“It’s an exciting time for Illinois athletics, and I’m ever grateful for the opportunity to connect with listeners and fans. We’ll talk again soon.”
In addition to his daily sports talk show, Scott Beatty serves as the play-by-play voice for Illinois Fighting Illini baseball, as well as other assorted sports broadcast on the BTN+ streaming platform. He’s held that position since 2016.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.
The situation between CNN and the Trump administration has entered another day as Stephen Miller continues to argue he’s been banned by the network.
Earlier this week, Miller told Fox News’ Sean Hannity that he had been banned by CNN from appearing on any of its shows after he had been continually offered as a guest.
In response, CNN denied those accusations, stating that Miller was welcome to appear when he was relevant to news programming.
The White House then responded by lobbing insults at the network.
White House Director of Communications Steven Cheung took to social media to blast the network for failing to bring the U.S. Homeland Security Advisor on for a third straight day.
“DAY 3: The White House has again made Stephen Miller available to CNN for a third day (any time, any show, any topic),” Cheung wrote. “They have declined, presumably because they are scared Stephen will school them and call out Fake News. CNN = Chicken News Network.”
DAY 3: The White House has again made Stephen Miller @StephenM available to CNN for a third day (any time, any show, any topic). They have declined, presumably because they are scared Stephen will school them and call out Fake News.
Vice President JD Vance also commented on the situation, stating that “If CNN wants to be a real news network it should feature important voices from our administration.”
That led the network to issue a response, echoing similar statements it had made surrounding the topic.
“Members of the administration, including Stephen Miller, are welcome to come on our air,” the statement read. “As a news organization, we make editorial decisions about the stories we cover and when, and that depends on the news priorities of the day. We look forward to having Stephen on again in the future as the news warrants.”
Paul Finebaum wasn’t shy about considering a run for the open Senate seat in Alabama. But the longtime ESPN host ultimately decided against a bid for the office. He’s now shared what swayed him against it.
In an appearance on The Takeout with Major Garrett, Finebaum said one key factor led him to determine the run for the Senate wasn’t in the cards.
“I’m just going to paraphrase the political operatives’ words: ‘you need to run against woke Disney,'” Finebaum said he was told. “And I could not do it. I could not burn down the place I had worked for the last 13 years. It had given me an opportunity as a Birmingham talk show host. Whatever you may think of Disney — and plenty of people have opinions, Disney owns ESPN, for those of you who don’t know — I couldn’t do it.
“I had several very prominent people — including two senators, sitting senators — tell me, ‘That’s your path.’ There are many other paths, obviously, to win a primary in Alabama, but they thought that was the cleanest path.”
Paul Finebaum revealed that a conversation with his wife made it clear that wasn’t something he was willing to do.
Longtime SEC college football analyst Paul Finebaum briefly considered a career change earlier in 2025 and came close to launching a Republican Senate bid in Alabama. He tells CBS News’ Major Garrett why he ultimately decided against it. https://t.co/u1d9nJbL6ipic.twitter.com/ko2W6Cty0r
“In the end, that factor alone, that was at the top of the pyramid,” Finebaum said, before continuing with the reasons why he opted against chasing the nomination and office.
“Secondarily, was saying things that I just was not comfortable with. You can say whatever you want about me, ‘polarizing’, ‘mouth of the South’, ‘always ripping coaches’, but the one thing I’ve always wanted to do on a program is bring people together and let them fight within, under the tent. I couldn’t get up there and just draw a line and say, ‘I’m for you and I’m against you.’ It was against everything in the fiber of my body.”
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.
Veteran media executive Scott Musgrave has been announced as the latest member of the RadioAnalyzer team, leading up operations in North America.
Most recently, Musgrave has served as the Senior Vice President of Client Solutions at Coleman Insights. He took that position after previously working as the Head of U.S. Radio for BDS Radio at Luminate, and 17 years with Arbitron and later Nielsen Audio, where he spent nine years as Vice President of Sales, Senior Vice President, and General Manager overseeing the company’s radio business.
