CNN has no shortage of political voices, but when Scott Jennings and Leigh McGowan share the screen, something different happens.
The network suddenly feels less like a panel discussion and more like an event. That matters in a media environment where attention is the most valuable currency and the hardest thing to garner. Pairing these two more often would be a smart, intentional move rather than a happy accident.
Let’s start with the obvious. Scott Jennings is smug. That is not an insult. It is a defining on-air characteristic. Jennings projects confidence that borders on arrogance, and he does so unapologetically. He believes he is right, he arrives prepared, and he usually knows where the argument is headed before anyone else at the table figures it out. That combination is why CNN keeps going back to him.
Jennings also understands television. He does not just argue to win the point. He argues to control the moment. His timing is sharp, his delivery is polished, and his body language often signals that he is already a step ahead. For viewers who lean right, he is reassuring. For viewers who do not, he is frequently infuriating. Both reactions are valuable.
Enter Leigh McGowan. Every time she appears on CNN, it is hard to look away. She brings a similar certainty, but channels it through a very different lens. McGowan does not hedge. She does not soften her convictions to make them more palatable. She believes her arguments are superior, and she presents them with urgency and moral clarity.
When McGowan is matched with Jennings, the temperature changes instantly. The exchange feels less scripted and more combustible. Neither is there to play defense. Neither is interested in conceding an inch. They are aghast at each other’s worldview, and neither hides it particularly well. That tension is riveting television.
This is not about shouting matches or cheap theatrics. It is about contrast. CNN has spent years searching for ways to make its political programming feel urgent without feeling chaotic. Jennings and McGowan offer chaos, and I frankly want more of it. They exude similar confidence while standing on opposite sides of the ideological divide. The friction is authentic.
It also helps that both are skilled communicators. These are not unserious voices chasing viral moments. They come armed with facts, framing, and an understanding of how their arguments will land. The sparks fly because both know exactly what they are doing.
CNN should lean into this pairing. Not occasionally. Not as a novelty. Make it a feature. Viewers remember moments when television makes them feel something, and this is one of those rare combinations that consistently delivers.
I have said before that Scott Jennings feels like the part of CNN’s future. He understands the network, the format, and the role he plays within it. Now I want to see that future tested and sharpened alongside Leigh McGowan. Put them together more often and let the audience watch the clash.
In a crowded political media landscape, chemistry still matters. CNN has stumbled onto something that works. The smart move is not to overthink it, but to embrace it.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Garrett Searight is Barrett Media’s News Editor, which includes writing daily news stories, features, and opinion columns. He joined Barrett Media in 2022 after a decade leading several radio brands in several formats, as well as a 5-year stint working in local television. In addition to his work with Barrett Media, he is a radio and TV play-by-play broadcaster. Reach out to him at Garrett@BarrettMedia.com.



Crossfire 2026 maybe?
I hope not. I think there’s enough counter argument programming on. Even if it is usually three or 4 against one. Is Jon Stewart pointed out years ago, the The crossfire format brings us nothing but two people yelling at each other about how they are more right than the other.
I stumbled upon this article when I was looking for more information on the on screen conflict they had recently, which went viral on social media. This article is very well written.