world became very different overnight. 

When Arbitron designed multiple versions of an electronic version of the diary around 2005-06 (pre-PPM), the “prime directive” from the relevant industry committees was to ensure there would be no changes in results. The online diary was offered to respondents as a choice in the Winter 2007 survey, but was stopped after two months (two phases). The reason was simple: we had one small design flaw (and I use “we” because I was heavily involved). 

When a respondent finished the seven days of the online version of the diary, the requirement was to click a “submit” button. A relatively high percentage finished the diary but didn’t click “submit”. That reduced the return rate which drove the operations people nuts because they were missing their goals. By the way, in 2007, when given a choice, only around five percent of diary keepers chose the online version over paper. Rather than fixing the issue, the initial E-Diary was tossed on the scrap heap of radio measurement history. 

Next was Project Leapfrog which began around 2010 and was designed to change the entire system including an online component. From my perspective at that time, Project Leapfrog had about as much likelihood of coming to fruition as me becoming Fox News’ choice to replace Tucker Carlson. When Leapfrog was finally (and quietly) killed off, my side bet with an Arbitron colleague gave me the opportunity to say “I told you so” with a large smile on my face. 

Now it’s 2023 and Nielsen Audio is talking publicly about the end of the paper diary, perhaps in 2025. The local TV diary, which lasted well beyond its ability to measure television viewing by perhaps 20-25 years, was finally given a proper burial by Nielsen in 2017, but the alternatives available to Nielsen to replace the TV diary don’t exist in radio or audio measurement. 

In the next column, we’ll talk about what might happen when the paper radio diary goes online.

Mike Ricordati Signs Contract Extension at 97.1 The Fan

0

Things are changing at 97.1 The Fan. That is why everyone in the building has to be happy to hear that Mike Ricordati is sticking around.

Ricordati has a new deal that will keep him in Columbus through 2026. That is good news to the bosses at Tegna, as the group braces for life without Todd Markiewicz, who will leave the station at the end of the week.

“It’s a strange time,” Ricordati told BSM. “We’re a radio station owned by a tv company, and that tv company is going through a very public and complicated sale.”

Mike Ricordati is not only the co-host of the station’s afternoon show. He is also the Director of Content and Image. Under his leadership, 97.1 The Fan has seen some of the best ratings it ever has. He says that his questions about the station’s future are not about whether the content is good. It is about what happens without Markiewicz.

He also said that re-signing was not a guarantee. He thought long and hard about what he would do if he left The Fan.

“I’m fortunate that I had some options,” he said. “I spoke with podcast entities and considered going that route on my own. I’m not ruling that out in the future, but I didn’t feel like now was the right time. Every time I told myself I was finished, I couldn’t shake this sense of abandonment. With Todd leaving, I couldn’t walk out the door too.”

Ricordati has been on the air at 97.1 The Fan since December of 2003. He assumed his current role in late 2018.

Michael Kay: ‘It Stinks’ We Can’t Get Ratings Off of National Audience

0

98.7 ESPN New York host Michael Kay recently noticed an uptick in callers to his show from out of state, which he’s very appreciative of. He loves that his program reaches audiences across the country.

But on Friday’s edition of The Michael Kay Show, he said he hates that the national audience doesn’t help the show in terms of local ratings.

“We’ve got calls from LA, Florida, North Carolina. We’re reaching more people nationally,” Kay said. “But those people don’t have meters it stinks!”

“The show’s really popular, but yeah we can’t get a rating off them,” co-host Don La Greca responded. “We’re getting calls all over the place!”

Kay’s program goes head-to-head against Carton & Roberts on WFAN for three hours each day. BSM’s major market winter ratings recap published earlier this month showed Craig Carton and Evan Roberts coming in 3rd place, with Kay coming in 15th.