Home Blog Page 76

Larry O’Connor Defends Salem Media After Time Magazine Report

0

Larry O’Connor pushed back against a Time report about Salem Media. He rejected claims that Salem personalities received messaging directives.

What We Know: Larry O’Connor defended Salem Media after a Time report examined the company’s relationship with Chief Strategy Officer Brad Parscale. The article alleged Parscale has worked as a foreign agent for the Israeli government while helping shape Salem’s business strategy. Time also questioned whether Parscale influenced editorial coverage supporting Israel across Salem platforms. O’Connor responded publicly by denying any editorial direction from company leadership. He argued Salem hosts have backed Israel for decades. He also said that support long predates Parscale’s arrival at the company. His comments came as debate continues over media independence, political advocacy, and the influence of executives behind major conservative media brands.

What They Said: “I work for Salem and I have never been told to say anything at all at any time. Furthermore, I supported Vance and Trump throughout the negotiations giving them the benefit of the doubt at every turn. Finally, I and the rest of the Salem lineup have supported Israel for decades, well before Mr. Parscale had any affiliation with the company. We have years of shows, podcasts and columns to prove it. The really disconcerting foreign influence may lie with those podcasters and hosts who supported Israel for those same decades and then suddenly turned on a dime and changed their positions. Perhaps that deserves a little more scrutiny.” -Larry O’Connor

What Remains Unclear: If Salem Media will publicly address the assertion that Parscale is working as a foreign agent.

What It Means: O’Connor’s response underscores how conservative media companies continue facing scrutiny over editorial independence. His defense also highlights Salem’s position that its programming reflects longstanding views rather than executive direction. The dispute could draw additional attention to how media organizations separate corporate leadership from on-air editorial judgment as the controversy develops.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

WFAN’s Gregg Giannotti Doesn’t “Believe” Sports Viewership Figures Anymore

0

Gregg Giannotti has stopped believing the numbers. The WFAN host says networks and streamers are both spinning the story on viewership, where none of the figures make any sense.

What We Know: Giannotti made the comments Friday on WFAN’s Boomer and Gio. Netflix’s MLB Home Run Derby drew 5.3 million viewers, its lowest total since 2003 and down from 5.73 million on ESPN a year earlier. FOX’s MLB All-Star Game, by contrast, averaged 8.79 million viewers, its largest audience since 2018. Giannotti pointed to that gap as proof the industry can’t be trusted.

What They Said: (All quotes via Boomer & Gio on WFAN)

WFAN’s Gregg Giannotti doesn’t believe current viewership figures by networks for sports: “I don’t believe any numbers that come out of sporting events anymore. If you catch me using the ratings argument for the popularity of a sport, stop me. I am saying right now I don’t believe any of it.”

WFAN’s Gregg Giannotti doesn’t understand how FOX Sports did so well with the MLB All Star Game: “You all had an All Star game that had the two biggest stars in Othani and Judge not there and being a part of it. The game was a complete dud. It almost feels to me there is this push from the networks that have been losing to the streaming services. The number, they’re just pumping out false stuff to make it seem like they’re winning over the streaming services.”

WFAN’s Gregg Giannotti on the differences in how Netflix and FOX Sports judge viewership success: “Netflix, I don’t even think they care what that number was for the Home Run Derby. They’re based on subscriptions. Like that [ratings] doesn’t really matter. If they pick up a number of subscriptions, they just want live sporting events. But I don’t believe any of it anymore. I really don’t.”

What Remains Unclear: Giannotti didn’t specify whether he doubts Nielsen’s methodology or the networks’ spin. He also didn’t name other past figures he considers inflated. Meanwhile, neither FOX Sports nor Netflix has responded publicly. So the dispute stays one-sided for now.

What It Means: Giannotti’s skepticism reflects a wider gap between linear and streaming metrics. Networks chase ratings wins, while Netflix leans on subscriptions instead. Consequently, fans and advertisers lack one consistent yardstick. Until that changes, on-air doubt like his will likely keep spreading.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Netflix Avoids Listing Podcast Viewership In 2026 Mid-Year Reporting

0

Netflix released its final biannual viewership report Thursday. However, the report came with several changes and omissions. The company confirmed a shift to annual reporting starting in 2027, but also neglected to list podcast viewership as a specific category in the reporting.

