Home Blog Page 231

Barrett Media’s Top 20 National News/Talk Radio Shows of 2025

0

Barrett Media’s Top 20 of 2025 for News/Talk Radio is presented by JJ Surma Voiceovers. Be sure to check out JJ’s work and learn how he can elevate your brand by clicking here.

Our news/talk series starts with a look at the Top 20 National shows of 2025. To learn of future results, visit our website, newslettersXFacebookLinkedInTikTok, and Instagram. The full schedule of upcoming releases is listed down below the images. After the Top 20 series ends in March, I will record a video discussing the entire process. That video will be posted on the Barrett Media YouTube page. Be sure to subscribe so you’re notified once the video goes live.

As you review these results, please remember that they represent the collective feedback shared by our industry voters. Barrett Media does not vote in this process. Our role is to assemble the group, collect the votes, and present the information.

Important Information

#1 – These results are based on 2025’s performance. 2026 changes have no effect on the voting.

#2 – We ask our voters to supply photos and logos to avoid headaches. Some comply, but most don’t. It forces us to spend a lot of time digging for images to highlight everyone. For that reason, there are no photo changes unless it involves a mistake. Thanks in advance for understanding.

#3 – Our executive panel consists of forty (40) program directors and corporate executives from radio’s top broadcasting companies. They include Audacy, iHeart, Cumulus, Cox Media Group, Townsquare Media, Hubbard Radio, Bonneville, Radio One, Nexstar Media, Zimmer Communications, Connoisseur Media, Salem Radio Network, Premiere Networks, Fox News Radio, and a number of independently owned and operated outlets. Our voting group is large because we want feedback from all areas of the country. We also try to make sure the results don’t favor any one company.

#4 – The criteria for our voters included the ear test, originality, multi-platform impact, ratings success, clearance (national shows) and industry buzz. Keep in mind, our voters live in different cities, work for different companies, have different tastes, and value certain factors higher than others. This is not a perfect system but it’s one we feel good about using to showcase the industry’s best.

#5 – A total of 62 shows appeared on ballots submitted for voting consideration in the National News/Talk Radio Shows category.

And the Winner Is…

For the third straight year, our voters have chosen Clay & Buck as the Top National News/Talk Radio Show of 2025. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton finished ahead of Sean Hannity to earn the category win. Congrats to Clay, Buck, Julie Talbott and the entire Premiere Networks team on the well deserved recognition.

I want to thank Dylan Barrett for creating the artwork, and each voter who participated in the process. Now without further delay, here are Barrett Media’s Top 20 National News/Talk Radio Shows of 2025.

Additional Notes:

  • Clay & Buck held a twenty seven (27) point advantage over Sean Hannity to earn the category victory. Clay & Buck also received a category best seven (7) first place votes.
  • Spots 21-25 belonged to Armstrong & Getty, Michael SmerconishLarry Elder, Chris Stigall, and Gordon Deal.
  • The closest contest saw Erick Erickson, George Noory and Dana Loesch separated by two points each from each other for spots #9-#11.
  • Of the 62 shows to appear on submitted ballots, eleven (11) received at least one 1st place vote.

BM Top 20 of 2025 Remaining Schedule:

  • Wednesday February 11 = BM Top 20 Major/Mid Market N/T Radio Morning Shows of 2025
  • Thursday February 12 = BM Top 20 Major/Mid Market N/T Radio Midday Shows of 2025
  • Friday February 13 = BM Top 20 Major/Mid Market N/T Radio Afternoon Shows of 2025
  • Monday February 16 = BM Top 20 Major/Mid Market N/T Radio Program Directors of 2024
  • Tuesday February 17 = BM Top 20 Major/Mid Market N/T Radio Stations of 2025
  • Wednesday February 18 = BM Top 20 Major/Mid Market News Media Digital Shows of 2025

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

MLB Swung and Missed Again at a Golden Opportunity With Super Bowl Conclusion

0

As the Super Bowl concluded on Sunday night, the unofficial start of the Major League Baseball season was underway. The moment doesn’t carry the excitement of pitchers and catchers reporting or Opening Day, nor should it. Still, for baseball fans around the country, when the Vince Lombardi Trophy is raised, it signals that joyous time once again. Football goes dark, and baseball quietly waits in the wings.

What continues to baffle me is why baseball doesn’t treat this moment the same way a large portion of its fanbase does. For generations, the end of the NFL season has served as a mental handoff to spring. It’s when fans begin plans to check box scores from Florida and Arizona, debating rotation depth, and convincing themselves that this year will be different. Baseball owns that transition emotionally, yet the league continues to treat it like an afterthought.

Sure, a fun tweet or Instagram reel released late at night following the Super Bowl can tease the upcoming season. That effort is better than nothing. But for baseball fans, and sports fans in general, why does Major League Baseball continue to swing and miss when it comes to ramping up excitement for its own product? More importantly, why does the league consistently fail to meet its audience at moments that feel tailor-made for relevance?

Sunday night offered yet another case study in how MLB misses opportunities presented by the Super Bowl’s conclusion.

