Home Blog Page 122

Burning Man Struggles: Economic Uncertainty Crushes Ticket Demand

0

Burning Man’s 40th anniversary reveals a sobering reality. Tickets aren’t selling out anymore.

What We Know Resellers now offload inventory at steep losses rather than turn profits. Tickets on the resale market have dropped below $500—a sharp decline from the typical $1,000 attendees spend for a full desert experience. Meanwhile, organizers released bulk tickets at discounted prices to fill seats, further undercutting resellers. Additionally, Facebook exchange groups report historically low activity, signaling fewer people bought tickets in the first place.

What’s at Stake Burning Man’s operating budget depends on steady ticket revenue, yet costs haven’t stabilized. The organization now requests donations to cover financial shortfalls. Furthermore, if attendees grow accustomed to bargain prices this year, they’ll delay purchasing at full price next year—creating a dangerous cycle. This pattern threatens the festival’s long-term financial health and operational planning.

What Remains Unclear Will organizers implement price adjustments or scale down future events? Can they recover if ticket demand continues declining? Consequently, one attendee raised a critical question: “How does the org plan and finance everything?” Without clarity on strategy, uncertainty will persist among both fans and resellers heading into 2027.

What It Means Economic pressure has finally broken Burning Man’s ticket scarcity model. After years where demand far outpaced supply, organizers now face the uncomfortable opposite—inventory they can’t move. Most importantly, this shift suggests the festival must rethink its business model. Either prices stay low permanently, or the organization confronts an uncomfortable truth about its current market position.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

ESPN’s Removal Of The Bottomline May Have Exposed The More Hidden Distractions

0

For more than 30 years, ESPN has been telling sports fans to look at the bottom of the television screen. Now it wants us to stop.

Beginning this college football season, ESPN is eliminating its famous BottomLine during live games across ABC, ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNews, ACC Network and SEC Network. The endless crawl of scores, news and schedules that became almost as identifiable with ESPN as Chris Berman’s nicknames and the SportsCenter theme is disappearing from college football Saturdays.

I wonder if it’s also creating another reason for me to stare at my phone.

That’s the fascinating part of this decision. ESPN is essentially acknowledging that one of the most recognizable inventions in sports television has been replaced by the thing constantly in your hand.

Different Viewer Expectation

The BottomLine arrived in 1995, when it solved a problem. If you were watching Florida-Georgia and wanted to know what was happening in Michigan-Ohio State, you couldn’t grab your iPhone. Also, there was no iPhone. Moreover, you waited for ESPN to tell you.

The ticker was our sports internet before we really had a sports internet.

Visually, I’m with ESPN. Watch a major game without a crawl and then watch one with it. The difference is noticeable. The screen feels bigger and cleaner. The football game gets to be the football game instead of sharing space with Toledo 31, Bowling Green 17.

ESPN has already experimented with the approach during College Football Playoff games and other major events, including NBA and NHL postseason games. Now it’s extending the philosophy across its regular-season college football inventory.

One issue: College football is the sport where I might miss the BottomLine the most.

A random NBA Tuesday night isn’t the same as 2:47 p.m. on a college football Saturday, when dozens of games are happening simultaneously. Part of the fun is knowing what’s happening everywhere. You’re watching Alabama, but suddenly the ticker tells you Appalachian State is tied with the No. 8 team in the country with four minutes left.

Now what? Keep watching? Change channels or grab the phone?

Why The Shift?

That’s where ESPN’s cleaner-screen experiment gets interesting. We’ve spent years complaining that everyone watches television with a second screen. Broadcasters want our attention. Leagues want our attention. Advertisers definitely want our attention. Now the television is essentially telling us: For the rest of the scores, check your phone.

Good luck getting me back. Because once I’m there, I’m not just checking Clemson-Florida State. There’s a text. Then X and Instagram. Then fantasy, plus I remember I haven’t checked my bet yet.

Which brings us to gambling.

Sports betting has completely changed the way many fans consume games. A Washington Post analysis of 50 hours of televised sports found gambling references throughout broadcasts. That includes betting odds incorporated into ESPN tickers. So there’s another unintended consequence worth considering.

If the BottomLine disappears and I’m holding my phone more often, am I paying more attention to the football game? Or more attention to my bets?

That’s the great contradiction. ESPN is removing information from the screen to improve our focus at the exact moment sports fans have more information available than at any point in history.

Maybe that’s precisely why ESPN is right. We’ve reached information overload.

Score bug. Win probability. Fantasy stats. Betting odds. QR codes. Promotions. Upcoming programming. Breaking news. Sponsored graphics. Social media handles.

At some point, you need to actually see the football field.

ESPN isn’t completely abandoning scores. The network plans periodic score alerts during quarters, which might be the perfect compromise. Tell me when something important is happening instead of continuously feeding me every score from every game.

Maybe the BottomLine belongs to a different era, one I admittedly loved. There was something comforting about turning on ESPN and seeing that ticker crawling across the bottom. It told you that you were plugged into the sports world. Today, the sports world isn’t waiting at the bottom of our television anymore.

It’s in our pocket.

So, I’ll give ESPN credit. College football probably will look better this fall. I’ll enjoy the bigger picture and the cleaner screen. I’ll focus completely on the game in front of me.