What We Know: War Machine topped Netflix’s film chart for the first half of 2026, while His & Hers led scripted series. Video podcasts, meanwhile, landed under the vague “Other Shows” label, logging 757 million hours in total. The “Other Shows” label carries other programming outside of podcasts. Netflix entered video podcasting earlier this year but still won’t break out individual title’s viewership. Netflix now carries more than 50 podcasts on its platform. The twice-yearly report cadence had run since December 2023.

What They Said: Netflix (via shareholder letter per The Wrap): “Recently launched video podcasts over-index on viewing during the day and on mobile devices, an indicator that this engagement is incremental.”

What Remains Unclear: Any true viewership data from Netflix or any of the over 50 podcasts on the platform is unknown. Any timetable for any data release is also unknown.

What It Means: It’s obvious that Netflix wants to allow some time before releasing any viewership data regarding their podcast success story. However, by not releasing any specific data, could the viewership be less than what the platform expected. By no means does the amount Netflix is investing in podcasts affect the bottom line of the company. Netflix estimated cap is reportedly over $300 billion. Podcast partners, however, gain no new transparency despite the platform’s rapid content buildout. Fewer disclosures could reignite concerns among producers about accountability.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Ken Carman: Network Executives More “Agitated” Than Me Over Delay With LeBron James’ Decision

0

LeBron James still hasn’t announced his decision on where he’s choosing to play next. 92.3 The Fan’s Ken Carman says while he’s tired of waiting, networks with billion-dollar broadcast deals are reportedly losing patience faster than he is.

What We Know: James remains a free agent weeks after leaving the Lakers. Meanwhile, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said Thursday the league can’t finalize its 2026-27 schedule until James chooses a team. On Friday, Ken Carman raised the same concern on 92.3 The Fan’s Ken Carman Show w/Anthony Lima. He argued broadcast partners are far more anxious than he is about the wait.

What They Said: (All quotes via 92.3 The Fan ‘The Ken Carman Show w/Anthony Lima)

92.3 The Fan Ken Carman says networks have to be losing their minds over the delay in LeBron James decision: “You have billion-dollar corporations that have expensive broadcast rights. They’re just sitting there waiting on it. They’re more agitated than me. Who’s in charge of NBC? Is Dick Ebersol waking up this morning, getting all really mad over LeBron James of the Peacock thing? Who’s in charge of NBC now? All the all the executives are sitting there going, “Can you make your effing decision, please, so we can put this schedule together on how to divvy up your primetime games, bud.”

92.3 The Fan Ken Carman says LeBron James delay shows his power is bigger than the league: “I’m tired of waiting. Let’s go. Let’s make the decision. But it does show his true power where he holds up the entire league, even at 41 years old. Which probably isn’t a great thing for the future of the league. It shows you the pressure on whoever takes the mantle from LeBron when he’s done.

92.3 The Fan Ken Carman says Adam Silver and the NBA allowed LeBron to have this power: “That’s the difference between the NFL and the NBA. The NFL will do everything they can to not let one person hold that power who is a player. They will do everything they can to do that. In the NBA, there’s less players. They’re more visible. There’s no helmets and visors that they’re wearing. Like it does play into the players kind of carry that power. You have the most powerful player, the most visible player, the icon of icons. Who’s still at 41 years old, just going, “I’m going to go on a podcast and I’ll make my decision whenever.” And Adam Silver’s just going to have to deal with it.”

What Remains Unclear: No firm timeline exists for James’ announcement. Carman noted James could reveal his decision “whenever,” underscoring the leverage he still holds.