This week, spring training begins. The boys of summer head to their respective camps to prepare for a new season filled with optimism, roster battles, and renewed hope. This year, spring training arrives with an added layer of intrigue, as it intertwines with the World Baseball Classic. The tournament showcases the sport’s best players in international competition, offering a rare chance to market baseball as both global and modern. It should be a marketer’s dream.

Instead, baseball once again whispers when it should be shouting immediately following the Super Bowl.

The league’s struggle has always been how it advertises itself to a broader audience. Baseball leans heavily on nostalgia and attempts to win over the same fans year after year. Tradition matters, but it cannot be the only strategy.

It is hard to grow stars when the league refuses to think beyond its comfort zone. Other sports manufacture moments. Baseball waits for them to happen organically and then wonders why fewer people are paying attention.

That’s what made Sunday night so baffling.

MLB recently signed a three-year media rights agreement with NBC Sports, a move that should have represented a fresh start and a rare chance to reset perception. Beginning this season, Sunday Night Baseball moves from ESPN to NBC and Peacock. That alone is a significant shift. NBC is now home to the lone primetime baseball game on Opening Day, with the Los Angeles Dodgers raising another championship banner while facing the Arizona Diamondbacks.

It’s a premium window, backed by a network that understands event television.

Earlier in the day, NBC officially announced that Clayton Kershaw, Anthony Rizzo, and Joey Votto would be part of its MLB coverage this season. Those are recognizable names, respected veterans, and legitimate ambassadors for the sport. MLB broadcasts will begin on NBC Sports in less than two months, yet the Super Bowl broadcast passed without a single meaningful mention of baseball’s return.

Silence.

I understand that the Winter Olympics are currently underway, and NBA All Star weekend is next week. You want the cross-promotion naturally leans toward the winter games and next weekend. That makes sense. But nothing for your brand-new MLB media partner? Not even a simple tease? For MLB to not step in and purchase an ad immediately following the conclusion of the Super Bowl on NBC, in front of what was likely more than 100 million viewers, borders on negligence.

This wasn’t just a swing and a miss. It warrants a suspension for lack of hustle.

The landscape wasn’t entirely barren. NBC did air a cross-promotion featuring network talent and shows dodging baseballs inside 30 Rock, with Aaron Judge appearing. It was clever and well-produced. The problem was timing. That ad ran during the pregame, roughly an hour before kickoff. From that point forward, nearly five hours of programming passed without even a passing acknowledgment that baseball season was next on NBC Sports.

That’s five hours of missed reminders. Five hours of missed impressions. Five hours where the sport could have reintroduced itself to casual fans who might only tune in a few times a year.

MLB will never draw the audience the Super Bowl attracts annually. That expectation is unrealistic. Still, with a new partnership with NBCUniversal, one would reasonably assume the league would receive more than a single 30-second pregame ad. Apparently, that assumption was misguided.

It also raises a broader question about strategy. How many baseball fans are realistically tuning into figure skating or bobsledding in hopes of catching a Sunday Night Baseball cross-promotional message that resonates? Cross-promotion only works when the audiences overlap, or when the message is strong enough to cut through. Baseball needs intentional placement, not accidental exposure.

The upcoming Major League Baseball season already faces enough challenges without self-inflicted wounds. Nine teams will introduce new distribution models for local broadcasts due to the fallout involving Main Street Sports Group. That shift creates confusion and potential added costs for fans, testing loyalty in markets that can least afford it.

Labor concerns also linger. Trust in the game remains fragile, with multiple players suspended for conspiring with gamblers. Competitive imbalance continues to widen, as wealthier teams stockpile elite talent while others struggle to keep pace. Even the World Baseball Classic faces uncertainty, with insurance complications leading some countries to reconsider participation altogether.

Against that backdrop, baseball needs good press, smart marketing, and a locked-in audience. The Super Bowl provided exactly that opportunity. Instead, MLB once again struck out looking.

Baseball doesn’t need the Super Bowl to survive. The sport will endure, as it always has. But it desperately needs moments like this to matter. When the biggest stage in American sports goes dark, the next act should already be stepping into the spotlight, not waiting for permission.

Instead, MLB once again chose silence over ambition and nostalgia over urgency. The season will arrive whether the league promotes it or not. Games will be played. Pennant races will unfold. October drama will come.

The real question is whether anyone beyond the already converted will notice.

Opportunities like Sunday night don’t come with a second at-bat. Baseball can’t keep fouling them off forever.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

What the NFL Should Consider Heading Into Next Year’s Super Bowl Halftime Show

0

The NFL’s Super Bowl halftime show is not a political statement? How did we get here? The road to brand building is littered with celebrities and corporations who misjudge their target, thinking they have enough political oxygen to bend minds in their favor.

Last August, we wrote about a litany of business blunders that stalled or derailed big business. In the fall, a column warning music brands to stay in their lane to meet expectations contained examples of celebrity missteps that fumbled careers.

To understand the importance of a Super Bowl halftime show and what it means to the NFL brand, let’s take a look in the rearview mirror.

The Super Bowl halftime show has become more than just a simple intermission pause. It is now one of the most anticipated cultural events of the year. It attracts global attention and starts conversations. What once featured marching bands and local performers now showcases world-renowned artists. The performances draw staggering audiences, occasionally eclipsing even the game itself while defining careers.