“RadioAnalyzer have been successful with the biggest European broadcasters for more than a decade, helping them grow and thrive, so this feels like the perfect time for US and Canadian radio to take advantage of their tools and methods,” Musgrave said. “I honestly can’t wait to showcase them to the broadcasters here.”
“We’ve spent the last years growing audience share and engagement for successful stations around the world, and are excited to bring our suite of tools to even more broadcasters looking to grow, by optimizing content and music playlists using real-time behavioral data,” added RadioAnalyzer CEO and co-founder Mikkel Ottesen Lønstrup. “We are sure Scott’s expertise, paired with our unique methodology, will greatly benefit the radio industry in North America.”
Launched in 2013, RadioAnalyzer bills itself as a “next-generation analytics company built for radio professionals by radio professionals.”
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.
College football thrives on drama. Whether it’s coaches changing teams during the season, players racing to the transfer portal for gobs of cash, or conferences discarding long-standing traditions. This year, the biggest spectacle didn’t come from a sideline meltdown but from Notre Dame’s decision to forgo postseason play after a 10–2 campaign and a ten-game winning streak, even as the sport’s new 12-team College Football Playoff left them at the doorstep. The Irish, college football’s most storied independent, chose to pout and stay home rather than compete in a bowl, igniting debates about the consequences for bowl season as a whole.
To gauge the real impact of Notre Dame’s absence, it’s crucial to recognize the program’s stature. Valued at $1.85 billion—fourth only to Texas, Georgia, and Ohio State—and generating around $143 million in annual revenue, Notre Dame isn’t just a football team; it’s an institution with nationwide reach and its own longstanding NBC TV contract.
NBC’s coverage of Notre Dame, while not quite the juggernaut of decades past, still commands significant viewership:
Recent seasons averaged 3.49 million viewers—the best in years.
The 2025 Texas A&M–Notre Dame clash drew 6.2 million, peaking at 9.4 million.
On August 31, Miami–Notre Dame on ESPN pulled a robust 10.8 million viewers. (Miami won 27–24, which is why the Hurricanes are in and the Irish are out of the playoff.)
In short, Notre Dame still moves the needle—just not quite to the level they once did.
If the Irish were left out of the playoff party, most projections had Notre Dame meeting BYU in the Pop-Tarts Bowl—a prime-time holiday showcase one could only describe as the “Religious Super Bowl.” Headlines practically wrote themselves. Television producers were ready for the meme potential of “Mormons vs. Catholics.” But when Notre Dame was slotted as the “first team out” (No. 11 in a 12-team field), they opted out entirely, leaving the Pop-Tarts Bowl with a top-25 matchup of BYU vs. Georgia Tech.
While still a solid pairing, the game lost some of its made-for-TV sizzle. The question is: Did that really hurt bowl season?
In terms of viewership, the Pop-Tarts Bowl has been a strong performer regardless of participants. Last year’s Iowa State 42–41 thriller over Miami drew 6.8 million viewers—the bowl’s best number since 2008 and the highest non–New Year’s Six (NY6) bowl audience for ESPN in years. Most mid-tier bowls average between 2.7 and 4.4 million viewers, but the Pop-Tarts Bowl typically lands in the 6–7 million range.
Notre Dame’s recent mid-level bowl appearances have also been ratings wins. The 2022 Gator Bowl featuring the Irish drew 5.8 million viewers—the top non-NY6 figure in nearly a decade. Had Notre Dame played BYU, the game likely would have stretched to 7.5 or even 8 million viewers, especially with the “Mormons vs. Catholics” promotional push.
But even with the Irish absent, BYU–Georgia Tech is expected to attract 5–6 million viewers—a figure that surpasses every NBA game that week, every NHL contest for the year, and nearly any non-NFL sports broadcast. The takeaway: Notre Dame raises the ceiling but doesn’t set the floor. Bowl season doesn’t collapse without them; it simply misses out on a few extra memes and a modest ratings bump.
Some fans and columnists have speculated that ESPN, which holds the rights to both the SEC and the College Football Playoff, may have subtly influenced Notre Dame’s exclusion. After all:
The SEC landed five teams in the playoff.