What It Means: Carman’s take on network executives getting more ancee than himself is interesting. The impact of James’ return to the Cleveland Cavaliers would be more massive to the city of Cleveland than any network. However, the holdup shows how much leverage an aging superstar can wield over an entire league’s business operations. Carman argued the NBA lets players carry that kind of influence more than the NFL does. As a result, pressure keeps building on both Commissioner Silver and the league’s broadcast partners. Carman is correct in saying that it raises real questions about who inherits that kind of leverage once James eventually retires.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Confirms Schedule Creation Being Delayed by Lebron James’ Decision

0

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver wants an answer. LeBron James isn’t giving one yet, but he says it will come soon.

What We Know: James is an unrestricted free agent after informing the Lakers he wouldn’t return for the 2026-27 season. He appeared at Fanatics Fest on Thursday for a live Mind the Game podcast taping alongside Tyrese Haliburton. From there, he joined the Game Plan Summit but again avoided naming a team. Meanwhile, agent Rich Paul has said James already has “all the information needed” to choose. Moreover, Commissioner Adam Silver also spoke at Fanatics Fest. He reveals that the schedule release is being delayed over James’ decision.

What They Said: (All quotes from Fanatics Fest)

Adam Silver on LeBron’s decision holding up the NBA schedule: “I would like him to make his announcement already, so we can finish the schedule. As you might imagine, the teams are calling us, the networks are calling us, and everybody wants to lock in the schedule. But it [LeBron’s decision] will influence how we set the schedule. How we set opening week, Christmas Day, etc. So I need him to make a decision.”

LeBron James on his decision taking time: “Some people were like, ‘Make damn decision ‘Bron.’ It’s not just about the team. So many other factors that I’m factoring in right now. What is not only best fits me as a player, but what best fits me as a person. What best fits me as my happiness, and also with my family as well. So there’s a lot. I won’t hold you guys up too much longer.”

What Remains Unclear: There’s no known timetable for James to finalize his decision on which team he’ll eventually play for. Consequently, a timeline for the NBA schedule also still hasn’t surfaced.

What It Means: The situation shows how much power James’ has over the league entering his 24th season in the NBA. Networks and front offices are stuck waiting alongside Silver. Therefore, every extra day of silence tightens an already compressed scheduling window. For now, patience remains everyone’s only real option.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Connoisseur Media Flips 98.5 to Bay Country Format

0

Connoisseur Media is making a big move in the Bay Area. Starting July 22 at noon, Classic Rock 98.5 K-FOX exits its primary signal after a $2 million license sale.

What We Know: K-Love Inc. is acquiring 94.5 KBAY Gilroy/San Jose, triggering a full-market shuffle. Bay Country 94.5 shifts to the 98.5 KUFX primary signal. Classic Rock K-FOX moves to 98.5 KUFX-HD2 and 99.7 KMVQ-HD3 San Francisco. The transition launches Wednesday, July 22 at 12pm.

What’s at Stake: K-FOX held a strong 5.3 share in San Jose and a 1.9 in San Francisco as of June 2026. Both are meaningful numbers for a station being pushed to HD. Meanwhile, KBAY slipped from a 4.2 to a 3.4 last month in San Jose. Cumulus Media’s 107.7 The Bone remains a direct competitor in both markets.

What Remains Unclear: It’s uncertain how K-FOX’s loyal Classic Rock audience responds to an HD-only future. HD penetration remains limited, raising questions about reach and retention. Additionally, whether KBAY’s recent ratings dip signals a trend — or just noise — is still worth watching.

What It Means: Connoisseur is making two simultaneous bets here. First, that country radio has more commercial upside on a full-power FM signal in the Bay Area. Second, that K-FOX’s Classic Rock audience is sticky enough to follow the brand to HD. Classic Rock listeners skew older and tend to be format-loyal — but HD adoption remains limited. If either assumption is wrong, this move could backfire fast. Watch the next few ratings books closely.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

ESPN Jimmy Pitaro On Bidding For 2030 FIFA World Cup Rights: “Of Course We’re Interested”

0

ESPN is officially chasing the FIFA World Cup again. Chairman Jimmy Pitaro confirmed Thursday the network will bid on 2030 rights.

