Home Blog Page 2538

The Top 20 Mid-Market Afternoon Shows of 2017 Are…

0

The midway point of the week is where we celebrate the programs who entertain our audiences as they head home from work each afternoon. This category is ultra competitive and features some of the best talk talent on the radio airwaves, period.

When the Mid Market honors were handed out last year, the award was given to 3HL of 104.5 The Zone in Nashville. The Tennessee trio have been very successful for quite some time, but despite a stellar track record and strong showing in 2017, a new show has taken the afternoon crown this year.

Congratulations goes out to The Bull and Fox on 92.3 The Fan in Cleveland. Adam “The Bull” Gerstenhaber and Dustin Fox ended 2017 by finishing 1st in the ratings in their market with Men 25-54. Their performance throughout the year in one of America’s greatest sports cities was good enough to earn them this year’s honor.

As we acknowledge in each Top 20 posting, our rankings are determined by a panel of radio executives who use the following criteria below to make their choices. BSM does not vote in this process. We simply add up the votes, design the graphics, and present a collective snapshot for people inside and outside of the industry to gain a better understanding of how sports radio’s top decision makers view the format’s best programs.

  • Ratings success in their local market
  • Quality content and on-air presentation
  • An established track record of success in the format
  • Spent more than six months hosting on a Mid Market sports radio station
  • Points are given for each ranking (EX: 20 points for 1st place, 1 point for 20th place)

Please remember that these results reflect the group’s collective opinions. This means they are subjective. However, it’s difficult to argue with the success and respect of each of these shows in their respective markets.

We salute all of the shows who were recognized this year by our panel and are proud to bring to you “BSM’s Top 20 Mid Market Afternoon Shows of 2017”!

Additional Notes:

  • 3HL earned the most 1st place votes (11); Bull & Fox were second with (10)
  • Spots 2-3, 5-6, 10-11 and 15-19 were separated by only 3 points
  • The Drive with CDot and Fanning finished 21st place, 3 points behind Frank Frangie
  • 22-25 were Scott Garceau w/ Jeremy Conn, The Ride w/ JMV, The Big Show and Cofield & Company
  • 10 of the 37 afternoon shows eligible for consideration received a 1st place vote
  • This is the first list appearance for Frank Frangie, Bo Mattingly, The Huge Show and Unsportsmanlike Conduct

The Top 20 Major Market Afternoon Shows of 2017 Are…

0

The midway point of the week is where we celebrate the programs who entertain our audiences as they head home from work each afternoon. This category is ultra competitive and features some of the best talk talent on the radio airwaves, period.

During the past two years, Mike Francesa has laid claim to this award. The New York sports radio legend has since exited his former radio home WFAN, which means that in 2018 things will be very different. But in 2017, Mike occupied the afternoon slot and went out the same way he started, on top. His consistent performance has earned him a great deal of respect from broadcasting executives and that was made clear once again in this year’s voting, as he was chosen for the third straight time as the format’s best Major Market Afternoon Show. His voting total was the highest of any local sports radio program.

To determine our Top 20 Major Market rankings, we involve a large number of radio industry executives from multiple companies and different cities across the country. They select the Top 20 programs by using the criteria below. BSM does not vote in this process. We simply add up the votes, design the graphics, and present a collective snapshot for people inside and outside of the industry to gain a better understanding of how sports radio’s top decision makers view the format’s best programs.

  • Ratings success in their local market
  • Quality content and on-air presentation
  • An established track record of success in the format
  • Spent more than six months hosting on a Major Market sports radio station
  • Points are given for each ranking (EX: 20 points for 1st place, 1 point for 20th place)

Remember, these results reflect the group’s collective opinions. This means they are subjective. However, most would agree that each of these shows have earned the industry’s respect and play an important role in helping each of their brands achieve success.

We extend our congratulations to Mike and each of the shows who were recognized by our panel this year and now proudly present “BSM’s Top 20 Major Market Afternoon Shows of 2017”!

Additional Notes:

  • Mike Francesa earned the most 1st place votes (25)
  • Waddle & Silvy and Felger & Massarotti tied for the second most 1st place votes (5)
  • 8 of the 30 afternoon shows eligible for consideration received a 1st place vote
  • The closest race was for 13th where Chad Dukes finished 1 point ahead of Ben & Skin
  • Kelvin, Marcellus & E.D finished in 21st place, 7 points behind Dave ‘Softy’ Mahler
  • 22-25 = Chuck & Chernoff, Danny, Dave & Moore, The Loose Cannons and Steve Czaban
  • This is Dukes & Bell and Hochman & Crowder’s first appearance on the list

The BSM Top 20 Mid-Market Midday Shows of 2017 Are…

0

It’s Day 2 of the BSM 2017 Top 20 in Sports Radio awards. Today, we highlight the best Mid Market midday programs airing across the nation. Before you skip ahead to see the rankings, let us remind you of a few things.

To determine our rankings we involve a panel of radio executives and they each use the criteria below to make their decisions. BSM does not vote in this process. We simply add up the votes, design the graphics, and present a collective snapshot for people inside and outside of the industry to gain a better understanding of how sports radio’s top decision makers view the format’s best programs.

Remember that these results are subjective. The members of our panel live in various cities and have different insights and preferences. They also work for different companies, which may or may not factor into their thinking. We try our best to keep the process fair and balanced, and although there will be debates over the selections, it’s hard to argue against the respect and success that each of these programs have earned in their local markets and among the industry’s top decision makers.