Notre Dame’s home games air on NBC, not ESPN.
ESPN’s financial interests are intertwined with both the SEC and the playoff.
However, the reality isn’t as complicated or juicy:
Miami beat Notre Dame head-to-head, providing the selection committee with a clear tiebreaker.
ESPN has benefited from Notre Dame’s ratings, especially with last year’s 17.8 million–viewer Orange Bowl win over Penn State.
Several of Notre Dame’s road and neutral-site games still air on ESPN.
While ESPN certainly roots for the SEC—given its $300 million annual investment—it also values Notre Dame’s drawing power. The network isn’t trying to exclude the Irish; it’s trying to maximize the overall appeal of its football inventory. Sometimes what looks like conspiracy is simply a confluence of business interests and competitive outcomes.
Notre Dame skipping the Pop-Tarts Bowl is like Taylor Swift skipping the Grammys. It makes the event a bit less glitzy and dramatic, but the show goes on. The Irish’s absence may cost the bowl 10–20% of its potential audience and some marketing opportunities, but the overall bowl season remains robust.
From last bowl season:
Mid-tier bowls averaged over 2.7 million viewers.
Top non-NY6 matchups drew 4–7 million.
Nearly 200 million total bowl viewers tuned in across the season.
College football fans tune in for the bowls because they’re tradition, comfort food, and readily available entertainment—regardless of which teams participate.
Notre Dame’s bowl-season sit-out doesn’t upend the sport. It won’t crater ESPN’s ratings or financials. It doesn’t even “ruin” the Pop-Tarts Bowl; it just made the sugar rush a little less intense. The real legacy of Notre Dame’s absence is a reminder of what bowls have become: content, inventory, and football-themed television programming. In this case when the $1.85 billion brand chooses to abstain, it’s about protest and pride. But more teams in the future will opt out, like Iowa State, Kansas State and Baylor did this season. Key players have been doing it for years now, protecting their bodies for the NFL draft.
As long as there’s football on TV—and a dancing pastry mascot—the bowls will continue to draw viewers. That happens with or without Notre Dame’s blessing. The Irish can sulk, stay home, and overvalue their importance in this ever-evolving college football landscape. The rest of us will still be watching.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.
I once had to coach a radio morning show — a good morning show — that wanted nothing to do with me. I eventually won them over, but it didn’t start great.
They had a daily benchmark called “Hilarious Theater.” It was often funny, but almost never hilarious. I told the main host it was a good concept, don’t lose it, but the setup/name did two things that could be problematic.
It creates an impossible expectation of constant hilarity. That’s a high bar to clear every morning.
Humor is subjective. What Jenny on the block finds hilarious may cause Sally in the alley to cringe.
I wasn’t being overly literal, even though the audience often is. The goal was to avoid situations where listeners expect one thing and get something different. Like when you’re promised amazing pasta and just get basic spaghetti.
The host disagreed and kept everything the same.
It wasn’t just the name of the benchmark. The bit itself had a big, long, overproduced intro that all but promised the second coming of all Comedy Gods were on the way.
Months later, the show got the chance to hear direct feedback from listeners in a focus group when I played “Hilarious Theater” (and other segments) for the room. I’ll paraphrase but not exaggerate — the general response from the room was:
“It’s OK, but not hilarious. They should call it ‘trying to be hilarious theater.’”
Focus group attendees are ruthless and never easily impressed. The point though stuck: don’t ruin a good payoff with an overzealous setup.
This isn’t just a morning show thing. It’s everywhere.
All programmers can relate to the uber-hyped setups they hear for a new single going for adds: “Amazing! Wait ‘til you hear it, I can’t stop listening — might be the song of the year!”
You’ve heard your friends rev you up: “OMG, you will NOT believe what JUST happened to me!” Followed by a story that’s both believable and kinda boring.
The problem here isn’t striving to be hilarious or being excited to share. It’s the approach. The moment we label something EPIC, MASSIVE, HILARIOUS, BEST, UNBELIVABLE, OMG — we’re writing checks that are hard to cash. Restraint is often better.