Michael Jackson’s 1993 performance became the benchmark. The halftime show cemented itself as a powerful platform where entertainment and cultural dialogue clash on a world stage. Super Bowl halftime shows long ago typically featured marching bands, collections of oldies performers, and variety-themed concerts that oozed sunshine pop and musical mayonnaise. They were far from creating a political stir.

Let’s take a brief historical trip to demonstrate just how big this moment has become.

In 1980, Up With People provided the anthem as a salute to the Big Band Era. The Pittsburgh Steelers defeated the Los Angeles Rams by a dozen points in Pasadena. The halftime performance toasted the Big Band era with swing-era jazz and popular tunes of the 1940s. A large ensemble group called Up With People performed, simply singing and dancing with zero fireworks.

1987 featured a salute to Hollywood’s 100th anniversary. The New York Giants defeated the Denver Broncos by almost three touchdowns, while the halftime show proved forgettable. Produced by Disney, the USC and Grambling State marching bands took to the field playing TV theme songs like the western Bonanza while accompanying Hollywood legends George Burns and Mickey Rooney.

Then came 1993 and the King of Pop, Michael Jackson. On the field, the Dallas Cowboys slammed the Buffalo Bills by 35 points, while the halftime show made history. Widely credited with transforming halftime into a must-see concert event, it marked the first time a Super Bowl halftime show drew a larger audience than the first half of the game. Michael Jackson made a dramatic entrance with a medley of his hits, capped by “We Are The World” alongside 3,000 members of Los Angeles-based children’s choirs.

U2 captured the attention of the world following September 11 in New Orleans. The New England Patriots beat the St. Louis Rams on a last-second field goal by future Hall of Famer Adam Vinatieri, launching the Patriots’ run of six Super Bowl victories. With U2 on the field at halftime, the show became one of the most emotionally resonant in Super Bowl history. Celebrating the United States and saluting the victims of 9/11, the BBC, Variety, and Billboard all rank it among the greatest halftime shows ever.

The NFL would later settle into a succession of classic rock and classic hits, safe and on-target favorites, in the following years.

Do you recall No Doubt, Shania Twain, and Sting? How about Janet Jackson’s wardrobe malfunction?

Paul McCartney, The Rolling Stones, and Prince all took the stage at the biggest game of the year. Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers and Bruce Springsteen with his E Street Band entertained the globe.

Last year’s Kendrick Lamar show was the most-watched halftime show in history, a monumental feat considering his lack of mainstream radio play and limited household recognition. Within the musical environment of the NFL, he was hardly a top-of-mind choice.

Which brings us to Sunday’s performance. Bad Bunny is no stranger to Super Bowl halftime hype, having appeared in Jennifer Lopez’s 2020 halftime show alongside Shakira.

Plenty of Super Bowl milestones were set Sunday, including the first Spanish-language performer to headline. Supporters point out that he has sold more than 100 million records worldwide, which is true. However, fewer than five million of those have been sold in the United States.

The unnecessary backlash included a group of American artists staging their own All-American Turning Point USA event, led by Kid Rock and supported by a handful of country artists. The insinuation was that Bad Bunny is not American, despite the fact that he is Puerto Rican and American. That show aired across various social media platforms including The Daily Wire and YouTube.

When the ratings arrive for this year’s Super Bowl, does it matter if fewer viewers stayed for the halftime show? No. The National Football League is a $20 billion annual revenue generator with more than enough brand oxygen to survive what might be perceived as a fumble in halftime selection.

Still, the question remains. Why leave your lane? International appeal? Certainly. Pushback from core fans? Also certain. People love the familiar. The proof lies in the Super Bowl marketing pudding.

During the game, commercials leaned heavily on universally recognized hits to promote products. Those song snippets included everything from Bon Jovi to Queen and House of Pain. When you are paying $9 million for a 30-second Super Bowl spot, you had better attach your brand to a familiar aural activator.

Not Bad Bunny.

As for the Bad Bunny Super Bowl halftime show, the visuals were entertaining, and the set list featured international hits including Titi Me Pregunto, Yo Perreo Sola, EoO, and NUEVAYol.

The performance also included assists from Lady Gaga, Liam Ramos, and Ricky Martin. Was it a great halftime show? Perhaps. Did it belong in the Super Bowl? You decide.

Social media lit up with polarizing reactions, as expected. Truthfinder declared, “It sucked – give us Zach Bryan,” while RaginCajin countered, “He killed it. Great halftime show.” Thousands of other opinions followed.

The flip side of what the NFL attempted is simple. Play to your core. Enhance the brand, not disrupt it. Next year, NFL executives would be well served by walking the tailgate acreage of Lucas Oil Stadium, Soldier Field, or Levi’s Stadium. Listen to what pours out of speakers before kickoff.

You will hear The Rolling Stones, Bruce Springsteen, and Tom Petty. Add AC/DC, Bruno Mars, and Bon Jovi. Throw in The Zac Brown Band, Jason Aldean, and Thomas Rhett, all of whom have sold millions more records in America than Bad Bunny.