  • Ratings success in their local market
  • An established track record of success in the format
  • Spent more than six months hosting on a Mid Market sports radio station
  • Points are given for each ranking (EX: 20 points for 1st place, 1 point for 20th place)

When we last conducted this process, Dan Dakich of 107.5/1070 The Fan in Indianapolis received the most votes from our panel to be named the top Mid Market midday program of 2016. This year though, Dan must reluctantly part with the trophy as it’s being shipped to Nashville to its new recipients, The Midday 180 of 104.5 The Zone.

The team of Jonathan Hutton, Paul Kuharsky and Chad Withrow have been a steady force in the Nashville market. They’ve delivered double digit ratings on a regular basis, earning themselves new contracts and an expansion from three hours per day to four. We extend our congratulations to Chad, Jonathan, Paul and the entire Zone team, as well as every other show which earned a spot on this year’s list. Now without further delay, here are “BSM’s Top 20 Mid Market Midday Shows of 2017”!

Additional Notes:

  • Midday 180 and Dan Dakich tied for the most 1st place votes (8); JOX Roundtable was second with (4)
  • Spots 5-6 and 18-19 were separated by 1 point; Spots 15-16 were apart by just 2 points
  • The Day Shift came in 21st place, 4 points behind Erik Ainge
  • 22-25 were The Hardline w/ Ari & Chance, Jason & John, Bob Valvano and Grady & Big Joe
  • 11 of the 37 afternoon shows eligible for consideration received a 1st place vote

The Top 20 Major Market Midday Shows of 2017 Are…

0

It’s Day 2 of our BSM 2017 Top 20 in Sports Radio, and today the focus is on the best Major Market midday programs airing across the nation. Before you skip ahead to see the rankings, let us point out a few things.

The voting for these awards each year includes a large panel of radio executives from a number of different companies. They make their choices by using the following criteria below. BSM does not vote in this process. We simply add up the votes, design the graphics, and present a collective snapshot for people inside and outside of the industry to gain a better understanding of how sports radio’s top decision makers view the format’s best programs.

  • Strong local ratings in 2017
  • An established track record in the format
  • Spent more than six months hosting on a Major Market sports radio station
  • Points are given for each ranking (EX: 20 points for 1st place, 1 point for 20th place)

We remind you that this process is an inexact science. Each member of our executive committee has different insights and preferences, and may or may not favor members of their own company or programs they’re most familiar with. We do our best to keep the process fair and balanced by having individuals involved from multiple companies and different cities, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Moving along to the rankings, at this time last year, our executive panel awarded top billing to ESPN LA 710’s Mason & Ireland. Although the Southern California duo was well represented this year too, their spot atop the midday rankings has been taken by a duo broadcasting 3,000 miles away.

The 2017 honor goes to Joe & Evan of WFAN in New York. This is their first time earning the top spot. The New York pair finished 4th in 2016 and 2nd in 2015. We extend our congratulations to Mr. Beningo and Mr. Roberts on being recognized by the panel as the best in their daypart for 2017, and every other show which earned a spot on this year’s list. Now, without further adieu, here are “BSM’s Top 20 Mid Market Midday Shows of 2017”!

Additional Notes:

  • Joe & Evan received the most 1st place votes (14)
  • OMF and Zo & Betrand were separated by 4 points
  • Spots 12-13 and 17-18 were just 1 point apart
  • John Clayton finished 21st, 7 points behind Bob, Groz & Tom
  • 22-25 was Humpty/Canty/Rothenberg, Rick & John, Front Row and Bickley & Marotta
  • 9 of the 37 afternoon shows eligible for consideration received a 1st place vote

The Top 20 Mid-Market Morning Shows of 2017 Are…

0

The wait is over. It’s time to reveal the sports radio format’s Top 20 Mid Market morning shows of 2017. Before we get started, here are a few things to be aware of.

The voting for these awards is done by a large panel comprised of radio executives from a number of different companies. They make their choices by using the following criteria below. BSM does not vote in this process. We simply add up the votes, design the graphics, and present a collective snapshot for people inside and outside of the industry to gain a better understanding of how sports radio’s top decision makers view the format’s best programs.

  • Strong local ratings in 2017
  • An established track record in the format
  • Quality content delivered on a consistent basis
  • Spent more than six months hosting on a Major Market sports radio station
  • Points are given for each ranking (EX: 20 points for 1st place, 1 point for 20th place)

When this award was voted on last year, St. Louis sports radio host Bernie Miklasz of 101 ESPN earned top honors. For 2017, Miklasz can breathe a sigh of relief and light up a cigar because he has once again been chosen by our executive panel as the top Mid Market morning show of 2017.

Bernie’s ability to drive ratings and revenue have been vital to 101 ESPN’s success. He has been St. Louis’ go to source for sports information and opinion for decades, and this latest recognition is an added bonus on top of a brand new contract with Hubbard Radio and the addition of on-air partner Michelle Smallmon.

We extend our congratulations to Bernie and the 101 team, as well as every other show which earned a spot on this year’s list. Now without further adieu, here are “BSM’s Top 20 Mid Market Morning Shows of 2017”!

Additional Notes:

  • Bernie Miklasz received the most 1st place votes (8); Carman & Lima had the second most (3)
  • Wake Up Zone edged the Morning Animals by 1 point; Bruce Hooley did the same to DJ & PK
  • 7 of the 30 morning shows eligible for consideration received a 1st place vote
  • The Bottom Line w/ Chip Brown finished 21st, 7 points behind The Drill
  • 22-25 were The Morning After, Franchise Mornings, The Show w/ No Name and Cole Cubelic
  • This is the first appearance on the list for Carmichael Dave, Bruce Hooley and The Deener Show

The Top 20 Major Market Morning Shows of 2017 Are…

0

The wait is over. It’s time to reveal the sports radio format’s Top 20 Major Market morning shows of 2017. Before we get started though, here are a few things to be aware of.