“Maybe Not Hilarious Theater” would be more likeable. It’s self-aware, disarming, honest and human. It still signals humor is coming without promising you’ll be ROTFLYAO.
Your friend simply saying, “I want to tell you what happened to me,” would get your attention but not make you expect you’re about to hear how he got stuck in an elevator with Sydney Sweeney.
Hyped set-ups are everywhere. Ad agencies and marketers are famous for creating their super amazing and super spectacular set-ups. Stopsets at Radio and TV are jammed with sensational setups:
• “Our biggest sale ever.” (But it’s the same sale from last month.) • “Two-For-One Blowout All Weekend.” (But it’s always Two-for-One.) • Football fans know “LAST CHANCE NFL DEALS” actually get better each week.
It’s natural to want to create excitement, urgency or to convey “bigness”. Just make sure it’s for the right moment and that the payoff meets the promise.
• Let’s not run the edgy “THIS IS ROCK” production piece going into “Under the Bridge.” • Let’s not say we’re Alternative going into the most mainstream song of the hour. • Let’s not shout “45 minutes non-stop” when there’s only one song left in the sweep. • How about we don’t call it “Hilarious Theater” when it’s likely not hilarious to many. • And maybe the circus promo shouldn’t sound like it’s Rush’s final tour.
In the end, “Hilarious Theater” disappeared, but the solid concept remained. By not trying so hard to be so funny, the show actually got funnier.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.
Off-Mic is a special 5-part series, created by Corey Dylan for Barrett Media. This series examines how to adjust if faced with unexpected job loss. Corey becomes a radio free agent later this month and is exploring her new way forward. Interested groups are encouraged to reach out by email at Contact@CoreyDylan.com. To submit ideas to Barrett Media for future considerations, please contact Jason@BarrettMedia.com. We can’t promise we will publish what’s turned in but we do review all submissions.
You’ve taken the hit, done the work, and started to rebuild. Now comes the landing. It might not be where you expected, but somewhere that fits who you’ve become and it’s fulfilling in a way that surprises you.
Redefine “Success”
Careers today are nonlinear. You might juggle voiceover work, podcast consulting, and part-time radio. That’s not instability; it’s adaptability.
Interview With Confidence
Frame your layoff as a turning point, not a failure:
“Like many in our industry, I used that transition to reassess my skills and learn new ways to tell stories.”
That projects resilience and forward motion.
Stay Curious
The media landscape is changing fast with AI tools, social storytelling, social selling, niche podcasts, branded content. Stay plugged in, stay curious, and you’ll keep finding new ways to use your talent.
Takeaway
A layoff isn’t an ending. It’s a rewrite. The next chapter may look different, but it can be richer and more creative and fulfilling than ever.
Your radio background gave you the hardest skills to teach – communication, connection, adaptability, and performance under pressure in an oversaturated landscape. Those skills translate directly into the booming $400 billion-plus creator economythat is rewarding storytellers who can build trust and engagement.
You’ve been preparing for this era your entire career. You’re not “off-mic.” You’re just broadcasting on a new frequency.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.
In 2025, my own media consumption followed the trends that took place throughout nation. We all experienced a steady shift from traditional media consumption to on-demand streaming and audio. By no means was it a complete swap out. It’s just that listeners and viewers changed how they use content. They balanced older platforms and habits with newer formats more than ever before. Don’t be mistaken though. Content created on traditional media is still the mega-giant player it has always been. So what shifts did we see in 2025 and how will they impact 2026?
Streaming Eclipses Traditional TV
One of the biggest milestones of the year was reached by streaming TV. For the first time ever, Nielsen reported that streaming services accounted for more total TV usage than the combined share of broadcast and cable. By May 2025, streaming accounted for about 45% of all viewing. Broadcast and cable together were slightly lower at 44%. The difference was almost negligible, but it must be noted. Again, the content of the traditional TV networks still has large viewership. It’s just that the delivery systems are more diverse.