Dear NFL — The Eagles.

Before they retire.

That’s the halftime show at SoFi Stadium next February.

You’re welcome.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

The Industry According To…Rob Goldklang, Warner Records

Thank you for checking out ‘The Industry According To’. This series runs each Tuesday, and features radio and record industry executives, managers, programmers, talent, artists, and professionals from all areas of the business world. To be considered as a future guest, email me at keithblackboxgroup@gmail.com.

Today we hear from Rob Goldklang, SVP of Promotion at Warner Records. Rob has been a vital part of some of the biggest projects from the past few decades, so he’s no stranger to moving targets and the dynamics of breaking an artist in today’s industry. 

So, let’s dive in. 

The Promotion Machine

Keith: You’ve survived and seen the industry pivot in several ways from consolidating large promo staffs down to only a few, to mailing out CD singles to now just directing people to links for download — but how has radio promotion changed in the past 10-15 years?

Rob: At its core, radio promotion hasn’t really changed. It still starts with passion—for an artist, for a song—and the belief that it deserves to be heard. Our job has always been to champion that music, to stay with it, and to help break songs and careers. What has changed is how we get there. I’ve always believed in embracing evolution, constantly learning, and not getting stuck in how things used to be done. Being part of a song’s success—especially when it truly connects with a wide audience—is something that continues to motivate me, no matter how the tools shift.

Fewer Gatekeepers, Tougher Locks

Keith: There were days when PDs made most of their own music decisions and some still do, but you’ve heard PDs say, “I love the song, but I can’t add it right now.” That translates to needing corporate approval to put in a record — how do you handle that?

Rob: I actually think that idea is a bit of a misconception. The majority of the people I work with either have the ability to add a record or have significant influence in the process. Yes, within larger chains there can be format captains or centralized voices, but in most cases PDs are empowered and trusted to make decisions. The relationship and the conversation still matter—and that’s where real progress happens. Everything we do is building and telling a story. Luckily on Tuesdays, we get to hit reset every week!

Streaming vs. Strategy

Keith: How often do streaming numbers change your promotion plans versus sticking with what you believe you have? 

Rob: Streaming doesn’t necessarily change the plan, but it absolutely helps inform it. We’ve seen plenty of cases where a strong streaming story opens doors at radio. It becomes another way to tell the artist’s story and build momentum. The truth is, we simply have more tools now—more data, more insight—and when used thoughtfully, they help us make smarter, more informed decisions.

Where Does Radio Fit

Keith: For a new artist, Radio used to reign as the top priority in gaining exposure, but where does radio fit today in the overall priority list of bringing newer artists to the forefront. 

Rob: I actually feel radio is in a very good place.  I see real collaboration across different areas at Warner. Even if radio isn’t always viewed as the #1 starter it still matters—locally, culturally, and deeply to artists and managers. Alongside other tools, radio remains an incredibly powerful force. 30+ years into my career at Warner, I can honestly say radio still truly matters.

Majors/Independents/Neither

Keith: Realistic scenario: hot new rock band, unsigned, does a showcase and all the majors and independents want to sign now but the artist knows they could also rely on other platforms to do a lot of the lifting. Why should the artist choose Warner Records?

Rob: I’ve always thought of Warner as a boutique major label. Aaron Bay-Schuck and Tom Corson have built a diverse roster and a real focus on artist development, with personalized attention at every stage. We work with stadium-level acts and baby bands, across multiple genres. Recently, I was part of an artist meeting with a band that had already built momentum but was ready for the next level. What Warner brings is a deeply experienced team across streaming, sync, A&R, physical, publicity, marketing—and radio. Having spent my career here doing radio and currently my dept under the leadership of GM Mike Chester, I’m proud of the role I’ve played in some of the most important moments in music culture, and that experience still carries weight.

Is “Regional” Still A Thing

Keith: There used to be a few radio brands that led the way in breaking new music — do you still see similar patterns regionally or nationally or has that influence been flattened by streaming? 

Rob: One hundred percent. Local scenes are thriving in so many markets. We’ve had numerous plans that focused on breaking records regionally, and those grassroots successes often become the foundation for something much bigger.

Charts

Keith: Airplay, Spotify, iTunes — there are charts galore, but when you’re working a key project, which chart is the most important in telling you that you have a real winner on your hands? 

Rob: Chart success is still an important part of my role, especially at Mediabase and Billboard. At the same time, I’m constantly watching Spotify, Apple Music, Pandora, SiriusXM—playlists, new music shows, and discovery moments. I don’t think there’s one definitive winner. Every chart and platform serves a purpose, and together they help paint the full picture.

Careers or Moments

Keith: Looking at it through a “promotion” lens, is your job more about building careers or creating moments in a chaotic space?

Rob: For me, it’s always been about building careers. Taking an artist like sombr, starting with “Back to Friends” going number one at Alternative, and then watching that success be a part of opening doors to multiple songs and new opportunities—that’s the goal. I remember the early days of Linkin Park, Muse, and The Black Keys, as well as career resurgences with Green Day, RHCP, and the Deftones. Every artist tells a different story, and every path looks different—but longevity is always the focus.

