Home Blog Page 69

Bleav Podcast Network Adds The Linda Cohn Show

0

Linda Cohn is bringing her new digital show to the Bleav podcast network. The longtime ESPN anchor will now expand her YouTube show to audio platforms.

What We Know: Cohn spent 34 years as an ESPN anchor, most notably on SportsCenter. In July, she launched an independent show on YouTube. Since then, she has gained more than 36,000 subscribers in just over two months. Now, the Bleav partnership will extend the show to Apple, Spotify, and other audio formats.

What They Said: Linda Cohn (via Front Office Sports): “With a network like that, I’m able to grow with leaps and bounds, and I plan to because I am all in on this because I’m just so excited about it. If I wasn’t getting the feedback that I have been from the people that have subscribed to my channel and from people on social media, [who are commenting], ‘This is great what you’re saying…’ then I would have thought twice about it.”

Linda Cohn (via Barrett Media In August): “This is something I want to build on as something I’ve created from the ground up… People are very busy, but they still want to hear what I have to say. Just like I was a part of their lives growing up watching on SportsCenter, they have welcomed me into their homes in this next chapter in the same way. That’s very gratifying to me.”

What Remains Unclear: However, neither Cohn nor Bleav disclosed financial terms of the partnership. If the partnership spins added elements for Cohn is also unknown.

What It Means: Ultimately, Cohn’s move highlights a growing path for former network talent. Instead of simply delivering the news, she now offers opinions on topics like the WNBA and ESPN layoffs and earning her own digital audience. Meanwhile, Bleav gains a recognizable voice with a built-in YouTube audience. As a result, Cohn’s second act away from ESPN now continues to grow in reach and scale.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Key Networks Expands Role With Ashley & Brad Show

0

Skidtrax is deepening its partnership with Key Networks. The Ashley & Brad Show now gets affiliate sales support, too.

What We Know: Key Networks already handled network sales for the syndicated show. Now, the company will also manage affiliate sales support. Meanwhile, the program keeps adding stations. Most recently, O-Town Communications’ Oldies 1480 KLEE and 107.7 FM joined the lineup in Ottumwa, Iowa.

What They Said: Skidtrax co-founders Michael Raffety and Tonya Campos framed the move as a natural next step. “When you find a partner who believes in the Ashley and Brad show as much as we do, you don’t just renew the relationship — you expand it,” they said. In addition, they noted, “We’re thrilled to have their team even more involved as we continue building our national lineup.”

What Remains Unclear: Neither company disclosed financial terms of the expanded agreement. Likewise, the announcement did not reveal how many stations currently carry the show. Additionally, it remains unclear which markets Key Networks will target first.

What It Means: Ultimately, one partner now handles both sides of the show’s sales business. As a result, Skidtrax can focus on content while Key Networks chases growth. Key Networks CEO Dennis Green said the goal is to “bring their unique talent to more markets across the country.” He added that the show offers “tremendous flexibility, with the ability to air in multiple formats while seamlessly integrating into the local markets that carry the show.”

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Zeb Norris Named Program Director at 99.9 KTYD Santa Barbara

0

Zeb Norris is back where his radio career began. Point Broadcasting has named him Program Director and morning host of Classic Rock 99.9 KTYD Santa Barbara.

What We Know Norris joined 99.9 KTYD in March, co-hosting mornings alongside Lin Aubuchon. After Aubuchon retired at the end of July, he took over the show. Before that, he spent two decades in Vermont, programming Classic Hits 101.7 WCVT Stowe/Burlington for six years and AAA network The Point WNCS Montpelier for fourteen. His résumé also includes Rockers KZAP Sacramento, KSJO San Jose, and KRQR San Francisco, plus AAAs WXLE Albany and KUMT Salt Lake City.

What They Said Norris called his journey back “the proverbial long, strange trip” and said he “couldn’t be happier to return home to KTYD.” Additionally, he noted that he has “kept an ear on the station” over the years. He also credited Aubuchon, saying she “left things in great shape, so it’s onward!” Finally, he thanked Point Broadcasting COO Brian Davis and CFO Lisa Felix “for this fantastic opportunity.”

What Remains Unclear Point Broadcasting has not said whether Norris will add a new morning co-host. Likewise, the company hasn’t outlined any programming changes under his leadership. Meanwhile, it remains to be seen how he’ll put his own stamp on the heritage brand.

What It Means For 99.9 KTYD, the move delivers continuity and deep local roots. Norris first joined the station in 1976 as its overnight host, so he knows its history firsthand. Moreover, his blend of Classic Rock and AAA experience fits the station well. Ultimately, it’s a full-circle homecoming, and radio could use more stories like it.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Did Graham Bensinger Cross a Line With His Mike Macdonald Interview Release

0

Graham Bensinger has interviewed some of the highest-profile people in sports and sports media. From Stephen A. Smith to Shaquille O’Neal, Bensinger’s work offers rare, long-form interviews and behind-the-scenes looks at some of the biggest names in sports. His latest sit-down is getting plenty of attention, but not exactly for all the right reasons.