The voting for these awards is done by a large panel comprised of radio executives. They make their choices by using the following criteria below. Many have different insights and preferences, and some may or may not favor members of their own company or programs they’re more familiar with. We try to keep things fair and balanced by including people from multiple companies and different cities, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

BSM does not vote in this process. We simply add up the votes, design the graphics, and present a collective snapshot for people inside and outside of the industry to gain a better understanding of how sports radio’s top decision makers view the format’s best programs.

  • Strong local ratings in 2017
  • An established track record in the format
  • Quality content delivered on a consistent basis
  • Spent more than six months hosting on a Major Market sports radio station
  • Points are given for each ranking (EX: 20 points for 1st place, 1 point for 20th place)

Moving on to the rankings, “Boomer & Carton” of WFAN in New York won this award each of the past two years. However, Carton and The Fan parted ways in September, leaving Esiason to go thru a morning show host search for the final few months of the year before deciding on Gregg Giannotti to be his new radio partner in 2018. Those changes left the door open for another program to break thru and the executive panel found that show in Boston’s “Kirk & Callahan.”

The WEEI morning duo thrived in 2017, turning in double digit ratings, and finishing 1st with Men 25-54 during the spring, summer and fall books. They were 2nd in the winter book too. Boston has been a hotbed for sports radio for decades and Kirk and Gerry’s unconventional approach to delivering must-listen programming for Boston sports radio fans has served them well and gained the attention and respect of our voters.

We salute Kirk & Gerry on earning this year’s top honor, as well as each of the other morning shows who were recognized. Now, here are the full results of “BSM’s Top 20 Major Market Morning Shows of 2017”!

Additional Notes:

  • Kirk & Callahan had the most 1st place votes (17); The Musers were second (9)
  • Hardwick & Richards finished 21st, 8 points behind Cooley & Kevin
  • 22-25 belonged to Joe/Lo/Dibs, Nick & Chris, Ronnie & TKras and Fricke & Douglas
  • 9 of the 28 morning shows eligible for consideration received a 1st place vote
  • This is Josh Innes’ first appearance on the list in mornings
  • Dan Sileo is no longer hosting mornings on the Mighty 1090
  • WFAN has since added Gregg Giannotti to mornings with Boomer Esiason

Jemele Hill is Leaving SC6 and Moving to The Undefeated

0

As first reported by Richard Deitsch of Sports Illustrated, Jemele Hill is leaving the 6pm ET SC6 edition of SportsCenter on ESPN. Hill will leave the show February 2nd to take on a role with The Undefeated, ESPN’s website dedicated to the intersection of sports, race and culture, and as an on-air commentator on programs such as SportsCenterOutside the LinesAround the HornHighly QuestionablePardon the Interruption, E:60 and various radio programs and podcasts produced by ESPN Audio.

“There is an old adage that says, the heart wants what it wants,” said Hill. “I started at ESPN 11 years ago as a columnist and while I have worn many hats in the time since, my true love always has been writing, reporting and commentary. While I have grown in every way imaginable this last year on the 6 p.m. SportsCenter, deep down I knew it wasn’t my calling. I approached (ESPN Executive Vice President, Content) Connor Schell recently and asked if they would consider re-thinking my role. And as has been the case throughout my 11 years at this company, ESPN graciously worked with me to determine the best way for me to continue to do meaningful work.

“My first choice was to work with The Undefeated, a site that covers the intersection of race, African-American culture and sports in creative and compelling ways,” she added. “I admire, trust and have unconditional respect for (ESPN Senior Vice President & Editor-in-Chief) Kevin Merida and The Undefeated staff. I have no doubt we will create amazing content together. I’m also thankful to Connor for not only hearing my request, but being immensely supportive throughout this process. I have longed for some time to return to my roots, so to speak. I’m ecstatic to be in such a supportive environment to explore the next phase in my career.

“I’d also like to thank my co-host Michael Smith for his encouragement, generosity and support,” she said. “I will be cheering him on as the 6 p.m. SportsCenter evolves with him as lead anchor. The SC6 staff also has my utmost gratitude and affection. Thank you for your hard work and contributions.”

Although the narrative being pushed by ESPN suggests Hill requested the role change, others aren’t buying it. FOX Sports Radio host Clay Travis, who’s broken numerous stories on ESPN, has been saying on the air for weeks that Hill would be gone from SC6 after the Super Bowl because the show’s ratings were abysmal.

It’s well documented that Hill put a massive bullseye on ESPN’s reputation when she took President Trump to task on Twitter, labeling him a white supremacist. That was followed up by encouraging Dallas Cowboys fans to boycott sponsors of America’s team, an act which earned her a suspension.

Complicating matters even more was that Hill and Smith’s former program, His and Hers, was drastically different than SportsCenter. When the network attempted to mesh the two together and develop SC6, it left a bad taste in the mouth’s of many traditional viewers, leading them to reject the program. That approach also placed Smith and Hill in a box to deliver a stylistically different version of their show, rather than the one which they were most comfortable executing.

The decline of the program’s ratings, coupled with the dissatisfaction of the show from many involved, led to internal role changes for ESPN managers Rob King, Dave Roberts and Norby Williamson. The Big Lead pointed out that turmoil had existed behind the scenes for quite some time, but there was a possibility of Hill and Smith returning to the daytime lineup to reprise their His & Hers program. Once Smith parted ways though with the duo’s mutual agent, Evan Dick of CAA, it became clear that the pair would soon be heading in different directions.

