In the wake of the NFL acquiring a 10% equity stake in ESPN as part of a multi-layered partnership with the network, former MLB executive David Samson is sounding the alarm on what the deal could mean for the future of NFL media rights—and for how the league is covered by its new broadcast partner.
Speaking on his show Nothing Personal with David Samson, the former Marlins executive didn’t hold back when analyzing the implications of the landmark agreement, which still requires regulatory approval. Samson framed the move as one of the most significant business shakeups in sports in decades, warning it could blur the lines between journalism and business interests.
“Do you think ESPN is going to spend hours of programming each day criticizing the NFL, bringing Jerry Jones to task?” Samson asked rhetorically. “You talk about a conflict of interest—Why do you think Bob Iger had to talk about it yesterday?”
Samson argued the NFL’s partial ownership could influence ESPN’s editorial tone, depth of coverage, and even decisions around investigative journalism. Referencing prominent ESPN reporter Don Van Natta and Meadowlark Media contributor Pablo Torre, Samson suggested journalists known for deep reporting on league controversies might now face pushback or a chilling effect.
“If you’re Don [Van Natta], you don’t think you’re looking around and saying, ‘There used to be a relationship that concerned me, but at least it wasn’t in writing. Now there’s a relationship that is solidified pending regulatory approval,’” Samson said on how Van Natta may see this agreement. “There is no way that I will have the ability to do the investigative work that I do.”
The NFL’s media power is also growing on another front. Samson noted that the league is bringing four new games to market—reportedly fetching up to $70 million apiece from Netflix—which could bring in upwards of $250 million in fresh revenue. That, combined with upcoming renewals of its existing media rights deals, puts the NFL in a position of unmatched leverage.
Even with ESPN now a partial NFL property, Samson said the league could, in theory, walk away when current broadcast contracts expire. However, he predicted that’s unlikely.
“The NFL is going to have to re-up with ESPN because they are now partners,” he said. “But will ESPN get a different rate? Or will the NFL still charge them like they would Apple or Netflix where they don’t have an equity stake? That’s how business works.”
From a business standpoint, Samson sees the deal as a potential antitrust flashpoint, warning it could restrict competition and diminish consumer benefit.
“The government has stopped deals that smell like this before,” Samson said. “Do they have the guts to stop this agreement—or the pettiness to stop this agreement? It’s one of the greatest business wait and sees that we’ve seen in sports in the last quarter century.”
Whether regulators intervene or not, Samson said one thing is certain: the relationship between ESPN and the NFL has now moved “from unofficial to official,” and the impact will be felt across coverage, tone, and the business of sports media.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.