In his exclusive, nearly two-hour sit-down with Super Bowl-winning head coach Mike Macdonald, there was a portion of the conversation that didn’t make the final edit for YouTube. However, it did make its way to social media, causing a firestorm of reaction online about the ethics of journalism. There are many ways to look at the moment. But mostly, it serves as a reminder that everything is on the record unless both sides agree otherwise.

While I’ve never worked in television, I have been in radio for nearly two decades. I’ve had the pleasure of spending time with thousands of personalities, talent and executives. Every time there’s a conversation, I state when the recording has started and when it has ended.

It’s not the law, but it’s a courtesy. Informing the interview subject that everything said is now being recorded and is on the record unless otherwise stated establishes clear expectations. I’ve always honored that principle. Not because I learned it in school, but because I’ve learned through experience that it’s always best to develop trust and relationships when you’re as transparent as you hope the subject will be.

That’s why those judging Bensinger’s ethics based solely on the release of the clip are misguided.

I Have Questions

In the clip, there’s no indication that the conversation was being recorded. There’s also no indication that it wasn’t. There’s also no disclaimer from either Macdonald or Bensinger indicating that the story he shared was off the record. In my short time working in television, one thing I do know is that once you sit in the chair, the cameras are rolling.

If the cameras are rolling, it’s at the editor’s discretion what gets included in the final product. If there are no disclaimers about what is on or off the record, the editor has a full canvas to paint.

According to reporting, the clip of Macdonald discussing his use of videos from Twitter was not included in the final YouTube product. That’s the bigger question to be asked.

Not whether the content was meant for public consumption, but if it was important enough to post after the release of the full-length final product, why wasn’t it included in the original interview?

The other question that needs to be asked is whether someone from the Seattle Seahawks’ communications team was present in the room. If so, why didn’t they speak up when the discussion was taking place?

If the interview with Bensinger was arranged solely through the head coach or his agent, then the Seahawks don’t have much ground to stand on. They can’t say the commentary wasn’t meant for public consumption if no one representing the organization was present to establish that boundary.

Actions Have Consequences

Now, the fallout.

The Seattle Seahawks likely won’t grant Bensinger any additional access. Then again, does he need it? Probably not. But will other NFL teams and personnel follow suit? You can assume some will because of the attention this clip received.

Will it affect the guest roster Bensinger gets in other aspects of media and entertainment? It depends. His sit-downs are designed around storytelling and sharing the journey of the subject. Not everyone will shy away from Bensinger’s digital following or the distribution he has with networks around the country.

You can also bet that Mike Macdonald will look inward at this situation as well. So will every athlete, coach and executive who sees what happened. Words have consequences. It doesn’t matter if it’s public or not.

Just Say It

Yes, off-the-record portions of conversations happen all the time. They will continue to happen every day. But unless something is explicitly stated to be off the record, everyone involved should assume the conversation is on the record. Especially in the setting Macdonald and Bensinger were in.

The lesson here isn’t that everything said in an interview should automatically become content. It’s that everyone involved needs to understand the rules before the first question is asked.

If something is off the record, say it. If something is not meant for public consumption, make that clear. And if you’re the person being interviewed, don’t assume a camera that’s rolling suddenly stops recording because the conversation feels informal.

Trust is the foundation of any good interview. That trust doesn’t come from assuming what the other person meant. It comes from establishing expectations, communicating clearly and respecting the boundaries that were agreed upon.

The Bensinger-Macdonald situation will eventually fade from the social media cycle. The larger lesson shouldn’t. In an era when every conversation can become content, there should be no gray area when it comes to what is and isn’t on the record.

If you want something to remain private, say so. Otherwise, once the microphones are on and the cameras are rolling, everyone should understand the rules.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

AM Radio Is on Life Support, and the FCC Helped Put It There

2

Hey, we did it. We destroyed one of the radio bands. The AM band is on life support, and it was caused by an industry’s hubris and the FCC. I love AM radio. I grew up slowly trying to tune in to radio stations from all over the world. Many of the players who created our predicament are gone, and we can now pick up the pieces and perhaps perform a rescue.

Early in radio’s existence, the federal government realized that radio could reach a large number of Americans instantly, which was so important in a national emergency. Radio stations were set up on clear channels that would cover most of the USA.

It was a revolution during a time when many Americans did not have a telephone yet, and even a newspaper was tough to get if you lived in a rural area. In 1939, more than 54,000 horse-drawn vehicles were still being produced. The cities had largely transitioned to cars, trucks, buses, and trains. These clear-channel stations were essential for a country that was slowly growing. These big stations were necessary.

A Potential Solution?

