There are few names in sports media as controversial as Jason Whitlock. Over the past three decades, Whitlock has served as both a critic and a target of criticism across sports, politics, and culture. From an early age, he admired the sage wit and sharp words of Chicago-based columnist Mike Royko. Embracing a no-nonsense, fearless approach to challenging power through the written and spoken word.

“Everything about my career was based on Mike Royko, except trying to apply it to sports. That’s what I take the most satisfaction with my career,” explained Whitlock.

Early in his career, Whitlock emerged as a budding sports media star, showcasing the bravado it takes not only to offer critique but also to accept it. He caught national attention during his time as a columnist with the Kansas City Star. From there, he transitioned to writing columns for ESPN and began hosting a variety of the network’s studio programs.

Despite his growing national presence, Whitlock never lost his critical eye. He never shied away from speaking his mind, even when addressing his contemporaries.

“I entered this profession being critical of the media,” says Whitlock. “Sports media thinks that I hate them, and I don’t. I’m a critic. If anyone legitimately listens to what I have to say, I criticize myself more harshly than anyone else… I take the shots that I take because I love sports media and understand the important role we play. I’m just disappointed that sports media has been emasculated and had our power stolen from us.”

Shifting Power of Journalism

Whitlock has experienced both sides of sports media. He is a former Division I football player, offering an athlete’s perspective, and a graduate of Ball State University with a degree in journalism. He has also worked across multiple sectors of the industry, including print, radio, and network television.

Over time, he has come to believe that traditional sports media, once rooted in journalism, has been replaced. Not by artificial intelligence or happenstance, but by what he calls “idiot athletes.”

“We went from Tony Kornheiser and Michael Wilbon being the gold standard to former athletes being the gold standard. That’s a mistake,” notes Whitlock. “What I want to do is not roll over and inspire other journalists not to roll over and accept we’re being replaced in the industry by dumb jocks. We have a right to be frustrated about that.”

Whitlock argues that too many journalists have ceded control of sports opinion and conversation. While he says he likes many of the athletes now in prominent roles, he does not believe they belong in that proverbial driver’s seat.

Athlete Power Play

He attributes this shift largely to the power leagues have allowed players to acquire. According to Whitlock, today’s athletes operate in an era of empowerment, building business relationships with corporations that also partner with franchises and team owners.

This dynamic, he says, has reshaped how journalism holds players, owners, and leagues accountable.

“Who has power and authority changed,” explains Whitlock. “Players have some level of power, and they need to be held accountable. But in business with the corporations, they don’t want their partners [athletes] to be questioned. Corporations don’t want to be questioned. The athletes, media and executives have all formed a partnership… We’ve turned over too much power and influence over to the athlete.”

Whitlock believes these relationships extend to the networks that cover the leagues. Having worked for both ESPN and FOX Sports in various roles, he says networks have deprioritized developing strong studio programming in favor of maintaining league partnerships.

Instead of leaning on journalism as their foundation, networks often rely on athletes who already maintain business ties with the leagues.

“They’re very limited in what they can do. They need to create content that promotes these leagues, moving away from journalists who will say what they think from time to time,” said Whitlock. “I don’t think the industry moved away from journalism and truth. It’s because of the partnerships between the leagues, media companies, and the advertisers that has caused what we have now.”

Fearless Criticism

In 2021, Whitlock found a new home with Glenn Beck’s Blaze Media company. He hosts a daily podcast, Fearless, which he describes as roughly 95% sports content, with elements of culture and politics woven in. He believes sports provide a gateway to discussing broader issues in American society due to their wide-ranging touchpoints.

At his core, Whitlock sees himself as a media critic, a role rooted in his admiration for Mike Royko. That stance has led to numerous public disputes with high-profile media figures.

None more notable than his clashes with ESPN First Take commentator Stephen A. Smith, whom many view as having followed a similar career path.

“As a culture critic, sportswriter, and a commentator. He’s done nothing that I’m jealous of. He’s a really bad knockoff of what I do and have done in this industry. Does it disappoint me that the sports media world and corporations would rather have a horrible knockoff of what I do? Instead of the real authentic thing? Yes, it frustrates and irritates me,” explained Whitlock.

Whitlock insists he holds no jealousy toward Smith or his status with ESPN and SiriusXM Radio, among others. In fact, he says he praises Smith when he agrees with him—albeit a rare occurrence.

Regarding ESPN positioning Smith as the face of the network, reportedly with a $20 million annual salary, Whitlock believes more qualified journalists were overlooked.

“I’m just honest enough to say that’s a travesty. Everyone else will avoid talking about it because they don’t want to seem jealous. It’s not jealousy, it’s a travesty. People with real credentials in real sports journalism are there. ESPN choose otherwise,” explained Whitlock. “If ESPN is going to anoint someone as the face of their organization when there were so many other options, then shame on all of us.”

Building A Brand On Digital

Now in his fifth year hosting Fearless, Whitlock continues to chart his own course in the spirit of Mike Royko, leaving few opinions unspoken. He believes there is still much to accomplish in the evolving sports media landscape.

Even as he operates within a digital ecosystem driven by algorithms and news feeds, Whitlock feels he is only beginning to tap into what lies ahead.

“I’m going to continue my path in this new digital sports media environment,” notes Whitlock. “I know that I’m going against what you’re supposed to say. So, the algorithms are never going to be on my side. I think I got a lot to accomplish and look forward to.”

And perhaps that’s the full-circle truth. Jason Whitlock didn’t just admire Mike Royko—he built his entire approach around him. Not the platform or the popularity, but the posture: a willingness to be uncomfortable and to challenge power, even at the cost of access, approval, or applause.

In an era where sports media is shaped by partnerships, branding, and carefully managed voices, Whitlock has chosen a different lane—one that isolates as often as it elevates. It’s messy, polarizing, and at times undeniably abrasive.

Whether viewed as a necessary critic or an unrelenting provocateur, Whitlock’s career underscores a central question facing modern sports media: not just who gets to speak, but who is still willing to risk something when they do. In that sense, love him or loathe him, Whitlock remains what he set out to be—not a product of the system, but a throwback to a time when columnists like Mike Royko didn’t just cover the conversation—they challenged it.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.