One Change

Keith: You can change one structural or procedural thing about how artist promotion works in the music and radio industry — what do you change? 

Rob: I’d say: don’t be afraid of new music. It’s so important that we’re actively building the superstars of tomorrow. Somewhere out there is someone strumming a guitar who’s going to change the world, and we need to make sure we’re doing everything we can to help bring that voice forward.

What’s Harder

Keith: What’s more difficult today, breaking a new artist or keeping an older one relevant once the algorithm decides its bored? 

Rob: That’s a great question. Established artists face the challenge of sustained relevance in a fast-moving world, while new artists face the fundamental hurdle of discovery—and the pressure to build both a sound and a brand. They’re very different challenges, which makes it hard to say one is definitively harder than the other.

Your Best Story

Keith: You’ve worked with some of the biggest artists of all-time. What’s the one story you love to tell that we should hear? It can be a success, flop, pure mayhem, etc..

Rob: There’s been plenty of pure mayhem over the years. I think that one might have to wait for the book someday.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Inside Spike Eskin’s Evolution From Programmer To Host Guiding 94 WIP Afternoons

0

It’s been nearly two years since Spike Eskin re-entered the doors of 94 WIP in Philadelphia, a place he called home for nearly ten years before departing to program WFAN in New York City, along with overseeing CBS Sports Radio. When he returned to take over the afternoon drive timeslot with Ike Reese, Eskin was no longer the manager he once was.

Instead, he was embarking on a new challenge: fortifying himself as a full-time sports talk radio host for the first time.

“Being a program director made me a better host,” Eskin explained. “I don’t ever get the itch to be a program director ever again. I’ve been around long enough to know it’s impossible to predict the future. This job I have now provides me enough of what I loved about being a program director, but it’s also more fun.”

It wasn’t that long ago that Eskin was tasked with managing one of the most iconic radio brands in the country, complete with a roster full of successful talent. During his time as program director at WIP, he hired and elevated a majority of the on-air lineup that remains in place today.

Working for Your Successor

Eskin said he felt welcomed upon his return to the station and appreciated the opportunity to work under his successor, Rod Lakin. He credited Lakin with reinforcing the culture Eskin helped build during his previous tenure at WIP, especially at a time when many organizations can struggle following key departures.

“A lot of sports radio stations can be shark tanks. We’re not competitors, but we sort of are. It’s easy for a sports radio station to not be a fun place to go to,” noted Eskin.

While both men have served in the same role, they maintain very different approaches to management. Eskin admitted he tended to be louder, more aggressive, and more emotional during his time as WIP’s programming head. In contrast, he described Lakin as someone who leads with a consistently even tone.

“It was good that the person that followed me was not some other version of me. It would have been more difficult for that person, because they would have been compared directly to me,” says Eskin. “My aggressiveness and emotions benefited and hurt me in some ways. I find it much easier for me to work for Rod [Lakin] than work for me.”

Content Criticisms

94 WIP has long been the market’s top sports talk station, attracting large audiences and significant revenue. It also serves as the radio flagship of the Philadelphia Eagles. Eskin notes the Eagles are the market’s most popular team for several reasons.

In recent years, the content approach across much of WIP’s lineup has drawn outside criticism. Its direct format competitor, 97.5 The Fanatic, even launched a campaign last summer encouraging Philadelphia sports fans to “make the switch.” That effort followed criticism from several WIP hosts toward Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts, which some Fanatic hosts labeled cheap engagement.

For Eskin, however, he said he pays no attention to the noise from rival stations or any outside criticism regarding content philosophy.

“When you say competition, I know you’re going to think I’m lying. But I don’t even know who you’re talking about,” said Eskin. “I don’t pay attention to anything locally aside from our show and the people we talk about on our show.”

His reasoning stems from the belief that listening to other shows could influence how he approaches hosting his own program alongside co-host Ike Reese and lead producer Jack Fritz.

“We don’t tell people what to care about. Instead, we have to find out what people care about and talk about it,” explains Eskin. “We are reflective, and not directive… The way to look at it is at a base level, the Eagles are just by far the biggest deal. That’s just the base, and not the day-to-day.”

Just as Eskin noted that being a program director made him a better host, he believes the opposite is also true. He said his experience hosting in both talk and music radio helped him navigate the responsibilities of a program director. While programming at both WIP and WFAN, Eskin was constantly thinking about how to best support talent, recognizing that different personalities required different forms of direction.

Lessons From New York City

Recently, former WFAN host Brandon Tierney revealed that he experienced some difficulty with guidance during his time working with Eskin. Tierney said he struggled to understand Eskin’s mandate that hosts deliver a statement or hook within the first 10–15 seconds of each program. He believed the directive disrupted the natural flow of the show.

After the comments made headlines across sports media circles, Eskin said he felt honored that his coaching style became a national talking point.

“I’m honored that my name is ‘click-baity’ enough to take an off-hand comment from BT [Tierney],” joked Eskin. “Every host is different, and their needs are a little different. Their [BT & Sal] were following the most popular show on the station, and they didn’t take a commercial break before their show began… Brandon has a habit, and he would acknowledge this, of not getting to the point. I just wanted Brandon and Sal to capitalize on the audience they had.”