As time went on, communities grew all over the USA and eventually received their own radio stations. These AM stations frequently had to protect the 50,000-watt giants, even though these small stations were mandated to serve and inform the public. In fact, these small AM stations were the only lifeline for severe weather, community emergencies, and other problems.

If that market’s AM station had to turn down the power, so be it. Before anyone corrects me, yes, I know that a station could power up after sundown for big emergencies if it didn’t play commercials. But if a town’s radio station could not be heard 99% of the time after dark in its own community, even though the person trying to listen lived 10 miles from the town square, that created a lack of consistency. But here we are.

Here was the solution, but the owners of those 50k AM stations hated this idea: allow all AM stations to run the same array we use by day, just with less power. It would have been very helpful.

I have programmed and worked at 50k giants. What is the advantage of having someone hear the station five states away? It’s an ego play that didn’t fit into any business plan for a radio station. Depending on the situation, some of those 50k bruisers could have cut power at night and still covered their metros.

AM radio has interference issues. Well, yes, it does. Losing signal going under a bridge is a pain. But SiriusXM experiences the same thing, and no one complains about that. Sometimes cell phone coverage is lost under bridges or in big cities. Cell phones seem to be doing ok.

AM Radio’s Content Problem

AM radio, sadly, has a content problem. There are a lot of good reasons. The connected car has more options than you can count. That is great for the consumer, but AM radio has become the home of niche programming. Religious, foreign-language and brokered stations, along with other options on AM radio, do not create a reason to go there. Especially in spoken-word formats, there are really just two other options: news/talk and sports talk.

Many of those stations are now on FM. AM’s demise is connected to terrible content. Can AM rise again? It’s all about content.

By the way, both news/talk and sports talk formats have cume challenges. Is this an AM radio issue? No. Those same cume challenges are being experienced on spoken-word formats on FM as well. Okay, I have theories for both formats. I will share those in future columns.

What It Will Take to Rescue AM

The challenges for AM are immense. The companies that own the signals face serious fiscal realities that hinder format development and the patience to wait for it to work. I think looking at options to develop formats is key not only for AM but also for FM.

The challenge for radio’s long-term success must be about content. Information is not content and is no longer a rare commodity. You can grab your phone to find information at any time. Music radio has the same issues with Spotify and Amazon Music. Where is the unique content?

Modernizing AM also begins with a realistic way to improve market coverage of signals throughout the USA. If an AM station is in a market, people should be able to hear that station 24/7. The idea of protecting a station 700 miles away is ridiculous and counterproductive. To be fair, this should have been done 30 years ago.

Is it too late? Probably not. We now have 20-year-old humans purchasing record players and buying brand-new vinyl records. AM radio is vital, and the future ideas will come from amazing people like you. You will be the future.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Warren Kurtzman of Coleman Insights Wants Radio to Prove Its Brand-Building Power

0

After four decades in radio research, the Coleman Insights president believes radio still works. Now he’s focused on helping the industry prove it. Warren Kurtzman has spent most of his life studying how people listen to radio. These days, he’s just as focused on what happens after they hear the ad.

That focus sits at the center of Validate, the attribution platform Coleman Insights now represents worldwide. For an industry that watched Google and Meta win the measurement war, Kurtzman believes it could be a turning point.

A Radio Geek From the Start

“I’ve been with Coleman Insights for 31 years,” Kurtzman said. “I’ve been president of the company since 2008, so 18 years leading the company that Jon Coleman founded.”

Before that, he worked in research for Kurt Hanson, running his AccuRatings service. He started his research career with six years at Arbitron.

His roots go back even further. “I’ve just been a radio geek most of my life. I used to be on air. I used to run a radio station when I was at Cornell,” he said. “So I’ve been in the radio industry for about 40 years now.”

Known Before You’re Needed

Kurtzman doesn’t ignore radio’s headwinds. Still, his core belief hasn’t changed.

“Despite all the challenges that radio faces, including declining audience, more competition from other sources of audio and other sources of content that consumers can spend their time with, a really well executed radio campaign still delivers results for advertisers,” he said. “And does so very efficiently, especially if radio is used the right way, which is as a long-term brand-building tool.”

He often borrows a line from longtime friend and former Arbitron colleague Pierre Bouvard of Westwood One.

“Pierre always says to me, ‘You need to be known before you’re needed,’ and I use that line all the time,” Kurtzman said. “I think what radio is really great at is implanting local brands in consumers’ minds, so that when it comes time for them to make a purchase or use a service in a particular product category, they will go to the names and brands that they have been hearing about on the radio for years.”

The catch? “Radio needs a really good way to demonstrate that,” he said.

The Attribution Gap

Today’s advertisers live and die by ROAS, or return on ad spend. Google and Meta can show a client exactly what every dollar did, often in real time. Radio, for years, couldn’t. As a result, the dollars followed the data.