TV viewers have seemed to move in favor of the flexibility streaming offers over the fixed schedules associated with broadcast and cable. Streaming platforms, from the major subscription-based companies to the FAST (free, ad-supported streaming television) and AVOD (advertising video-on-demand) made their way into more homes in 2025 and received more viewing every day. If you’re anything like me, this translated into much more binge-watching, watching shows on my own time, and choosing more diverse content.
Companies like CBS/Paramount+ and NBC/Peacock offer both platforms to viewers. My wife and I watch most any CBS program now on Paramount+ since those shows on the local CBS station run commercial free on Paramount+. Many Paramount+ shows like Landman, Lioness, and Tulsa King do not run on the CBS TV Network. 2025 often saw new, hybrid habits created with streaming occurring at times and old-school TV for news, sports, or habitual watching at other times.
Audio Remains Powerful
On the audio side, 2025 turned out to be a strong year. Digital audio listening hit record highs. According to a National Public Media survey, 79% of Americans listened monthly to digital audio (which includes streaming radio, podcasts, and music services), and 73% listened weekly. Podcasts also gained some ground. Roughly 55% of Americans said they listened to a podcast monthly and 40% said they listened weekly. Meanwhile, Nielsen reported that the typical American spent almost 4-hours a day listening to audio content across platforms including radio, streaming music, and podcasts.
Despite the digital audio growth, traditional AM/FM radio (including online streams) was a major audio source. In early 2025, Edison Research reported that radio accounted for about two-thirds of daily “ad-supported” time spent listening, with the remainder split among podcasts, streaming music, and satellite listening. Nielsen shows that even among younger 18-34 year-olds, radio still has a substantial share. Its podcast shares though are growing faster in that demo. AM/FM Radio controls even more usage in cars.
For most media consumers, 2025 meant more choice than ever before. As a result, people could switch among streaming platforms, enabling us all to watch a new show, binge-watch a library series, and then catch up on a live event. We have combined audio formats for music and podcasts and still tune in to AM/FM radio for local radio’s benefits. In 2025 we also mixed video and audio content with podcasts, adding more flexibility. We listened on our phones, watched on our TVs or tablets, or switched up depending on mood, location and content.
2026 Expectations
This newer menu style of media is reshaping our landscape. In 2025 many people began to think in terms of, “what do I want, when do I want it, and what fits my schedule best at the time.”
Looking ahead, what should we expect in 2026 and what trends will influence us? Streaming’s dominance will certainly increase as more viewers, especially younger ones, grow accustomed to on-demand and anytime viewing while traditional cable and broadcast will likely shrink further. New shows, movies, and live events will increasingly appear on streaming platforms, or simulcast both.
Audio continues to fragment but also expand. Podcasts and streaming music services will keep growing, especially among Zoomers and Millennials who seek out the flexibility of streaming. Radio will remain important, especially for local and regional content and in-car use. Its total share may have to give some space to other platforms, but in-car listening is still the big winner in the time spent listening game.
Hybrid consumption will certainly forge forward as people increasingly mix video-on-demand, live TV, podcasts, music streaming, and traditional radio depending on need and context. That means habits will evolve and old assumptions about “prime time” or “drive time” may matter less.
The role of live and local content shifts will continue for traditional providers. Staying relevant means broadcasters must emphasize our local communities including news, entertainment, and live events. That means a focus on all types of content that streaming and algorithms can’t easily replicate.
There’s no denying that 2025 was a watershed year. As we move into 2026, we should expect that hybrid, flexible, and on-demand consumption will continue. Convenience, technology, and variety will continue to drive it.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.
There are several folk tales people love to tell in radio. When you ask for actual examples though the details are scarce. Things like how everyone, at least in Rock, once worked at a station where the morning host used to ride his motorcycle up and down the hallways. Everyone talks about it, not many people can say when or where it happened. Few even know how the motorcycle got through the front door.
Another tale often told is about the Program Director who goes to a bar or restaurant and meets someone so funny and talented they are just destined to be a radio star. They hire that person and the unsuspecting civilian blossoms into a successful personality. That always seemed like a myth told around the radio campfire, until Maria Palmer, co-host of The Morning Mosh Pit on Rock 95.5 in Chicago, came along.
