The reports this week are that Pat McAfee’s next ESPN deal could be worth somewhere between $60 million and $65 million annually.
Sixty-five million dollars. The immediate reaction is obvious. Is any media personality worth that kind of money? Is any host, analyst, insider, or commentator worth what some NFL quarterbacks make?
It’s a fair question. It’s also probably the wrong one. The more interesting question is what ESPN’s willingness to pay that kind of money says about ESPN itself.
For most of its history, ESPN operated under a very simple philosophy: nobody was bigger than ESPN. Not Chris Berman, Dan Patrick, Keith Olbermann, or Stuart Scott. Not anybody.
SportsCenter was the star. The highlights and brand was the star. The four letters mattered more than the person sitting behind the desk. Those personalities became household names, but ESPN always projected the same message. Talent would come and go. SportsCenter would remain. Viewers were loyal to ESPN, not necessarily the individuals appearing on it.
That philosophy built one of the most successful media companies in American history.
Changing Strategy
Today, however, ESPN is a very different place. The network no longer markets SportsCenter the way it once did with its iconic “This Is SportsCenter” commercials. The highlights are no longer the centerpiece of the operation.
Instead, ESPN markets personalities. Pat McAfee. Stephen A. Smith. Adam Schefter. The stars often feel larger than the shows they appear on. The center of gravity has shifted. SportsCenter used to be the destination. Now, the destination is whoever has the audience.
If the reported mega-deal figures surrounding McAfee are accurate, ESPN is willing to spend accordingly.
The company can afford it. ESPN remains one of the most valuable businesses in media. It generates an estimated $16 billion to $18 billion annually through affiliate fees, advertising, streaming, digital operations, and licensing. This isn’t a struggling company desperately throwing money around.
Stephen A. Smith reportedly earns about $20 million annually. Joe Buck, Troy Aikman, Kirk Herbstreit, and the network’s elite game analysts reportedly sit somewhere in the $15 million to $20 million range. Adam Schefter remains among the highest-paid insiders in sports media.
Now McAfee could reportedly be headed toward $60 million. The money isn’t disappearing. It’s concentrating. Which is why ESPN increasingly resembles an NFL roster more than a television network.
The old ESPN looked like a baseball team. Lots of contributors. Lots of depth. Everybody had a role. The organization was the star.
The modern ESPN looks like a franchise that just handed its quarterback a record-setting extension. Patrick Mahomes gets paid. Josh Allen gets paid. Joe Burrow gets paid. Then the front office starts looking around the roster and wondering who else it can afford.
That’s not necessarily criticism. It’s simply how modern media works.
Weighing Worth
The executives making these decisions aren’t grading talent based on whether traditional media members approve. They’re looking at audience engagement, YouTube views, and podcast downloads. Also sponsorship opportunities, social reach, and digital consumption. Younger audiences who don’t consume media the same way previous generations did.
Viewed through that lens, McAfee starts making a lot more sense. His audience follows him everywhere. His clips live for days, interviews become news, and show creates conversation. Sometimes he is the conversation. Attention has become the most valuable currency in media. McAfee generates it. Stephen A. generates it. Schefter generates it. That’s why they’re getting paid.
But every general manager knows the danger of building around stars. Once you pay one superstar, every other superstar notices.
If McAfee ends up making $60 million while Stephen A. Smith sits around $20 million, do we think his agent isn’t paying attention? Do we think comparisons aren’t being made behind closed doors? Quarterbacks reset markets. Now media stars do, too.
The moment one contract explodes, every other negotiation changes. Unlike the ESPN of old, today’s personalities aren’t necessarily interchangeable. SportsCenter survived talent departures because the audience belonged to ESPN. Today’s stars operate differently.
Pat McAfee built an audience before ESPN. Stephen A. Smith’s audience extends beyond ESPN. Their clips reach millions of people who may never actually watch ESPN itself. Their personal brands have become businesses. If one leaves, some portion of the audience leaves, too.
That’s the tradeoff.
The old ESPN owned the audience. The new ESPN rents it. Which raises another fascinating question.
If McAfee left tomorrow, could ESPN simply build another Pat McAfee? If Stephen A. walked away, could ESPN manufacture another Stephen A. Smith? History suggests personalities like that don’t get created in conference rooms. ESPN isn’t paying for another host. It’s paying because it knows there probably isn’t another Pat McAfee available.
Everyone Is Watching
Over the past decade, ESPN has gone through multiple rounds of layoffs while simultaneously handing out massive contracts to a select few stars. One does not necessarily cause the other. Corporate restructurings are more complicated than that. Rights fees increase. Streaming priorities change. Revenue shifts.
Still, it’s impossible not to notice the optics. Every time a superstar signs a record deal, somebody else is wondering whether there’s room left under the cap.
Which brings us back to the original question.
Is Pat McAfee worth $60 million a year? Maybe he is. The numbers, engagement, and audience growth may very well justify it. But that isn’t the story. The story is that ESPN has completely changed its philosophy. For decades, ESPN sold the network. It sold SportsCenter. It sold highlights.
Now it sells personalities. If Pat McAfee signs the richest deal in sports media history, it will be the ultimate confirmation that the company which once believed nobody was bigger than the ESPN brand is now betting that a few people are.
Just like every NFL team that builds around a franchise quarterback, ESPN is wagering that its stars are worth the investment.
The only question is whether there’s enough cap space left to build the rest of the roster.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.
With decades of experience behind the mic, John Lund is more than a sports commentator and weekly columnist for Barrett Media—he’s a storyteller, humorist, and true fan. He’s hosted shows in mid sized markets like Pittsburgh and Salt Lake City to larger cities like San Francisco, Detroit and Dallas. John has even hosted nationally on ESPN Radio. Known for his sharp wit and deep sports knowledge, John welcomes your feedback. Reach him on X @JohnLundRadio or by email at John@JohnLundRadio.com.