What We Know: Pitaro spoke at a CNBC and Boardroom conference during Fanatics Fest in New York. ESPN carried the World Cup for two decades before FOX Sports took over in 2018. Now, several reports peg the next rights deal at around $1.5 billion to $2 billion, a sharp jump from the roughly $485 million FOX Sports reportedly paid for 2026. Netflix and YouTube are also reportedly circling the rights. Netflix owns the rights for the 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup.

What They Said: ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro (via Deadline): “We had the World Cup for two decades and it was a big part of ESPN’s identity and DNA. Of course we’re interested.”

What Remains Unclear: FIFA has yet to hold formal talks with any bidder. A price tag is unknown. Meanwhile, FOX Sports benefited financially when the 2022 Qatar tournament shifted to a fall schedule. Netflix’s existing 2027 and 2031 Women’s World Cup rights also raise questions about its men’s ambitions.

What It Means: Without a doubt, ESPN should be interested in returning to being the home of the FIFA World Cup. Moreover, the price tag will not the same from the last time the network owned the property. In addition, the price tag likely will skyrocket following this year’s tournament. Therefore, a crowded field, including Netflix and YouTube, could be more in play because of the companies that own them. While Pitaro is is signaling interest, there are still many hurdles to cross on whether it makes business sense for ESPN to carry the FIFA World Cup.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Tony Dokoupil Defends CBS News Airing Trump Election Security Address

1

Tony Dokoupil defended CBS News’ decision to cover President Donald Trump’s election security address. The anchor said journalists have a responsibility to report major presidential news.

What We Know: Tony Dokoupil opened CBS News’ coverage of President Donald Trump’s address on election security by acknowledging criticism surrounding the network’s decision to air the speech. However, he argued that the president’s remarks were inherently newsworthy. Dokoupil emphasized that CBS News’ role is to report significant events and help viewers understand them rather than avoid controversial coverage. His comments came before the network’s live coverage of Trump’s address.

What They Said: “There is an argument that it’s irresponsible to air the president’s speech tonight. But this speech will be made. It will be news. And it’s our job to cover the news. So we are. My CBS News colleagues and I are reporting tonight, along with you, to make sense of it as you will, and we will.” -Tony Dokoupil

What Remains Unclear: CBS News didn’t indicate whether Dokoupil’s statement reflected a broader editorial response to public criticism or simply served as context for that night’s coverage. Likewise, the network hasn’t detailed whether additional editorial guidelines accompanied its presentation of Trump’s remarks.

What It Means: Dokoupil’s comments highlight an ongoing debate over how news organizations should handle live presidential addresses that generate political controversy. At the same time, his remarks reinforce a longstanding newsroom philosophy that major presidential speeches deserve coverage because of their public importance. As questions about election security and media responsibility continue, broadcasters will likely face similar editorial decisions in future political events.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Why Barstool Sports Should Terrify Rock Radio Programmers

0

Dave Portnoy is the new King of All Media. It’s no longer Howard Stern. I’m a lifelong Stern fan — he probably wouldn’t object to this piece. Times change, icons evolve, and the crown moves. Stern owned it for decades. Now, Portnoy has taken the larger-than-life personality engine and built his own content empire.

Love him or hate him, the Barstool Sports ecosystem is spreading everywhere. And while it’s billed as a sports brand, that’s like saying Nike is a shoe company.

Barstool is not new. The company was successful long before most radio people had heard of it. What started as free sports papers in Boston has become a full-blown content and talent factory. Breakout talent comes from every cubicle inside their New York and Chicago offices — driving billions of digital impressions. Massive partnerships with Netflix, Fox Sports, DraftKings, and more followed.

The Barstool Blueprint

RockTernative — and all of radio — should be studying Barstool the same way everyone once tried to decode and replicate Stern. Howard’s antics got headlines, but beyond that, the magic was authenticity, risk-taking, and relentless experimentation. Barstool is checking all of those boxes.

While Portnoy’s rise echoes Stern in the ’90s, the comparison isn’t entirely fair. Their paths, content, companies, and lives are very different. However, what is fair is recognizing that both built empires by unleashing talent rather than muzzling or managing them into predictability.