During his time programming WFAN, Eskin also oversaw CBS Sports Radio. Following the network’s merger with the BetMGM Network to form Westwood One Sports, Eskin reflected on both the experience and its unique challenges.

“I really enjoyed the few years that I got to work with the staff at CBS Sports Radio. It’s a much different job than being a local sports radio host. Being a local sports radio host, you get a lot more direct feedback and figure out what your north star is. With national, I felt it was much more difficult, and they all handled it extremely well,” noted Eskin.

He credited the staff’s creativity and energy. It was his first chance to work on a national product adding that he considers himself fortunate to have had the experience.

“I would like to hope that all those folks would say that they are better for having worked with me, because I am certainly better for having worked with them,” said Eskin.

Legacy

Looking ahead, Eskin said he is excited about what 2026 and beyond may bring for both himself and the team at 94 WIP. After nearly three decades in media, he has built a footprint across nearly every corner of the industry.

From transitioning out of music radio into sports talk, Eskin has programmed two of America’s most respected sports radio brands. He also hosted a successful podcast for 13 years. Now, he is enjoying the evolution into a lead on-air role. While many chapters have already been written, Eskin believes his story is far from finished.

“I feel very blessed that my career is going on nearly thirty years and I’ve been lucky to have some very good jobs,” said Eskin. “My talent story is not fully written yet… There’s a lot more to write.”

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Why News/Talk Radio Hosts and PDs Can’t Afford to Ignore How Listeners Actually Live

0

I try not to sugarcoat my articles with fairy dust and unicorns. To maximize revenue, ratings, and relevance, news/talk radio must lean into the habits of listeners.

I am talking about life here, and we are just a small share of the entertainment pie. We must know our strengths and weaknesses.

People are inherently selfish and have very little patience. P2 and P3 listeners turn on news talk radio for a very specific reason. They want to know what is going on. If there is a monster news story and it is not being discussed, the listener will lose trust that you are on it. I understand that you prepped for a three-hour show and may have a guest on another subject booked. PPM data says the average listener is with you about 14 minutes per listening occasion. Diary markets are longer, but always remember that listening is based on recall.

Years ago, I spent the day at Arbitron’s office in Columbia, Maryland, going through the diaries for the market I was programming at the time. It was a frightening and humbling experience. One diary commented that they loved my station. It was the listener’s go-to radio destination. This individual listened for zero hours, zero minutes for the week. It was a huge lesson in branding for me.

What are your listeners’ habits? News/Talk radio is no longer their only choice for entertainment while in the car. The phone, podcasts, and personal playlists are a few of the distractions. Your listeners are dropping off kids at school. They are picking up milk, visiting the dry cleaners, hitting the dispensary, and running kids to activities.

I counted it last week. Most days, I made two to three stops on the way to work and on the way home each time. What does this mean for you? You need to be on your game. What is your listener expecting? I am not talking about the text line people who are sitting in a dark room, focused on your show. We all fantasize that our audience is totally glued into every moment on the radio. I wish that was true. It isn’t. Let’s talk about reality. Your listeners have busy lives.

Let us lean into our listeners’ lives. Your market may have a big road construction project. This leads to opportunities for longer time spent listening per occasion. This can be a huge win. How often do you mention the traffic mess on your show? If your listeners are frustrated over traffic, you are connecting to them.

I am a data guy, but I also have hunches that I follow. These hunches are derived from experiences over the years. I have had successes, failures, and ideas that did not move the needle either. But the data is key. Census, Nielsen, and whatever research you can collect matter. If your morning host gets totally sidetracked by a text or email and 90 percent of your listeners are driving, this is an opportunity to focus on the right things.

We must always be concerned about growing our platforms. You have the radio signal, audio stream, video stream, podcasts, station database, social media, and more. If we are not meeting expectations, there are plenty of choices. Evaluate your life. Think about your distractions.

This is about our P2 and P3 news/talk radio listeners. Have you noticed that community groups seem to be disappearing? I have been invited to speak to these groups. The members are older and insular. We are a tribal people. We surround ourselves with individuals who are like us. This could be through ethnicity, faith, interests, or community groups. If you are not adding new members to the tribe, you are shrinking. Focusing only on the people who are with you is a losing proposition. People move, change their routines, die, or become Luddites.

Your understanding of what is going on in your community is key as well. I am not referring to city council meetings, which have very limited interest. What is the new restaurant everyone is talking about? Is there a big event this weekend? What is the toughest ticket to get? On this Valentine’s Day, the wife says she doesn’t want anything. By the way, that is a trap. Of course, she wants to be thought of and cherished. You must do the flowers, wine, and dinner thing. Dinner can be made at home. Relationships are, or should be, an integral part of the lives of your listeners.

We need to know our role. We also need to always think about addition and what is really going on in the lives of our fans. Andwe have heard about super-serving our P1 listeners. There is some truth to that, but it can create fewer people at your party. I like to focus squarely on the station’s target demographic.

Program directors, when is the last time you got together with your staff to develop a listener profile? If it has been a few years, this is a great way to build a plan to relate to your listeners. Market segmentation is a challenge.