While Hill may be pursuing a new challenge, the network is counting on Smith to become the lead anchor of the 6pm ET SportsCenter.

“The telecast continues to evolve as our primary mission is serving sports fans no matter the time of day,” Williamson said. “We have clearly learned that viewers expect the most comprehensive news coverage and compelling analysis during the 6 p.m. hour. Michael Smith is an experienced journalist and seasoned commentator and I’m confident that his talents can help us achieve our objectives as we move forward.”

What will be interesting to follow is how Hill adjusts to her new role and if it’s enough to satisfy her long term. It’s certainly possible she could become a permanent fixture on The Undefeated, but her passion for discussing topics beyond sports, and the growth of her profile are likely to earn her future attention from outlets such as CNN or MSNBC. Her current employer could also pursue utilizing her on ABC if they feel a fit makes sense.

The XFL’s Return is About Strategy and Second Chances

0

Imagine for a minute what it would be like if we didn’t allow people to learn from their mistakes and earn second opportunities. Bill Belichick wouldn’t be leading the Patriots into another Super Bowl. Nick Foles wouldn’t be starting against him. Steve Jobs wouldn’t have saved Apple and turned it into a global success. Oprah Winfrey wouldn’t have become a revered TV personality. Jay-Z and Lady Gaga wouldn’t have become international music stars.

I could list example after example, but you get the point.

Failure owns real estate on the highway to success. You can try to avoid it, but at some point in your life, it’s going to suck you in. What’s important to remember when you face it is that it’s there to teach you a lesson. It may bruise your ego and make you question if you’re good enough or on the right track, but nobody reaps a lifetime of rewards without having their convictions challenged and their confidence rattled.

I bring this to light because on Thursday, Vince McMahon announced he was ready to gamble a second time on the XFL. The league is scheduled to begin play in 2020 and McMahon is hoping this time to learn from his past mistakes and see his dream of running a successful football league finally become a reality.

When the XFL folded in 2001, it was in bad shape. Sponsors fled. So too did the league’s television partner, NBC. Most importantly though, the audience had rejected the brand because the on the field product was inferior to what they were accustomed to watching.

McMahon at that time tried to introduce sex, violence and sideshow antics to give people a reason to tune in, coupled with appearances by WWE personalities. The problem with that formula was that although Americans can’t turn away from observing a car crash, once they see what’s taken place, they drive away. Which is exactly what they did every time an XFL game appeared on their TV schedule.

As bad as the original XFL on the field product was, some of the league’s ideas were good. Players were mic’d up. Unique camera angles were introduced. Player introductions were featured before the first series of play. They were innovative at the time, and wound up becoming a bigger part of the NFL’s television experience.

Upon announcing the news, social media was flooded with people declaring the league dead upon arrival. I ran a poll question on Twitter asking folks what percentage chance do they give the league of being successful the second time around. 58% said 0-25%, 23% went with 26-50%, 13% voted for 51-75% and 6% gave it a 76-100% chance of succeeding.

What I find interesting about that is that we haven’t learned our lesson. We’ve allowed our memories of the old XFL to shape what we think the second version will be. We’ve also read into comments made in a press conference and decided from them whether or not this league will work. We haven’t seen one player signed, one game played, one media partner added or one football executive hired to help McMahon make the most of his second chance.

I point this out because when the XFL held its introductory press conference nearly two decades ago, they promised an aggressive style of play and a whole lot of male focused entertainment. They also fired a few shots at the NFL. The public ate it up, and once the league began airing their edgy promos, mainstream interest grew. It spread so fast that the league’s first game was watched by an estimated 14 million people, helping it deliver an incredible 9.5 rating. The problem was that after football fans tuned in, just like a car crash, they observed the scene and drove away.

None of us know whether or not the XFL will work in 2020. But what I love about this story is how it involves strategy and the pursuit of redemption.

One thing to know about Vince McMahon, when he sees an opening, he seizes it. It’s why the WWE Network has become a success, WCW is no longer in business, and why brands like YouTube, Facebook, E and others have invested millions in doing business with him.

It’s no secret that the NFL has turned off a lot of fans with their willingness to allow players to speak their minds on social and political issues. The decision to give players a choice of either standing, sitting or kneeling during the national anthem is another which has troubled people and generated a lot of negative national media attention.

But that’s not all.

NFL TV ratings have declined each of the past two seasons. Booth reviews and over-analyzing the rules have led to debates over what is and isn’t a catch, QB’s have been treated like they operate behind a force field, pass interference often affects the outcome of games, and kickoffs have been changed to discourage collisions between players running at maximum speed.

Add to the conversation CTE issues, frequent stories of players being arrested (does Ray Rice ring a bell?), and a seven month period where the most popular sport in our country goes on hiatus, leaving fans starving for something to sink their teeth into. That’s especially noticeable during the months of February and March.

When you take all of that into consideration and combine it with the rise of social media and brands such as Amazon, Twitter and Facebook expressing interest in paying for content, sports betting being on the brink of legalization, and the WWE’s television deal with USA expiring in September 2019, you can see why McMahon is rolling the dice.

So how do you take advantage of those opportunities? You do what McMahon is doing.

For starters, the XFL will play a ten game season starting in late January or early February. That’s right when the NFL ends their season and interest is at its peak. The rule book will be simplified to keep the pace of the game fast, commercial breaks will be shorter to retain interest, and traditional things like a halftime break will be eliminated to make games shorter. McMahon also plans to incorporate fan participation and online activities into the XFL experience.