Kurtzman heard the same frustration from the top. We spoke while he was in Cleveland for the semiannual RAB board meeting. Fittingly, it all started at one of those meetings about two and a half years ago in Nashville.

“All I kept hearing about from these heads of radio groups or these executives at radio groups was, we need something that more effectively demonstrates the impact that we have for advertisers,” he recalled.

Weeks later, at Radiodays North America, he met with Pattison Media. The company owns about 75 stations in markets like Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, and Winnipeg. “They are not one of the biggest groups, but they’re a significant player, mostly in Western Canada,” he said.

Validate

Pattison had built its own attribution tool, called Validate. “When I saw the methodology that fueled it, I immediately called a couple of clients of ours,” Kurtzman said. “I said, after coming to the RAB board meeting and seeing the demand for this thing, I have now seen the answer to it, and it’s called Validate.”

Coleman Insights became Validate’s exclusive U.S. representative. Jeff Warshaw at Connoisseur Media and Rob Babin at Cox Media Group were early advocates and clients, and the RAB provided a lot of support. A few weeks ago, Coleman announced a new deal to represent Validate worldwide.

“I think it’s really a great solution for the challenge that radio has faced, which is we need a tool that shows how over-the-air broadcast spots can influence consumer behavior,” he said. “For the first time, radio can be looked at like other media are looked at, where advertisers can look at a dashboard and see the influence that their radio campaigns are having in real time, and that’s tremendous.”

How Validate Works

“Validate connects directly with the radio station’s traffic system,” Kurtzman explained. “So we have information about every spot that airs, and it also connects with the station’s streaming platform.”

From there, an algorithm fueled mostly by Nielsen PPM data estimates the broadcast audience. For example, say 1,000 people are streaming a station at 8:03 on a Monday morning. If streaming makes up 10% of listening at that hour, the math follows. “What we would then estimate is that 10,000 people heard that spot across broadcast and streaming,” he said.

However, impressions are only half the story. “The more exciting part about Validate is that we also provide the advertiser with what we call a conversion tag,” he said. “It’s a simple line of code that they can put in the header of their website.”

The tag tracks people exposed to the campaign on the station stream “and whether or not they go visit the advertiser’s website anytime while the campaign is running, and up to 90 days afterwards.”

What It Means?

Kurtzman is careful about what that means. “We’re not saying that people heard the spot, took out their phone, went straight to the website, and checked it out,” he said. “What we’re able to track is the influence that being exposed to that radio campaign has on driving traffic to the site.”

He used a familiar example. “Let’s say your air conditioning system breaks down, and you’re immediately like, ‘Oh, I need to get an HVAC company in here,'” he said. “You may do a Google search, or you may just plug it into ChatGPT and ask for recommendations for an HVAC company near me. The brands that come up, you’re going to go to the ones that you know because you’ve been exposed to their radio advertising and have a positive perception.”

Validate can also see what visitors do once they arrive. “Did they fill out a contact us form? Did they make a purchase? Did they download some exclusive content?” he said.

One credit union client rotates its creative among mortgages, car loans, and CDs. “What we’re able to actually see is when people are hearing a spot, let’s say, about mortgages, is that driving more traffic to the mortgage page on the credit union’s website?”

Brand Building, Not Just Clicks

Kurtzman draws a clear line between radio and digital. “When you buy a digital campaign, you are generally looking for almost instantaneous response. It’s a very tactical thing,” he said. “I’m not saying that radio can’t drive tactical behavior like that, but where radio is most effective, as I’ve said a couple of times, is this long-term brand building.”

And there’s more coming. “We do have plans to take this a lot further. We want to integrate it with foot traffic data,” he said. “But we’re taking it one step at a time.”

Growing, But Not Plug-and-Play

“We’ve got probably across the U.S. and Canada now about 250 radio stations on the Validate platform,” Kurtzman said. “I’d like to have 10 times that in the next couple of years.”

Cox and Connoisseur came first, and Hubbard Radio and Bonneville International have followed. Several public media stations are also on board.

Meanwhile, the pipeline is full. “We have discussed this with every one of the 10 largest radio groups in the United States,” he said. “Virtually every one of them has seen a demo of it, and nobody has said no yet.”

Still, he won’t oversell it. “I won’t tell you that every salesperson turns this thing on, completely understands it, takes it to clients, and is successful with it,” he said. “In fact, one of the things that’s interesting about Validate is we will not sell it to a radio station unless they commit to a year of usage, and the reason why is there is a ramp-up period.”

“I have sat in on a number of meetings with radio salespeople and their clients, looking at data and explaining to them what it means,” he added. “Ultimately, salespeople should be able to use this data relatively easily.”

Radio’s Two Perils

When I asked about the biggest danger facing radio, Kurtzman asked if he could give two.