Creating focus and a mandate as a team can help revitalize your station. It also creates a playbook led by you and developed by your team for unity of mission.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

3 Reasons Why MS NOW’S Podcast Play is a Genius Move

1

Here’s the reality facing cable news in 2026: the old playbook isn’t working like it used to. MS NOW understands that, and its expanding podcast strategy featuring Symone Sanders Townsend and Eugene Daniels isn’t some shiny distraction.

It’s a practical, forward-looking move rooted in how people actually consume news now, and perhaps even more so in the future.

Instead of pretending linear television will magically rebound, and cable TV will be the thriving juggernaut that it was in the 80s, 90s, and 00s, the network is making a smart bet on platforms that reward personality, consistency, and audience connection.

I believe there are three reasons why this move makes a ton of sense for MS NOW, currently and down the line, and why it signals that the network is building around Eugene Daniels and Symone Sanders Townsend.

Meeting the Audience Where They Are

Virtually everyone outside of Fox News is watching their cable viewership totals slide. The trend isn’t subtle, and it isn’t temporary. Audiences are aging, habits are shifting, and appointment viewing keeps losing ground to on-demand options.

MS NOW isn’t going to wither on the vine and quietly accept irrelevance. Doing nothing would be the real risk. By putting more resources into podcasting, the network is making a concerted effort to meet news consumers where they already are.

Podcasts fit modern life better than cable ever could. People listen while driving, working out, or doom-scrolling with earbuds in. That flexibility matters, especially to younger listeners who don’t build schedules around TV grids.

There’s also a tone advantage. Podcasts allow for longer conversations and more personality. Hosts can explain, react, and occasionally breathe without racing to a commercial break. That format plays to the strengths of people like Sanders Townsend and Daniels, who thrive when they’re allowed to sound human.

Cable news still has value, but it’s no longer the only table in town. MS NOW is acknowledging that reality instead of fighting it. That alone puts the network ahead of competitors still clinging to past formulas.

Introducing Yourself to New Audiences

There’s a strong likelihood that many podcast listeners are unfamiliar with the MS NOW brand. Honestly, almost everyone is unfamiliar with the MS NOW brand. Some may guess it used to be MSNBC, but many won’t care enough to dig deeper.

That’s actually the point.

The brand refresh creates a clean entry point. New listeners can engage without decades of baggage or assumptions about what the network represents. Preconceived notions are powerful, and not always helpful.

By stepping into podcasting under a refreshed name, MS NOW gives itself room to experiment. It can branch into new areas without dragging old perceptions along for the ride. That flexibility is invaluable when courting audiences who didn’t grow up watching cable news.

For younger listeners, the name matters less than the voices. If the hosts feel credible and relatable, the brand earns trust over time. Podcasts allow that relationship to develop naturally, episode by episode.

In that sense, podcasting isn’t just distribution. It’s brand introduction and brand rehab rolled into one. MS NOW gets to define itself instead of defending itself.

Creating a Proving Ground

This is where the strategy really shines.

Podcast expansion creates a proving ground for emerging talent. Eugene Daniels is still growing into his role at MS NOW, and many audiences are just getting to know him. Symone Sanders Townsend is more established, but she’s also someone worth building around for the future.

The current primetime lineup is, in some respects, old. If I were a realtor, I’d say “experienced” or “veteran” instead of saying the quiet part out loud. Lawrence O’Donnell is 74. It’s fair to ask how much longer he wants to anchor a primetime cable show.

Rachel Maddow and Stephanie Ruhle are in their 50s. That’s not ancient, but it’s still worth noting. Time moves quickly in television, especially when audience demographics are shifting underneath you.

Sanders Townsend and Daniels are both 36. That matters. If MS NOW wants to reach millennial and Gen Z audiences, it’s probably not doing that by defaulting to older, more familiar options.

Podcasts allow them to build audiences without the pressure of nightly ratings. They can refine their voices, develop chemistry, and learn what resonates. That growth translates back to cable, not away from it.

Creating crossover between podcast audiences and TV viewers strengthens the entire ecosystem. It also future-proofs the network. In the long run, that kind of bench-building isn’t optional. It’s survival.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Detroit Tigers, Red Wings Announce Broadcast Partnership With MLB

0

Ilitch Sports + Entertainment has struck a landmark media agreement with Major League Baseball that reshapes how local broadcasts will be produced and distributed for two of Detroit’s most prominent franchises, offering long-term clarity amid ongoing instability across the regional sports network landscape.

Beginning with the 2026 season, Detroit Tigers games will be produced and distributed directly by Major League Baseball, marking the first time the league has entered into a comprehensive, team-specific partnership of this scope with a club ownership group. The arrangement expands further in 2026-27, when the Detroit Red Wings transition into the same ecosystem, with Ilitch Sports + Entertainment overseeing production while MLB supports backend processes.

The partnership creates a centralized platform for fans across Michigan and the teams’ broader home television territories. It allows access to games and related content through both traditional broadcasts and direct-to-consumer options.

While details regarding cable, satellite, and streaming distribution have not been finalized, the company emphasized continuity. Fans should expect viewing options to remain consistent with current methods. Additional details will be announced at a later date.

