Advertisement
Tuesday, September 24, 2024
Jim Cutler Voiceovers
Barrett Media Member of the Week

UPCOMING EVENTS

ESPN Struck Out Interrupting College Football For Aaron Judge At-Bats

One thing you quickly learn in this business is that you will never please everyone. If you try to be all things to all people, you often end up failing everyone. That can often put an organization like ESPN in a difficult spot. They are heavily invested in live sports play-by-play but are also the video outlet of record for any breaking sports news.

Never has this tension been more apparent for ESPN than it was in Saturday’s early slate of college football. While Clemson was playing Wake Forest in a key early season ACC game on ABC, Auburn was hosting Missouri in a “Coaching Hot Seat Special” on ESPN. At the same time, Aaron Judge was continuing his chase for the magical number of 61 home runs on the YES Network.

- Advertisement -

When I was a kid, Sammy Sosa and Mark McGwire had not yet passed the Roger Maris Major League home run mark. Any time a player passed the 50 homer mark, that became the story of the summer. I often wondered if anyone would ever pass 61 but that happened that one magical summer, the summer many credit with saving baseball, when Sosa and McGwire both assaulted it.

The American League, and Yankees, home run record still remains at 61, so Judge’s chase doesn’t lack historical significance but does feel a little hollow. I can only speak for myself but Judge’s chase for 61 feels like an “if I’m at home with nothing else to do, I’d like to see that at-bat” type of chase.

That was not the case Saturday and ESPN chose to serve up those at-bats right in the middle of their college football games. During the action of both the ABC and ESPN games, the Worldwide Leader chose to go with a double box of the football and Judge’s at-bats with the audio of Michael Kay’s call on the YES Network.

- Advertisement -

Now, if you don’t know much about the Southern football fan, they don’t even allow their football Saturdays to be interrupted by family weddings. I’m not even exaggerating. A Fall wedding in the Deep South is about as common as 62 home runs in a season. Fans are only guaranteed 12 weekends of football and they live the other 40 weeks dreaming about those 12 weeks. If you want me to see you get married, or hit your 61st homer, do it when I’m not watching football.

The most common reaction I saw to this was the understandable, “If I wanted to watch baseball, I’d be watching baseball.” I find it a reasonable reaction to what ESPN chose to do. We no longer live in a world in which we can’t watch a Yankees game anywhere in America. Sure, in 1998 when McGwire and Sosa were chasing history, MLB Extra Innings was only two years old. The opportunity to watch Cubs or Cardinals games then was much more limited.

Not to mention, you know, McGwire and Sosa were chasing actual Major League Baseball history. Judge is chasing Yankees history. Anyone that deeply cares about that would be well aware of the fact they could watch it on YES Network. Auburn, Missouri, Wake Forest and Clemson fans were doing just that; watching the game the only place they could.

- Advertisement -

My surprise in ESPN’s miscalculation here is their lack of grasp of the fact that the people watching these two college football games fall mainly into two groups. Group one: viewers emotionally invested in the success or failure of Clemson, Wake Forest, Auburn or Missouri. Group two: people financially invested in the success or failure of Clemson, Wake Forest, Auburn or Missouri. 

I have to think the crossover between those two groups and the group of people that deeply care about Aaron Judge’s 61st home run is very small, if not non-existent. That is the risk you run when you try to be all things to all people, you eventually upset everyone.

Why not just show the Judge at-bats on ESPNNews? That is ESPN’s catch-all channel anyway. How many college football games start on ESPNNews and the ESPN app because ESPN can’t accept the fact that 90% of college games last longer than three and a half hours? That way, if I care at all, and have no access to YES Network, I have my options.

The objection would be that the college football fans only missed minimal action but that misses the main point. As a consumer of college football, I can tell you the fans want to think the game you are showing them is the most important thing to your network at that time. It is why they hate when your announcers turn play-by-play into a sports talk show, or when you waste their time with meaningless sideline interviews, or when you miss plays to show things that don’t impact the outcome of their game.

There is no doubt just pleasing your target audience is hard enough as it is. Why make that even more difficult by trying to serve an audience that, if they cared that deeply about a Yankees’ home run record, would probably be watching YES Network anyway? ESPN would call it breaking news, I would call it a lack of situational awareness by ESPN.

Either way, ESPN was trying to be all things to all people. When you try to please everyone, you often end up scheduling a Fall wedding.

- Advertisement -
Ryan Brown
Ryan Brownhttps://nextroundlive.com/
Ryan Brown is a columnist for Barrett Sports Media, and a co-host of the popular sports audio/video show 'The Next Round' formerly known as JOX Roundtable, which previously aired on WJOX in Birmingham. You can find him on Twitter @RyanBrownLive and follow his show @NextRoundLive.

2 COMMENTS

  1. I’m certain the reaction would be the same even if it was an MLB record he was chasing. CFB Is sacred ground, especially in the southeast. The access for out of market games we have available now as a point is spot on. I also think it’s an indication of where MLB now falls in the order of popularity for sports.

  2. “The objection would be that the college football fans only missed minimal action” is actually inaccurate. The first split screen Clemson/Wake game, we missed a key call on Targeting, the second a Wake touchdown and the third, we missed a two point conversion by Clemson. Definitely a very poor decision by ESPN.

Comments are closed.

Popular Articles