The first one, he admitted, is familiar. “There are going to be Coleman Insights clients who may read what I say here and go, ‘Oh God, Warren’s saying that again,'” he said. “It is the lack of investment in external marketing of radio brands.”

“The industry stopped marketing our brands almost at the exact time that a huge array of new competitors entered the market,” he continued. “I’m old, but when I was growing up, everybody knew every radio station. Now people don’t know them as well.”

“While I don’t think that all of a sudden pouring money into marketing is going to reverse all of the industry’s challenges,” he said, “we are hamstringing ourselves by not investing in these brands.”

The Second

The second is programmatic. “There are so many dollars being spent on local advertising that radio doesn’t even have a chance at getting, and the reason why is most of that advertising is being bought programmatically,” he said.

“I can buy everything from display at the screens that sit on top of urinals in the sports stadium to ads that are going to run when I’m pumping gas, to digital audio, to over-the-top television,” he said. “I can’t buy broadcast radio that way.”

That’s why Coleman and Pattison plan to launch Resonate, a programmatic platform for broadcast radio, in the next couple of months.

“A lot of radio broadcasters have been fearful of the word programmatic, because they think it represents a race to the bottom in terms of rates, and it doesn’t have to be,” he said. “If you’re a 30-year-old media buyer, you’re not going to Kansas City and calling each of the major groups and getting their rate proposals when you can go buy something else with a couple of clicks.”

Importantly, he’s not writing off the local seller. “There is still absolutely a place for the traditional radio local seller, local advertiser relationship. That’s not going away,” he said. “But we can supplement all the income from that with programmatic selling.”

“It’s not that those advertisers think poorly of radio; they don’t,” he added. “It’s just that we’re not in the platforms that these media buyers are using to place local advertising.”

What It Means

I’ve long believed streaming is radio’s most undervalued asset. Kurtzman agrees it matters, but he also sees why over-the-air measurement is the real breakthrough.

“Doing attribution for digital is easy,” he said. “But doing attribution for over the air is really hard because it’s analog. Validate actually has come up with a way that allows us to do attribution for over the air.”

That matters because the broadcast signal still does most of the heavy lifting. “According to the latest data from Edison Share of Ear studies, over the air still accounts for more than 85% of all radio listening,” he said. “We need to get value for that in addition to the value we’re getting for our digital streaming.”

Radio didn’t lose ground to digital because it stopped working. It lost ground because it couldn’t show its work. With Validate and Resonate, Kurtzman is betting radio can finally speak the language buyers use today. After 40 years in the business, he sounds as energized as ever to help it happen.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

How Matt Chernoff Evolves From One Legendary Chapter to the Next at 680 the Fan

0

Twenty-five years is a long time for any sports radio personality to command the airwaves in a single market. When it happens with a duo, it defines a legacy. Earlier this summer, 680 The Fan announced that changes were coming to afternoon drive and the Chuck & Chernoff show. After twenty-five years together, including the last eighteen on The Fan, Matt Chernoff and Chuck Oliver would be ending their radio program together.

“To do it in my hometown is what meant the most to me,” said Chernoff about closing the chapter on Chuck & Chernoff. “Chuck and I both being born here, that’s what separated us from everyone else. We spoke the language of everyone listening. The run is important, but to do it in your hometown makes it extra special.”

The Secret Sauce

Chuck & Chernoff first worked together in the early 2000s at AM 790 The Zone before moving to 680 The Fan in 2008. It was there that Chuck and Chernoff established themselves as a top sports talk show in Atlanta in the afternoon drive timeslot, where they resided for much of their tenure.

However, a week after signing multi-year extensions to remain with the radio station, change was in the air. Chuck Oliver announced he would depart the program but continue to host his evening program on the radio station. The response from loyal listeners was immediate.

“It was a little overwhelming to realize that at one point our show touched them at some point over the years. That was the coolest thing ever,” explained Chernoff. “It wasn’t adding up in my head. Because when you’re doing the show, it’s like any other line of work. Then the years just add up. Then you get to the end, and you realize the generations that just wanted to hang out. That’s the greatest compliment ever.”

Chernoff says the chemistry clicked early between himself and Oliver. They quickly learned each other’s tells, delivery and personalities. Chernoff said he never felt like he had to fight for microphone time, instead comparing their execution to a dance.

A month after Oliver’s announcement, the program bid its final farewell. The show featured some of Atlanta’s top sports icons and frequent guests, keeping the focus on honoring the program’s legacy while also enjoying a laugh along the way.

“We have a line. Our show was football and funny. Football ninety percent of the time, and hopefully the other ten percent was funny and gave people a laugh,” said Chernoff. “We’re lucky we had a chance to close up shop like we did. That doesn’t happen too often in this business. I’m so proud of the show. It wasn’t perfect, but it was something you could step back and see how rare it was.”