The biggest noise was made though when McMahon announced that any player who competes in the XFL will be required to stand for the national anthem, and players with prior arrests will not be invited to participate. The WWE Chairman and CEO said he’s looking to provide family friendly entertainment and place the focus on the game of football, not on issues beyond the gridiron.

Given his lifelong connection to the world of professional wrestling and the XFL’s prior use of WWE stars, many wondered if McMahon would align the two brands again. Recognizing how that could affect the perception of the league, McMahon said the WWE’s talent will have zero involvement with the XFL nor will any members of its broadcast team. He also made it clear that he was looking to stay out of the spotlight himself and hire smart football people to help him create a high quality football product.

McMahon’s strategic approach is smart and one that each broadcasting executive would pursue if faced with trying to launch a product opposite a dominant competitor. Whether it’ll work or not will depend on what the product looks like in 2020 and what the football fan’s appetite is for more football right after the NFL season expires.

But not to be forgotten in this story is the lesson of learning from failure and taking second chances.

Vince McMahon is an entertainment industry hall of famer. He built the WWE into an iconic brand by taking risks, among them creating WrestleMania, which had it failed, would have likely bankrupted the company. He didn’t need to invest his money and gamble again on the XFL, but it’s a project he loves and is passionate about it. As a result, he’s taking a second chance to try and get it right.

Maybe this will turn out bad and Vince’s legacy takes a hit. But ask yourself this question, if you were 72, highly successful, and had the stain of the XFL on your professional record, would you have the guts to try again to erase that mistake or would you just let it linger and take it with you to the grave one day?

The reality is that most people in McMahon’s shoes would’ve worried too much about their reputation being tarnished to risk pursuing the same dream that became their worst nightmare. It’s easy to operate safe and avoid publicly being ridiculed but learning from mistakes and bouncing back is what makes many of the things we do in life important.

As I think about this story, I’m reminded of a scene in the movie “Pursuit of Happiness” where Christopher Gardner (Will Smith) tells his son, “You got a dream? You got to protect it. People can’t do something themselves so they want to tell you that you can’t do it. If you want something, go get it.”

Well, Vince, you deserve credit for crafting a good strategy and having the courage to try again. But this time, you’ll need more than that to make this work. Football fans are going to expect a quality product. If they don’t get it, they’ll once again have two words for you, “You’re Fired.”

How Much Value Do Hosts Place on Radio Row Broadcasts?

0

It was one year ago when I wrote a lengthy piece on the challenges associated with broadcasting live on radio row during the week of the Super Bowl. I tapped into a few program directors and top salespeople to gain their perspectives on why the week on the road for their brands does/doesn’t matter.

As insightful as last year’s column was, I realized that one key part was missing from the conversation. The viewpoint of the people who it matters most to – the on-air talent.

It’s easy to sit in a conference room and debate the merits of sending your shows on the road or crunch numbers in an office during budgeting sessions and eliminate travel and remote broadcast expenses because it’ll make your bottom line look better but there are certain things in business that you do because it’s important to your people, your brand image and your audience.

For example, how would your perception of a NewsTalk brand change if their key programs weren’t live at the Republican and Democrat national conventions? To make those events work, extra dollars must be spent and sometimes sponsors don’t want to get involved because they don’t want to be branded as supporting one side over the other. If the NewsTalk outlet you receive your information and opinion from though wasn’t there, your perception of the brand and its shows would be altered.

Imagine if a massive rock concert like Lollapalooza was recreated and your favorite rock station wasn’t involved in it. Or if a rap festival was produced and your hometown hip hop station didn’t have a connection to it. You’d wonder why those brands were detached from something significant to the audience and their image would take a hit as a result of it.

Well, the same applies in sports talk radio.

There is no greater event from an audience attention standpoint than the Super Bowl. The NFL is king and responsible for stealing the majority of our free time during the fall. The final game represents the last chapter of the season, and the week leading up to it is when fans become consumed by the storylines surrounding the NFL’s season finale.

From a talk show host’s perspective, this is the nail in the coffin on a year’s worth of conversations. Hours upon hours are dedicated to analyzing, debating and reporting on the NFL each season, and the most hosts view the week of the Super Bowl as one of the most important to their annual schedule. It’s an opportunity to get access to high profile people, uncover interesting stories, receive exclusive access to events they’d otherwise not experience, and it affords them the chance to spend time on the road with their peers and colleagues. That alone leads to strengthening bonds, increasing contacts, gathering information, and enjoying time away from the normal grind. The audience is invited to live vicariously thru the eyes and ears of the talent during the NFL’s biggest week, and in doing so, a deeper bond is developed between the brand and each listener.

What makes topics like this fun to discuss is that there really is no right answer. If your business is hemorrhaging money and lacks interest from sponsors, it’s understandable why you’d pass on sending your hosts and shows on the road. But if every decision you make is tied to whether or not you generate an immediate return on investment, be prepared to be disappointed.

It’s ironic that the radio industry depends on selling advertising to clients, stressing to them the importance of branding. We encourage sponsors to implement a long term strategy and remind them of the need to spend money to make money. We preach how vital it is to stand out from a crowded field and why presenting a powerful image and influencing perception are key in reaching people when it’s time to make a purchase.

What we don’t do is walk in the door with pixie dust promising to sprinkle it on their ads and double their business. That’d be ridiculous. Effective marketing requires consistency and building a strong brand image. If done properly, brands will absolutely benefit from it.

Yet when the shoe is on the other foot, do we follow our own advice? To borrow Hertz’s slogan, not exactly!