Why This Matters for RockTernative

Radio likes to say, “talent is our advantage, our secret sauce.” If that’s true, why does the industry keep firing talent left and right? Where’s the farm system? Where are the up-and-comers? Good luck finding live dayparts in smaller markets — places where major-market stars once came from. Where are tomorrow’s radio stars going to come from?

And why is talent being managed and coached like a playlist? Predictable. Safe. “Don’t say it that way, say it this way. Use fewer words, don’t ever stop a minute late, and definitely have an opinion — but not a strong one, or else someone might complain.”

Meanwhile, Barstool has practical business and content standards. But they’re not afraid to let talent be talent. That may bring some foul balls, but it’ll bring a lot more home runs. They greenlight new projects, let them run, and if there’s no path to ROI, they end it. Still, they aggressively push boundaries to see what sticks.

A Pantry Full of Secret Sauces

The results speak for themselves. Barstool Sports has walk-in-sized pantries full of secret sauces: Portnoy, Big Cat, Brianna Chickenfry, Hannah Montoya, Jersey Jerry, Stu, PFT Commenter, Jon Gruden, the Chiclets — and countless more. Most of them could anchor a morning show. Instead, they’re driving podcasts, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and Netflix.

The Barstool pathway is simple: recruit, develop, let them run, promote.

Radio’s new pathway is equally simple: fire everyone possible, then overwork, underpay, and underappreciate everyone else.

Barstool has more per-capita stars than most radio, film, or TV companies. If I’m the CEO of a major broadcaster, I’m thinking about how to integrate Barstool’s spirit into my company. It’s not hard — it just takes courage and a return to the basic fundamentals radio used to own.

Barstool Brand Building Basics

  • Content First: No one is coming for the ads or what they can get just as well or better everywhere else.
  • Stars Are the Secret Sauce: There is no Barstool without their personalities. Radio mostly peddles predictable music — it needs to be in the “star-making” business again, with music as the bonus.
  • Try New Things: Not everything sticks — but nothing sticks if you don’t try.
  • Tentpole Events: Barstool runs pizza festivals, golf and gambling events, and even week-long lifestyle remotes. RockTernative used to build big events and broadcast live everywhere — today, many brands don’t even have street teams.
  • Specialty Shows: Portnoy approves verticals for niche interests that won’t go wide but can strengthen overall reach. Radio used to run Metal, Local, New, Punk, Acoustic, Deep Tracks, and even Dedication shows — not P1-centered, but passion drivers and incremental Cume growers. Those are mostly gone or buried so only vampires hear them.
  • Topical Campaigns: Barstool reacts to the world in real time — emergency press conferences, Spring Break Vegas, Summer House, “Tea by the Sea.” Living in the moment is something radio used to dominate.
  • Revenue Integration: Portnoy’s sales teams monetize through category exclusivity, content integration, live reads, and real testimonials — not long stop sets where messages go to die. DraftKings, Chevy, Mountain Dew — they see the value.

The Bottom Line

None of this is new. RockTernative invented half of it. Radio doesn’t need to reinvent its model — it just needs to remember what its model actually was. Give Dave Portnoy credit: he bet on talent, took risks, and wasn’t afraid to fail. That’s how he became the new King of All Media.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

What Audacy’s St. Louis Sale Price Suggests About the State of Selling Radio Assets

2

Audacy St. Louis finally has a number attached to its sale. A new FCC filing confirms Hoffmann Media Group is paying $20 million for the entire six-station cluster anchored by KMOX.

The deal also includes 97.1 FM Talk, 96.3 R&B, Y98, 102.5 KEZK, and Hot 98.7. Split evenly, that works out to roughly $3.3 million per station.

For context, Urban One agreed in April to pay $22 million for just two Dallas stations, KKDA and KRNB, in a deal with Service Broadcasting Group. That’s about $11 million per station — more than three times what Hoffmann is paying per signal in St. Louis.