A Familiar Face Returns

At the end of August, Chernoff welcomed a new voice to afternoons on The Fan, but an all-too-familiar face to the radio station. John Kincade rejoined the station six years after departing for an opportunity in mornings at 97.5 The Fanatic in his hometown of Philadelphia. The pairing was “super comfortable” for Chernoff as he entered his second act in afternoon drive.

“John and I have known each other for a million years. When we knew that was going to be the decision, John and I jumped on the phone. He’s so easy to work with,” said Chernoff. “As soon as it was presented to me, I knew this would be great. He’s never shy with an opinion and as pro as it gets.”

Chernoff didn’t have any reservations about the decision, which he admitted was stunning to some when the news became public in early August. However, he now had a co-host who could focus solely on growing the afternoon program instead of attempting to balance two shows, as Oliver had successfully done for so many years.

“Nothing against Chuck [Oliver] at all. I couldn’t do two shows as successfully as he did for that long,” noted Chernoff. “When we first started talking about the show, he said he was going to follow my lead. To me, that meant a lot. When presented on his end, he had a lot of trust in me to guide things until he got back into it. It didn’t take long to get comfortable.”

Change is never easy. After twenty-five years of a proven product, it’s not just the talent adjusting to a new environment. It’s also the longtime listeners of 680 The Fan adjusting to new expectations after Chuck & Chernoff delivered a familiar afternoon routine for so many years.

For Chernoff, the program with Kincade represents a fresh beginning. He can build on the foundation established through his work with Chuck Oliver while adding a fresh coat of paint with a new yet familiar voice in afternoons.

“We don’t do well with change in general. There’s going to be people who are hesitant because Chuck & Chernoff was part of their routine. But I sincerely hope that they give it a chance if they’re on the fence,” said Chernoff. “I’ve always taken pride in the fact that I can work with different people. I don’t want this show to sound like Chuck & Chernoff because that chapter is closed. I don’t want to do the same kind of show working with a different partner.”

A Second Act

A second chapter is a rarity in sports radio. Chernoff says he understands the unique opportunity he’s been given when so many of his peers across the country aren’t allowed to try. That’s the driving force behind his motivation to build Kincade & Chernoff and reach the heights of his previous program.

“I’m fortunate to build a second show. I talk to so many people and they ask how long I want to do this. As long as I can because I love doing this,” explained Chernoff. “If it works like I think it could work for a second time, that would be the biggest feather in the cap to do it a second time around.”

That opportunity requires trust and investment from the executives who oversee 680 The Fan. Dickey Broadcasting, which owns 680 The Fan, has been based in Atlanta for nearly 35 years, operating three radio stations and three regional sports networks.

Chernoff considers the opportunity to work for Dickey Broadcasting a blessing. He says the company’s continued investment is the biggest key to navigating future success in an evolving content ecosystem.

“Anyone who works in this industry knows what is going on. Working for this company, there’s still such an investment in radio. Nothing makes me more proud than that. We invest the way we do as an independent radio station in an era of downsizing or shifting to some sort of AI to avoid costs,” said Chernoff. “That’s what separates us in the industry. There’s an obvious mission to make sure radio has its proper place and investing to back it up.”

For twenty-five years, Matt Chernoff and Chuck Oliver gave Atlanta sports fans a place to spend their afternoons. The voices may have changed, but the connection to the audience is what Chernoff believes matters most.

The end of Chuck & Chernoff closed one of the longest-running chapters in Atlanta sports radio. Now, Chernoff has the opportunity to write another one.

There are no guarantees that Kincade & Chernoff will reach the same heights. Building that kind of chemistry takes time, and no second act can simply recreate what made the first one special. Chernoff understands that. He also understands that the opportunity itself is rare.

After a quarter-century behind the microphone, he could have looked back at what he and Oliver accomplished and considered the story complete. Instead, he chose to look forward.

For Chernoff, the goal isn’t to replace Chuck & Chernoff. It’s to create something that eventually stands on its own.

And if the first twenty-five years taught him anything, it’s that the best radio relationships aren’t built overnight. They’re built one conversation, one laugh and one listener at a time.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Is Syndication Making Radio Better or Just Cheaper?

0

Here’s a question every programmer and market manager should ask before signing a syndication deal: Is this going to make the station better, or just cheaper to run?

Let me get this out of the way. This isn’t one of those anti-syndication columns. I’ve carried syndicated shows, and some of them were flat-out better than anything we could have built locally. And being local has never made anybody funny. But radio’s connection to the community is still one of the biggest advantages we’ve got. So maybe the question isn’t local versus syndicated. Maybe it’s how you get great content on the air without cutting the cord to the community.

Radio loves to say “live and local.” Great. But is it good?

Putting somebody in a studio down the street doesn’t make them compelling. You can market a mediocre local show all day long. Slap the talent on billboards. Send them to every festival. Wrap their faces around the station van and have them shaking hands every weekend.