There are a myriad of factors that need to be considered when deciding whether or not to send your radio station and staff on the road to the Super Bowl. From the ratings impact, to the perception of the brand, to the economic affect on your company’s balance sheet, everything must be examined. However, just don’t lose sight during that process of how those decisions register with two of the most important components of your business – your staff – and your audience.

To provide a little more perspective I called upon six talented hosts from different parts of the country who have experienced the good and bad of radio row. Making the conversation even more interesting is the fact that they collectively represent five different companies.

For those of you who are scheduled to broadcast next week on radio row in Minneapolis, I recommend checking out this list of restaurant/bar suggestions from 1500 ESPN Twin Cities midday host Phil Mackey. You can thank him in person next week for steering you to the right locations.

Why is broadcasting live from radio row during the week of the Super Bowl important to you?

McKee: I have been to 14 Super Bowls. So, I’ve had plenty of radio row experience. In the mid 90’s it seemed like a pretty exciting deal. We would get a cool collection of guests that we wouldn’t get any other way. However, as the years move along, the quality of guests seems to have leveled off. Also, getting interesting guests is complicated because there is such a strict schedule. Then of course there is the question of whether listeners even care about hearing from any of these people. In addition, we haven’t seen a specific spike in ratings during that week. BUT – if you are a sports station in America and you aren’t there how serious are you? The trick is to use radio row as a home base and actually go out and do the work which means getting off your ass and going to the pressers and the other available sessions. The access to players, coaches and other folks in the sports world is off the charts. If you stay anchored on radio row, you better hope you have a world class producer who can do some pretty extraordinary things or you’re going to be talking to Bill Romanowski about his neuro lean 1 pills. So broadcasting from radio row means almost nothing to me, but being at the Super Bowl feels like it’s very important!

Kaplan: This is my 22nd radio row which is crazy! I look forward to the week of the Super Bowl because I like to be in the middle of the action. If I didn’t go, I would be watching on TV wishing I was there. It’s the sports radio convention, like the Senior Bowl of sports radio. It’s something I feel is important to be in the middle of.

Dawson: It’s important primarily because we are the home of the Cowboys. The NFL is the most significant sports entity in our market and not being there would feel off brand in a big way. Our competition will be there and to my knowledge, I’m not aware of a regular weekday 6a-7p show in my market that hasn’t gone.

Innes: It’s not. I thought it was important to broadcast from radio row when it was in Houston. I host a morning show, so I won’t be getting a ton of guests, and the building will be largely empty. I don’t believe it adds a ton to my actual show. Hosts love to say that they can get more out of guests and that it’s all about the questions. Trust me, when Adam Sandler is on station #20 and has been up for 25 hours, he’s not gonna be excited.

Dougherty: Broadcasting live from radio row is important to me because we want to provide Zone listeners with the best content possible, every day. Radio row at the Super Bowl allows us to do that by gaining access to compelling guests who we normally wouldn’t have an opportunity to connect with. Being there helps us deliver a stream of interesting content all week.

Tierney: Very early in my career, it was probably good for the ego, a self-validation of my place in the business. However, as my platforms have grown, it’s become much more of a bridge…a tool…a continuation of the coverage and insight we’ve provided throughout the season. Although I don’t believe in being guest-heavy day to day, we take great pride in being able to secure “A” list guests throughout the season. This is not only a continuation of that, but in essence, a culmination of a season/sport that we dedicate a lot of time, energy and resources to. I want to be there, I expect to be there.

If you didn’t do shows on radio row during SB week, how would it impact your show?

McKee: If I wasn’t there we would still have a table and a set up to put a guest on headphones but that’s pretty weak. I suppose I’d feel left out. It’s an interesting question though and I’m not sure I have the answer because this will be my 9th straight radio row. I have 6 others sprinkled in over the years. What makes this year particularly interesting is that I pushed hard for our station to go to the Senior Bowl. We have great ownership and management and they made an extremely quick pivot so we could be in Mobile, Alabama this week! The reasoning was simple. The Broncos need a QB, and Mayfield, Allen, Falk and Rudolph will all be there along with the Broncos coaching staff which includes a bunch of new guys who are coaching the north team. The STORY for us is clearly in Mobile not Minneapolis. That always should come first. So I’m proud of my station that we’re doing what’s best for our listeners. We were ready to give up going to the Super Bowl but because Minnesota is such an awful place to go to in February, the hotel costs have plummeted! At the end of the day, we can do both and stay under budget. So, I’m going to both! Guys often bitch about having to spend the time and effort away from home but that couldn’t possibly match how much they’d complain about NOT going! We are a messed up crew of individuals.

Kaplan: I’m not sure broadcasting from the Super Bowl is a ratings winner per se, but from a perception standpoint, listeners believe their favorite show is big time by being on radio row. They enjoy hearing the show talk to people that they wouldn’t normally have face to face access to. It leads to good content and it’s where new relationships are formed!

Dawson: I’m not sure what the impact would be since we do make the trip each year. Listeners would question though why we weren’t there.

Innes: We may miss out on the opportunity to do a few memorable bits, but all in all I don’t think the show would suffer greatly. The idea of going to radio row is so much greater than actually going to radio row. I mean, how many times can I interview a member of the 70’s Steelers?

Dougherty: If we didn’t do live shows from radio row, we would do our normal daily show. The difference would be that we’d have less coverage dedicated to the Super Bowl.