But that comparison needs a caveat that could be easily skipped.

Dallas is the number 5 radio market in the country. St. Louis sits at No. 24. That gap looks modest on a ranking sheet, but it isn’t modest in practice. The Dallas metro’s population is nearly three times the size of St. Louis. Comparing the sale prices of brands in those two markets isn’t exactly apples-to-apples. The numbers tell you less than they seem to.

A Better Benchmark

Finding a truly comparable sale takes some digging, and even then, the picture stays messy.

Radio One bought the Indianapolis cluster from Emmis just over four years ago for $25 million, a much closer market-size match to St. Louis. That deal alone suggests Hoffmann’s $20 million wasn’t wildly out of line for a market this size.

Other recent sales complicate the story further. Connoisseur Media bought Bonneville’s four Bay Area stations last year for just $10 million total. That number looks tiny until you learn Bonneville paid $141 million for those same four stations back in 2018.

Values in this industry can swing dramatically within a single ownership cycle, and San Francisco’s collapse shows just how far a cluster’s worth can fall.

St. Louis has its own history worth revisiting, too. Hubbard bought two Emmis stations in the market, KSHE 95 and 105.7 The Point, in 2018 for $45 million. Audacy bought the other two Emmis stations that same year, 97.1 FM Talk and what’s now 96.3 R&B, for $15 million.

Furthermore, Cox Media Group sold its Tulsa cluster last year to a local owner, in a deal incredibly similar to the Audacy/Hoffman situation. It featured a heritage news/talk brand — in this case, 102.3 KRMG — with some supplemental signals. The sale price to that local ownership group? $20 million.

Go back further, and KFNS 590 sold in 2004 for $11.5 million, a package that also included two other signals, 100.7 FM KFNS and 1190 KRFT-AM. None of these numbers move in a straight line, and that’s exactly the point.

Sale price depends heavily on timing, format, and who’s buying — not just market size or signal strength alone.

A Different Kind of Value

Money isn’t the only currency in a deal like this, and St. Louis proves it. Hoffmann Media Group isn’t a stranger to the market; the Hoffmann Family of Companies already controls Lee Enterprises, which owns the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, and that print foothold changes the calculus here. Buying KMOX doesn’t just add radio revenue to the ledger — it adds instant credibility in a market where the family already has skin in the game.

There are only two ways to earn that kind of standing: build it over decades or buy it outright. KMOX has been St. Louis’s dominant news voice for a century, and it remains the flagship home of Cardinals baseball.

No amount of organic growth replicates that overnight. Hoffmann didn’t just purchase six transmitters. It purchased trust that took generations to accumulate. Now, it absolutely has to work to keep that trust. But it now has it. And that’s half the battle.

Turner’s Case for Local

Audacy CEO Kelli Turner has framed the sale as a deliberate choice rather than a distress signal. She told St. Louis employees the deal “While we were not actively looking to sell these stations, HF Companies presented an opportunity for the Company that ultimately made strong business sense for both parties.”

Those aren’t the words of an executive looking to clear inventory. Turner has also told staff that day-to-day operations, reporting structures, compensation, and benefits aren’t expected to change. Does she have any bearing over that? No, of course not. But she also didn’t say it out of pure boredom, either.

Also, it wasn’t that long ago that Audacy went through the process of shifting KMOX to a full-market FM signal on 104.1 FM. I would find it unlikely that they went through that process of rebranding a strong, heritage signal to simply offload it at the first opportunity.

Will the $20 million figure raise questions elsewhere? Almost certainly. Audacy still owns clusters in Memphis, Kansas City, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, and Buffalo, and every one of those markets could easily see potential ownership groups studying the St. Louis number closely.

But I keep coming back to fit, though. A higher number doesn’t guarantee a better outcome for KMOX’s newsroom, its staff, or its listeners, and in St. Louis, I think the right buyer mattered more than the biggest check. I genuinely believe that a local operator was high on Audacy’s priority list for any interested party. It sounds a deal that worked for everyone. You’d be hard-pressed, from where I sit, to knock it from any one side.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.