None of it matters if the show isn’t good when somebody turns on the radio. Great content is the price of admission. And that’s a legitimate argument for syndication.

Johnjay & Rich at Z100 Portland

I’ve been on the other side of this. When I was VP of Programming for the Portland market, Z100 carried Johnjay & Rich.

A lot of the credit goes to Justin Riley, Z100’s PD, and the programmers who came before him. They got it. Putting Johnjay & Rich on the air wasn’t the end of the programming decision. It was the beginning. We spent a ton of time making sure there was Portland in that show. Local content. Promotions. Imaging. Market knowledge. Constant conversation between the station and the show. The goal was to make sure Johnjay & Rich knew what was going on in Portland and felt like part of it.

We weren’t trying to make a syndicated show sound local. We were trying to make it matter locally. There’s a big difference.

The Woody Show Gets It

You can see a version of that today with The Woody Show.

Woody has made the point himself. Being local just for the sake of being local isn’t enough. It still has to be entertaining. He’s right.

But the show also gives affiliates plenty of room to make it their own. Look at 105.7 The Point in St. Louis. The station works hard at localizing the show, and Woody has history in that market. Now there’s the newer work-parts option, which lets affiliates run their own music around the show’s content.

Syndicated and local aren’t opposites. You can start with great national content and build local relevance around it.

Win at Home First

Most of the morning shows I’ve worked with over the years have told me, at one point or another, that they’d love to be syndicated. I understand why. Who doesn’t want more stations? My answer has always been the same. Win at home first. Then syndicate.

That means beating the competition down the street. It also means beating everything else fighting for your listeners’ attention. Streaming. Podcasts. Social media. The phone in their hand. If you can’t win that fight at home, you’re not ready for somebody else’s town.

Then there’s the fear of losing what made the show work locally in the first place. There are ways around that. Start with a sister station or two in nearby or similar markets. Keep the home station first. Build separate breaks for each affiliate. And keep somebody in each market feeding the show local content.

Take it one step at a time, and a show can grow without forgetting where it came from.

The Tourist Problem

Knowing about a market and belonging to a market are two different things.

A syndicated personality can say “Kansas City.” They can talk about the Chiefs. They can plug the big concert Saturday night. And they can cut customized liners all day long. That doesn’t mean they have a relationship with Kansas City.

Without the work around the show, they’re a tourist. They’ve seen the landmarks. They’ve picked up a few local references. Maybe they’ve even visited. Listeners figure it out. They can tell the difference between someone who mentions their town and someone who’s actually part of it. It’s on the station to build that bridge.

Save Money, Not Effort

Look, radio companies are businesses. There’s nothing wrong with being efficient. If syndication cuts costs and puts better talent on the air, everybody wins.

The trouble starts when the thinking becomes: We syndicated the morning show, so we don’t need all those people anymore. Programmers. Producers. Promotions. Street teams. Appearances. Marketing. Maybe syndication isn’t what costs radio its local connection. Maybe it’s gutting everything that used to surround the show.

Syndication can save money. It shouldn’t save effort.

Better or Just Cheaper?

So back to the question. If you’re swapping a mediocre local show for a phenomenal syndicated one, you may have made the station better. If you’re dumping a great local show because syndication costs less, that’s a whole different decision.

Both can be legitimate business calls. But they’re not the same call. Saving money is a business strategy. Let’s not pretend it’s a programming strategy.

The listener has no idea what the show costs. All they know is whether they like what’s coming out of the speakers. Local without great content isn’t enough. But great content without a connection leaves one of radio’s biggest advantages sitting on the table.

I saw it work with Johnjay & Rich at Z100. You can see it with The Woody Show. Radio doesn’t have to choose between great syndicated programming and local relevance. It just has to remember that localization takes actual work.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

How AI Misinformation Could Reshape the 2026 Midterm Elections and Media Coverage

0

Artificial intelligence is coming for you at the ballot box, and it is not just videos anymore. I’ve given up warning the world about AI because apparently The Matrix, the Terminator movies, and Ex Machina made technology wars look fun. (I mean, who doesn’t love a robot automatically going into a fighting stance and trying to battle you because you pushed it? And if an AI robot could do that for being pushed, imagine what your computer would do to you every time you slammed it closed out of frustration.)

Jokes aside, we need to take a serious look at reporting on AI during election season.

A local Long Island outlet had its first taste of what election seasons could look like for this year’s midterms and beyond, but it reported on it just a little too late.

The village of Garden City (located on Long Island, NY — and yes, grammar police, it is ON Long Island, not IN) holds its mayoral elections in March before national midterm elections. The village of roughly 25,000 people sees about one-third of its total population turn out for elections… and it is always a heated one.