Ilitch Sports + Entertainment President and CEO Ryan Gustafson described the move as a proactive response to growing uncertainty. He pointed to ongoing financial disruptions within the regional sports broadcasting model. Gustafson also cited continued rights instability across multiple markets.

“We have two of the top-rated broadcasts in our respective sports and remain focused on listening to fans about what matters most to them. What we’ve heard includes making sure our games are available throughout the market, providing a reliable streaming product, and producing a broadcast that’s informative and entertaining in all the right ways,” said Gustafson. “This is a great path forward in those areas, allowing us to provide a great experience for fans throughout our local market.”

Outside of nationally selected telecasts, Tigers and Red Wings games will remain available throughout the local market. Fans can access games through cable or satellite packages. Streaming subscriptions will also offer access, ensuring broad reach across platform preferences.

Under the Tigers portion of the agreement, MLB will handle full broadcast production and distribution responsibilities. That includes negotiating carriage agreements and operating a direct-to-consumer streaming service. Detroit’s established on-air team is expected to return for the 2026 season. The group is led by Jason Benetti and Dan Dickerson on play-by-play. Analysts Andy Dirks and Dan Petry are also expected back.

The transition follows a surge in viewership during the Tigers’ 2025 campaign. Per-game streamers increased by 121 percent. Per-game household impressions jumped 101 percent. Only five U.S.-based teams surpassed Detroit in average per-game viewership last season. Just two teams posted a higher overall rating.

The Red Wings will complete the shift following the 2025-26 NHL season. Coverage on FanDuel Sports Network is expected to continue through the end of the current agreement, with additional details regarding future distribution to be announced closer to the 2026-27 season.

Longtime broadcast voices Ken Daniels and Mickey Redmond are expected to remain central figures in Red Wings telecasts moving forward.

Taken together, the agreement positions Ilitch Sports + Entertainment and MLB at the forefront of a shifting local media model, one designed to stabilize team broadcasts while adapting to how fans increasingly choose to watch.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Newsmax’s Rob Schmitt Scores Interview with New Venezuelan Government Leadership

0

Newsmax host Rob Schmitt has secured an interview with Jorge Rodriguez, one of the new leaders of the Venezuelan government.

On Rob Schmitt Tonight at 7 PM ET on Monday evening, Schmitt will host an interview with Rodriguez, who has served as the President of the National Assembly since 2021.

Rodriguez previously served as the Minister of Communication and Information under Maduro until departing in 2020 to run for the nation’s parliament later that year.

His sister, Delcy Rodriguez, has been serving as the President of Venezuela since the capture and arrest of Nicolas Maduro in January.

In a post on X, Schmitt called the interview opportunity “a huge get for Newsmax.”

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Michael Kay: I Would Have Fired Tony Dungy for Not Discussing Hall of Fame Vote on NBC Sports

0

Michael Kay did not mince words when reacting to NBC Sports analyst Tony Dungy declining to discuss his Pro Football Hall of Fame vote during Super Bowl coverage on NBC Sports. Kay reflected on the moment as one that sparked fresh debate about transparency, media responsibility, and accountability among high-profile analysts.

During Monday’s Michael Kay Show on ESPN New York, Kay expressed disbelief that Dungy, who serves as both a Hall of Fame voter and a paid television analyst, would refuse to address a decision tied directly to one of the most polarizing storylines in football. That storyline centered on Bill Belichick not being elected as a first-ballot Hall of Famer.

“Tony Dungy, again, who’s getting paid by NBC, was asked on the never-ending pregame show whether or not he voted for Bill Belichick,” Kay said. “He said he’s not going to discuss it. First of all, if I’m NBC, I fire him on the spot. We’re paying you whatever amount of money we’re paying you. You are discussing it.”

Kay framed the issue less as a personal disagreement and more as a professional contradiction. From his perspective, Dungy’s refusal undermined the very purpose of his role on a national broadcast. Kay questioned the value proposition for networks when analysts decline to engage on consequential topics.

In his view, refusing to speak does not protect credibility. Instead, it erodes trust with the audience, particularly when the subject involves a historic decision.

The frustration did not stop there. Kay also challenged what he perceived as a disconnect between Dungy’s long-standing public image and his silence in this moment. While acknowledging Dungy’s reputation as a respected figure in football circles, Kay suggested that avoiding scrutiny only intensified the backlash.

“I don’t get Tony Dungy’s game,” Kay said. “Supposedly a good guy, God-fearing man. You do something that is a big part of history. You keep the greatest coach of all time from being a first-ballot Hall of Famer, and you don’t have the guts to discuss it?”

Kay added that declining to explain the vote made the situation worse rather than defusing it. He argued that transparency, even when uncomfortable, often strengthens credibility. Silence, however, invites speculation and criticism.

Dungy, who works as an analyst for NBC Sports, has not publicly expanded on his decision beyond declining to comment on air. The Hall of Fame voting process allows voters to keep ballots private, a rule that many media members have cited in defense of Dungy’s stance.

“It just doesn’t make sense to me,” said Kay. “Really bad for a guy who has pretty much a pristine reputation does not come out looking good with this.”

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.