Tierney: No interesting/successful show should lean solely on the backdrop of the SB to create a compelling show. That’s lazy, especially when each interview is going to contain a minute or so of the guest pushing product that quite frankly, our audience doesn’t care much about. It’s still about strong content, diverse and interesting topics and having fun and I have confidence that we would deliver that from our studio. However, there’s an energy that is tough to replicate that comes with being in the middle of the mayhem for a week. The ambiance creates a different urgency and makes it feel bigger, because it is. Also, personally, the week is a great avenue to collect off-the-record information from friends and colleagues around the league. I always look forward to that aspect.

How important do you think the week of shows on radio row are to your audience? 

McKee: We’ve been lucky because the Broncos have actually played in a couple of recent Super Bowls and won one of them. Our ratings during that time period went through the roof. However, when the Broncos lost in dramatic fashion to the Ravens a few years ago and we still went to New Orleans AND then the Ravens WON the Super Bowl, we had our lowest ratings dip in years! Our listeners just didn’t want to hear anything because the loss stung so much. We probably would’ve been better off not going that year! I think the audience wants to live vicariously through you but they don’t want you to rub it in their face. It’s a weird balance. At this point, our audience just expects us to be there so being there isn’t really a big deal but not being there would raise questions. It’s a bit of a no win situation. That being said, your team going to and winning the super bowl is ratings gold for a long long time! You better be there because those stories and that experience lasts forever.

Kaplan: When I listen, I love the background noise, the buzz, it sounds so alive! As a listener, I want to be there! If you track engagement on social platforms, we provide so much more content and create so much more activity by being live on radio row. That’s how I measure it.

Dawson: I don’t think it’s important to them in a conscious way. I think we benefit from a credibility standpoint of the audience knowing that we’re on top of things and committing resources to make sure they’re informed and entertained. I think what they value most are the words being said by particular people when they tune in. Our being there doesn’t provide much of an advantage in creating compelling content. Factor in the disruption to the clock, unpredictably mediocre guests, and general chaos, and there are pros and cons to the conversation.

Innes: My audience only cares about being entertained. I can do a good show whether I’m on radio row or Mars.

Dougherty: We get tremendous feedback from our listeners through social media channels when we broadcast from special event settings like radio row at the Super Bowl. We see the same engagement when USAA brings us on the road to broadcast prior to the Army-Navy game.

Tierney: I’m sure on some level we tend to overrate that aspect of it, but it is a core belief of mine that if you have a successful show, the expectation from listeners is that during the biggest week of the year, you will be right in the middle of it.

What do you do to make sure your program stays consistent and doesn’t get overtaken by guests/advertiser pitches?

McKee: There is almost no escape from that! You do your best but it’s almost unavoidable. One thing you can do is record segments ahead of time. Other than that, you are a bit screwed. It’s a good rule of thumb to do every show on the road the same way you would do it in the studio but that’s easier said than done. Try and treat the day on the road schedule wise same as at home.

Kaplan: We don’t obsess over the guests any longer. I used to consider the best guests the metric for success. Now I think more about all forms of media at my disposal. So it’s not just what A-list guests I can get on the air but rather how can I engage my audience on and off the air?

Dawson: We do our best to keep a similar show going but here’s the funny thing. In order to get an A-list guest you have to take others from their stable quite often. We have 3 segments an hour and scheduling into that without disruption is not possible.

Innes: It’s difficult because you are at the mercy of the celebrities. They may show up a minute before break time. What do you do? In that case, you blow up the clock. Then you end up with 5 minutes of Franco Harris peddling an insurance company with his handler starting a countdown 2 minutes in.

Dougherty: We make it a point to re-set our show at the top of the hour with the day’s top headlines and keep a watchful eye on what is happening in our local market. As much fun as the week on radio row is, local comes first.

Tierney: We don’t allow that to happen. It’s our show and Tiki and I both recognize that while good guests can enhance our show, we will not change the DNA of what we do. You still need time to let things breathe, to react to stories outside of the NFL, to react to interviews we just conducted, and to deliver built-in sponsored segments just as we would if we were back in studio. We also have great synergy with our producer, so we’re all on the same page. As far as advertiser pitches are concerned, you have to maintain control of the car. I’m driving the show, not the guest. If you’re not alert, it’s very easy for a 7-8 minute spot to be overtaken by product push, which equates to a painfully boring interview. Trust your internal clock, like a QB. If you’re getting bored, the audience has either left or is on the brink of leaving. If you allow that to happen, as a host, that’s on you. Be better at your job.

What’s one thing that you do during the week that’s unique from the other 50-100 stations on radio row?

McKee: I participate in the actual press opportunities! I always try and get a question in to the commissioner. I ask questions of the coaches. I go to stuff and ask questions. Mostly that’s the realm of the print media. I have been amazed over the years of the laziness of most talk show hosts. Get out there. Participate. It’s great to say on the air, “ I asked Goodell this question”. “ I asked Bill Belichick this” stuff like that. I promise you I’ve done more stuff like that than ANY talk show host in America over the years. It has been a huge separator and gives us unique content.

Kaplan: My approach is to deliver a show which matters to my market. I look for local ties. For example, we have enlisted a player from the Patriots and the Eagles, both from San Diego, to be our weekly reporters. The goal is to talk to our home market, from an international event. That helps us form a stronger local connection.

Dawson: One fun thing that we do is create a compliment contest throughout the week that our guests are not aware of. It’s awesome because it butters them up and gets the positive energy flowing. It may even deliver a few horizontal tune ins. We produce an audio compli-montage at the end of the week along with a King of Compliments for the year and this adds to the fun.

Innes: We have a wireless mic and roam around. We had my producer dressed as Mike Ditka and he would sit down with random radio shows, while they were on air. He would then talk back to me via wireless. One guy wanted to fight him. My producer wore an “Assweiler” garbage can around the Houston radio row. That made national news. I think the wireless mic adds a lot. It allows for constant content during slow times.