Why the Building Matters

Garden City, like every posh and affluent suburb of New York City, has an old, dilapidated former boarding school building that will take hundreds of millions of dollars to save, which the village (with a AAA credit rating) does not have. But still, they throw their tax dollars at a building that is falling down and hope someone comes up with a solution to save it.

This has been going on since the village purchased the building in 1984. I have seen literal fistfights break out in local establishments because this is a local topic that gets so heated and evokes visceral emotions from people who want to knock it down or save it.

Every election, candidates offer their ideas for the building (it’s typically save it vs. knock it down), and then nothing gets done. The town is throwing millions of dollars every year to “save” a building that could have been saved 40 years ago, but now, sadly, it just can’t be.

Turn to this year’s election. The “knock it down” candidate was leading in the polls, hopefully bringing an end to this local debate. And then AI struck!

Enter AI

Days before the election, a fake website was made, along with AI videos claiming the “knock it down” candidates wanted to put affordable housing where this building is. This town might not be racist, but it is most definitely classist (racism’s cousin, which is more popular and common than we in the media like to admit).

The AI videos made people question, but the AI website with the candidates’ names and photos on it was a nail in the coffin for what could have been a very different election result.

The local newspaper (the Garden City News) did a very thorough job reporting on the AI scandal, posting photos and a screen recording of the website and getting comments from both sides of the political aisle, as well as from the AI creator who spread the false information.

However, the paper failed to report on it before the election — if you are interested, here is a link to the reporting.

The Broader Effect of AI in Elections

Now, I know this all sounds benign and like a whole bunch of local hoopla, so let’s distill it down to three points.

  1. AI was used in an election to lie to voters and garner votes for one political side.
  2. Media outlets failed to report on the use of AI until after the election. (Cue Trump voice: “We have no evidence of collusion at this time.”)
  3. People are questioning the election results and the legitimacy of the election. (Trump voice again: “It was a stolen election, totally stolen.”)

On a broader scale, this can have a massive effect on the future of elections. A new study from the Harvard Kennedy School predicts that 2028 “will mark the start of a seismic and generational shift in U.S. politics as campaigns fully embrace the rapidly escalating power of AI.”

What better testing ground for 2028 than this year’s midterm elections? Remember, it was only six short years ago that we saw a similar situation play out in 2020 with the Hunter Biden laptop. Except it was the truth, and the media LIED to the American public, calling it “fake” and “AI.”

How to Prepare as a Reporter

Fake AI, meet your evil twin: real AI. And it’s only getting started. So here is how to prepare to be the best reporter you can be in this “new news world,” where your reports are competing with AI that is infringing on your copyrighted material.

  • Verify information with real sources — PR people are your first defense. Sure, in the political world, campaign managers and communications directors are there to make their candidate look good, but if they are good at their job, they will always be honest ON BACKGROUND.
  • Use AI to detect AI — there are so many tools out there, and they are free. I hate AI, but for websites it’s ok
  • Be on guard — AI is getting more difficult to identify and more prevalent, so question everything.
  • Use discernment — yeah, I know being on guard and questioning everything is a synonym of discernment, but more specifically, I’m saying question your discernment. The last part of the scientific method, which they don’t teach third graders anymore, is to question the science. Find out if the results you have are replicable. If you are finding more and more legit photos of Hunter Biden doing cocaine off of a stripper’s body parts, it’s real. The laptop is not a lie… unlike the cake, which is not just a lie, it’s AI.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

FOX Sports Radio Adds Baltimore Affiliate With 1370AM

0

Baltimore has a new sports radio station on the dial. WCBM Maryland, Inc has launched FOX Sports 1370 AM (WQLL-AM) today.

What We Know: Effective immediately, the station carries FOX Sports Radio’s weekday lineup. LaVar Arrington, Brady Quinn and Jonas Knox open mornings with Two Pros and a Cup of Joe from 6-9 a.m. ET. Next, The Dan Patrick Show runs until noon, followed by The Herd with Colin Cowherd until 3 p.m. Afterward, Stugotz & Company LIVE and Covino & Rich carry listeners through 7 p.m. At launch, there is no plans for local programming as of yet.

What They Said: Andy Grimshaw, Market Manager for WQLL-AM: “Sports are woven into the fabric of Baltimore, and we’re excited to bring some of the biggest voices in sports broadcasting to our listeners. From the biggest stories and games to expert analysis and the latest in sports betting, FOX Sports 1370 AM will give Baltimore sports fans something to follow around the clock.”

What Remains Unclear: Meanwhile, the flip follows iHeartMedia’s June move of the Black Information Network to Radio One’s 1400 WWIN. However, any plans for local programming is unknown.

What It Means: Ultimately, Baltimore listeners gain another option for national sports talk. Additionally, the lineup brings recognizable names like Dan Patrick and Colin Cowherd to the market. As a result, FOX Sports Radio strengthens its presence in a passionate sports town. Still, the weekend schedule will shape how complete that offering becomes.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.