Ten years ago when Palmer was studying acting, she worked at a dive bar in the Washington DC area. iHeartMedia Senior Regional Vice President James Howard came into the bar one night wearing a DC 101 hat. “I was already very familiar with the station. I guess he enjoyed my bartending, and probably the free shots of whiskey I gave him.” The rest, as they say, is Rock Radio history. “We exchanged contact information, he offered me a job, and I accepted.”
At that point, Palmer realized she had no idea what she had agreed to. “I started to wonder, ‘what am I doing?’ Yes, I’m here but I would love a little more definition.” Unlike the myth, which tells a story of the person coming in and instantly shining as a high profile personality, Howard started her off with the basics. They discussed the goal of Palmer having her own show. Howard then explained what steps needed to be taken to get there.
“I said great, let’s take those steps. I ran the board for the Bobby Bones syndicated show, literally learning how to flip the on switch. Then I took every shift I could from there on and here we are now.”
And to be clear, true to the myth, Palmer wasn’t trolling for radio jobs when she met Howard. She had always been creative. She was studying acting hoping to get into performing. But she wasn’t sure what that was going to look like. “I didn’t know exactly what lane that was going to take yet, and then the lane chose the car.”
Nearly a year ago she segued from night host to mornings on Rock 95.5 with co-hosts Marris and Michael Mason. She likens launching the show to having a blank coloring book and a set of crayons. “I’m just sort of coloring as I go,” shared Palmer.
While that may seem like a lot of freedom, she says the team has been given lines to color inside of. She explains how Howard has set the tone while allowing them to do things their way. “That’s not easy to do, and certainly not with me. I’m a weird individual. I can’t even manage myself.”
Palmer says the show has evolved so much over the course of their first year. It’s hard to distill it down in a way that can be easily explained. “I supposed you could say it has gone from chaos to a little more organized chaos.”
That may sound like a recipe for disaster to some people, but for Palmer it’s the perfect environment.
“What makes our show work, which we definitely want to keep, is that chaos. It’s the feeling that we don’t know what the hell is going on, but we know we’re going to have fun, and the audience is going to have fun listening to it.”
Unlike some shows that try to project chaos but script everything, Palmer says the team’s magic comes not from overly preparing but from knowing the listeners and each other. “We kind of know that the audience wants to hear and what we can speak upon.”
Palmer is also active in another chaotic world away from the studio – social media. She says it doesn’t necessarily line up cleanly with mornings. “Not all my morning show content works on social media. Some does but in many ways they are two completely different skill sets.”
As most content creators know, that is only complicated by the constantly changing algorithms of the different platforms. “What does work well might only work for six months and then you have to switch it up. Which is another reason I love my audience. I have an awesome core group that sticks with me, regardless of the algorithm. I’m incredibly grateful for it.”
They even stuck with Palmer when Meta banned her for videos she made for a personal injury law firm. The premise was that people can get hurt at work, which she illustrated. “Yeah, Zuckerberg did not like that. He was like, ‘hey, that’s self-harm.’ And I was like, ‘yeah, but it’s a joke.’” In the end Instagram didn’t find it funny. Palmer’s content wasn’t available for quite a while, but she only lost about one thousand followers over that time. To her it was a lesson in what matters in any media, not just social. “It’s the nature of show business in general. What works is connecting with your audience on a real level.”
But to have any discussion of Palmer’s social media requires talking about Thirstday, a weekly Thursday staple that has gone through several iterations dating back to when she was hosting nights. It started with doing short interviews with representatives from local bars and breweries, but she started to run out of people to talk with.
“I thought we were losing the plot here. It’s a whole day all about drinking.” She wanted to turn it into a weekly remote. “I wanted to go out to the bars partially because I was bored sitting by myself in the studio at night.” But, as with many radio ideas, the budget wouldn’t support it.
The following week, with nothing planned for Thirstday she hit on an idea. “I am a little sister, so I thought I’m going to make this a whole thing where I annoy my way out of the studio. They’ll be forced to send me to a bar because it’ll be better than me being on air.”