Dougherty: Our focus is on doing the best job we can to put our audience in the room. We do that on air and through the use of our social media platforms. It isn’t about being unique as much as it is delivering quality content that satisfies our listeners.

Tierney: The most obvious difference is that we deliver a TV presence with a national simulcast. We bring you a visual. You get to see what we see. There’s great value in that.

If you owned your radio station or a local business and a team from your city was not playing in the game, would you spend the $ to be part of this week of shows?

McKee: My advice would be to send as many people as makes sense for your budget. Don’t stretch but don’t be cheap. Keep in mind that the more people you send from the station the more crazy stories that can come from it. Hopefully you have a good crew that likes hanging out. Bonding wise it’s fantastic. Great memories for years and years. Monday night is now media night. Tuesday is the media party. We have established Wednesday as our staff dinner. It’s been my favorite tradition year after year. Whatever you do if you send a group don’t skimp on the staff dinner. It’s what connects you with one another. Thursday night, all of our ex NFL guys have Super Bowl rings. Mark Schlereth, Brandon Stokely and Alfred Williams, which means they wear their suits and rings and go to parties that the rest of us nerds can’t get into! Friday night we basically leave open. If you do Super Bowl week the right way it will translate to the audience. But know this, if you don’t make an effort at all, you aren’t a real sports talk station.

Kaplan: Well, we are no longer an NFL market in San Diego, but our signal reaches LA and many LA sports fans have found us over the course of the three year relocation drama. I think radio row can be a very sell-able product to sponsors if packaged creatively.

Dawson: Absolutely. I believe there’s great value in it.

Innes: Well, there are some factors at play. Is my competition going? What market am I in? Does my audience back home really care? I’ve seen plenty of data to show that my competition doesn’t see any tangible bump from being there. Basically, it’s a way to get a sponsor to pump a few bucks into the station. If a sponsor wants to add to the bottom line, that’s hard to say no to. I’d refrain from sending morning shows. Middays and afternoons have the best chance of excelling. I do think there is an opportunity to create web content that can be sold. Gavin Spittle did and has done a great job of monetizing the digital aspect of the week.

Dougherty: We’re fortunate to have a great sales staff which sells sponsorship’s to off-set the costs of taking two shows on the road to the Super Bowl city. That provides us with a great opportunity to deliver good content for our audience and attach our clients to the station’s Super Bowl coverage. There’s a lot of value in being associated with the week.

Tierney: In all likelihood, yes, but it would hinge somewhat on the financial climate of the industry and our own ability to monetize the week. If we were able to offset some of the costs, perceptually, I believe it is worth it. It also tends to galvanize talent and is a nice way to put the finishing touch on a 5 month grind. I find that it boosts morale, and it’s fun! Who the hell doesn’t like to have fun? If it’s done right, it can be GREAT.

TV and Radio Are Heading in Opposite Directions

0

Remember newspapers?

For those that are too young to remember, we used to get these rolled up bundles of information delivered to our homes or offices. The product was filled with new information and a bunch of advertisements from a lot of the top spenders in town – especially those auto dealers (after all, Grandpa advertised in the newspaper, so dad surely did as well!).

Some of us would, religiously, read it first thing in the morning before leaving the house. Most of us had our favorite parts we would go right to and read first, and I remember on more than once occasion getting yelled at for leaving the whole paper on the kitchen table, except for the sports section which could be found in my room.

Last week, I saw something on a driveway that resembled a newspaper, although it looked more like a leaflet, and there were actual rocks in the rolled-up bag, presumably from keeping it from blowing away in the wind. After all, it was much too thin to stay in place by itself. When I opened it up, I still saw some information, most of which I had read about the day before, but hardly any advertising was present, except for the large color ad for a hearing loss center on the back of the sports “section.”

I bring this up because I am wanting those in our industry to go back to the time when advertising still went on in newspapers, but everyone under the age of 65 knew that it was headed in the wrong direction. We all knew that print would soon no longer be a viable advertising option.

If you think back to that time, you will remember an all-out assault from every different direction –  television, cable, radio, and any other form of advertising all went after the newspaper. If you talked to someone who sold any form of advertising besides print, the subject of the decline of newspaper was likely to come up. The advertisers heard it from every angle possible and it wasn’t long before print advertisers started running for the hills.

Now, fast forward to today. While not quite as dramatic as the decline of newspaper advertising, a new reality is happening – television and cable aren’t reaching anywhere near the same amounts of people and the cost of running ads is going up. Report after report is coming out on the decline of the television audience while the reach of radio remains consistent and strong.

The question to me is, why isn’t the message getting to the advertisers as fast as it did with the decline of print? The answer seems to be that radio is now left out on its own island. Whereas radio had its counterparts in television and cable to help tell the newspaper decline story, radio is now left alone to tell the story of televisions great decline.

So, it’s our job to tell the story. It’s our job to make sure that no matter if we are going directly after television dollars or not, the advertiser hears about the decline of television and the continued success of radio. Radio is providing a significantly better return on investment (more than double television), and this is something every advertiser and every ad agency needs to hear over and over again.

We have to be committed to making sure that the facts that are out there are repeated – radio is America’s number one reach medium, 93% of America is listening to the radio (that’s 271 million people weekly), and adults are listening to more than thirteen hours of radio each week.

Those of us in radio need to be the ones telling the story and we should be shouting it from the mountain tops. If we don’t tell the story, who will? It certainly isn’t something that you’ll read about in the newspaper, if in fact yours hasn’t already blown away.