Supreme Court to Consider Nielsen Appeal in Cumulus Antitrust Case

The Supreme Court scheduled Nielsen's petition for a November 13 conference, when justices will consider hearing its antitrust dispute with Cumulus Media.

Date:

Nielsen has asked the Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling favoring Cumulus Media in their antitrust dispute. The radio ratings battle is now scheduled for the justices’ November 13 conference.

What We Know:  The Supreme Court scheduled Nielsen’s petition for a November 13 conference. The justices will consider whether to hear its antitrust dispute with Cumulus Media. Cumulus sued in October 2025, alleging Nielsen unlawfully tied its national Nationwide ratings to local ratings purchases. Cumulus wanted to keep national ratings for Westwood One while using rival Eastlan Ratings in certain local markets.

- Advertisement -

However, Nielsen then offered standalone Nationwide access at what’s reportedly ten times Cumulus’ previous rate. As a result, U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas of the Southern District of New York issued a preliminary injunction in December. It blocks Nielsen’s policy and prohibits commercially unreasonable standalone pricing. The Second Circuit upheld the ruling in July and denied rehearing in August. Nielsen then petitioned the Supreme Court in September, arguing the ruling conflicts with other appeals court decisions.

Meanwhile, Cumulus waived its right to respond unless the Court requests one, and two outside groups backed Nielsen’s petition. Separately, the Second Circuit stayed an enforcement order that threatened Nielsen with $50,000 in daily penalties. Moreover, the original injunction remains in effect.

What Remains Unclear: It’s uncertain whether the Supreme Court will agree to hear Nielsen’s appeal or leave the preliminary injunction in place. Meanwhile, the separate dispute over standalone Nationwide pricing remains unresolved. Finally, It’s unclear whether the outcome will encourage more broadcasters to consider competing local ratings providers like Eastlan.

What It Means: The dispute could change how broadcasters purchase radio ratings in the future. If Cumulus ultimately prevails, stations could gain more flexibility to choose different providers for national and local ratings. That could create opportunities for smaller competitors like Eastlan while potentially putting pressure on Nielsen’s pricing practices. For Cumulus, a favorable outcome could provide greater control over ratings expenses while maintaining access to Nielsen’s national data for Westwood One. Beyond radio, Nielsen argues the ruling could have broader implications for how businesses bundle and price their services.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

- Advertisement -
Michael Krantz
Michael Krantzhttps://barrettmedia.com
Michael Krantz is a daily news writer for Barrett Media. His background includes experience in sports writing, content production, affiliate relations, and digital publishing. Prior to joining Barrett, Michael worked for iHeart Media as a sports producer, where he wrote and produced sports updates for 40+ major markets including New York, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Dallas. Additionally, as an integral part of the affiliate relations team at Krantz Media Group (KMG), Michael specialized in direct station outreach, pitching independent program directors and major market station groups for clearances of premium syndicated content, including the critically acclaimed "John Lennon: The Final Interview" radio special (30th anniversary commemorative program). He can be reached by email at krantzmk1991@gmail.com.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Next Article