That’s when the Thirstday jingle was created. “I found a really annoying piano track in the music library. Then I added a very annoyingly vocal, ’It’s Rock 95-5 Thirstday’ over it.”
That was only supposed to last a couple of weeks. However, it caught on to the point where listeners started sending instruments to the studio for her to play as part of the jingle each week. Now, Palmer has finally gotten her wish. Thirstday Live has been born with the morning show going out to bars and meeting people.
But not everything about her social media efforts has been as positive. There is a downside to being a woman on the internet. Palmer faces a large amount of general creepiness from men in her social feeds. “I like my job and understand the need to have a social media presence, but it does mean I have to subject myself to a level of sexual harassment.”
She has, however, found a way to turn it into great content with the invention of purge month. Each day for a month Palmer spotlights a creepy, awful comment she has received on her social feeds. “The beauty is it takes away the predatory nature of those comments because a lot of them are trying to catch me off guard or make me feel uncomfortable. But if I’m expecting it, and even egging it on, that kind of takes the fun out of it for the guys really trying to be hurtful.”
She thinks of it as holding up a mirror to show them how ridiculous their behavior is. “It says you can’t be disrespecting me like that every day but also, some of this is phenomenal creative writing and I can’t hate on it.”
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.
It’s the time of year when radio stations are trying to wrap up 2025, find fill-in bodies, schedule out the rest of the year, and reset for a few days before it’s full steam ahead into 2026. And as we look ahead to 2026, much has been written on this site and elsewhere about digital strategies for radio brands, which is a long-overdue conversation that needs more attention. But if you need some data to back it up, I’ll bring it to you here.
Edison Research’s quarterly “Share of Ear” study, in its 11th year, surveyed 4,000 Americans annually to measure daily reach and time spent for all forms of audio. The good news is that AM/FM radio dominates ad-supported audio with a 64% share, followed by podcasts (20%). Radio remains undervalued, but it’s indisputable that listeners continue to shift toward time-shifted listening and podcasts.
As older demographics flock to podcasts, the median age of the podcast audience has aged sharply from 29 in 2017 to 39 in 2025. As noted in the study, in 2017, podcasts’ daily reach was greatest among 18–24s. Eight years later, podcasts’ daily reach has grown significantly, particularly among older demographics. The older the age group, the greater the growth in the podcast daily audience. Today, podcasts’ greatest reach centers on 25–44s, with significant growth among 45–64s.
That means the 35–64 crowd, the core of many News/Talk audiences, is also leaning in on more podcast listening. And while we aren’t going to lose them on the radio overnight, making sure they know you have available podcasts of your local shows is critical.
In fact, this may be the most important time in the history of podcasts to let your listeners know they can find you on any podcast platform. A few years ago, the podcast concept was still likely foreign to many news/talk radio listeners. The data shows it no longer is, so it’s time to move on your digital strategy.
As the Edison Research shows, in the 25–54 demographic, AM/FM radio share of ear is 60%, while podcast listening is 25%. For 35–64, it’s 68% on AM/FM radio and 19% on podcasts. That percentage is only going to grow.
And while AM/FM continues to dominate in-car listening at an 84% share of ear, it’s our job, just like with an active social media presence, to be top of mind for our audiences wherever they are. If we can drive them to our content in the home, in the gym, and at the office via time-shifted listening options, we’re keeping the brand of our shows and stations at the forefront for our audience, not just being the thing they listen to when they’re driving to and from work or running errands.
In a media environment that is more crowded than ever before, we have to compete everywhere and anywhere we can. You’ll be amazed at how many people don’t realize your radio show is available on a podcast. In our bubble, it may seem obvious, but to many, podcasts and radio shows are different things. They’re not. We are all competing in the same places. Use your huge radio audience to promote this now as much as possible.
So as we close out the year and look ahead, embracing digital strategies and promoting podcast availability are no longer optional — they’re essential for staying connected with audiences across all age groups. By meeting listeners where they are and offering flexible, on-demand content, radio brands can maintain their relevance and continue to thrive in a shifting media environment. Good luck in 2026.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.