Right after I check my phone to see the score of the other one.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

How Mitch Albom Convinced Christopher Gabriel to Give Talk Radio a Try

0

Christopher Gabriel spent years commanding the stage before Mitch Albom convinced him to trade scripts for a microphone. Today, Gabriel hosts mornings at 580 KMJ in Fresno, but his path to news/talk radio started far from a broadcast booth — it started in a Detroit theater. Gabriel built a career performing in stage productions across the country, taking on roles in works by Shakespeare, Tennessee Williams, and Neil Simon. That career eventually put him in Albom’s orbit, and the connection would change everything.

Gabriel was starring in one of Albom’s plays, Duck Hunter Shoots Angel, at Detroit’s City Theatre when the two struck up a friendship. The production ran inside the Hockeytown complex alongside the Red Wings and drew strong crowds throughout its run.

Albom had seen Gabriel perform in Tuesdays with Morrie in St. Paul and brought him out to Michigan for the new project. That decision put Gabriel in the same city — and eventually the same room — as Albom.

The pivotal moment came over lunch at Albom’s office at WJR, where the conversation drifted from theater to Gabriel’s growing restlessness with it.

“I love this play, I love doing it, but I feel like I’m a little burned out,” said Gabriel, recalling what he told Albom that day. “I’ve done so much theater — so much Shakespeare, Tennessee Williams, and Neil Simon — and I need a change. I need a creative change.”

Albom didn’t hesitate.

“Without skipping a beat, he goes, ‘I think you’d be pretty good as a talk show host,'” Gabriel said. “And I thought, well, I did radio in college — I never thought about that.”

Finding a New Way to Tell Stories

Gabriel didn’t view the jump to radio as leaving storytelling behind — he saw it as reinventing how he told stories. In theater, he’d delivered other writers’ words through roles like Iago in Othello and the gentleman caller in The Glass Menagerie. Radio offered something theater couldn’t: a chance to write the material himself while keeping the connection with an audience intact.

“What excited me was I saw the possibility of continuing to be a storyteller but using my own words,” Gabriel said. “Every day, I don’t care if you’re doing sports talk at WIP or news/talk at WGN or doing what we do here at KMJ, every day is a shared journey of discovery between whoever’s on our show and the audience, and the audience is the most important player in that equation.”

He carried that philosophy into how he approached interviews from the start.

“I never liked calling interviews interviews,” the KMJ morning host shared. “I like calling them conversations, because a conversation is far more intimate and far more personal.”

Nearly 22 Years and Still Going

Gabriel has now spent close to two decades building the career Albom first suggested, and the results have surprised him in more ways than one. He didn’t originally set out to host a news/talk program — sports talk was the goal from day one. Still, mentorship from a veteran colleague reshaped his approach to opportunity early in his career.

“I love this more,” said Gabriel, comparing his radio career to his years on stage. “I love the impact that we can make, that we can have on a community. We can affect change, sometimes when change is needed.”

He credited broadcaster Pat Kessler with teaching him the mindset that carried him through news/talk radio instead.

“He kept saying to me, just say yes,” Gabriel said. “Whatever job comes along, whatever chance you have, say yes.”

That advice paid off at 580 KMJ, where Gabriel’s morning show has built the kind of trust that Albom once told him radio could offer. Listeners regularly stop him in public to talk about stories they heard that morning, and the show recently earned recognition as one of the top mid-market morning programs in the country.

Gabriel doesn’t take that connection for granted, and he traces it directly back to the conversation that redirected his career.

“There’s a trust factor — people listen to us in the morning on our daily 6 to 9 show,” Gabriel said. “That tells me they trust us. They’re with us. They’re engaged with us, and there’s nothing better than that.”

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

20 Brands in 20 Days: Tommy Mattern, 105.7 The Point, 92.3 WIL, St. Louis

For 26 years — almost half his life — Tommy Mattern has programmed 105.7 The Point in St. Louis. Even longer, he’s been part of the St. Louis radio fabric itself. Since 1993, when he started at a local top 40 station as an intern, Mattern shaped the market’s sound. He worked every job available in that early building. Then he moved through programming roles before landing at The Point in October 2000.

These days, Mattern wears multiple hats at Hubbard Radio St. Louis. He’s the Operations Manager for the cluster — five major FM brands under one roof. He programs The Point day to day and oversees WIL (the country station) as OM/PD. Additionally, he handles sports programming at 101 ESPN. Yet if you ask him what defines his career, it’s The Point. That’s the station where he’s had the most freedom to think, experiment, and — most importantly — fail without fear.

The Rizzuto Standard

The most visible proof of that philosophy is the morning show. Since April 2014, The Point’s morning slot has been anchored by the Rizzuto Show. This program has essentially never left the #1 position. “I don’t know if there’s been a year since 2014 that we’ve been anything less than number one,” Mattern says. That show is a direct descendant of Woody and Rizzuto. This pairing dominated the market before Woody moved to iHeart in Los Angeles in March 2014. Rather than panic, Mattern doubled down on Scott Rizzuto, the co-host who’d become the show’s emotional center.

Rizzuto, whom Mattern hired from Sirius and K-Rock in New York around 2003, had already logged years with Mattern at The Point. However, the morning slot required something different — a talent capable of holding the station’s entire morning identity. Rizzuto rose to it. “That show is an elite standard in the market,” Mattern says. It’s the kind of statement that could sound like hyperbole. Yet Mattern has the ratings and revenue to back it up. For over a decade, the Rizzuto Show has been both the critical and commercial engine driving The Point’s dominance.

What makes Rizzuto’s success particularly interesting is what it reveals about Mattern’s hiring instincts. Notably, he’s drawn to people who understand the market viscerally — not as outsiders analyzing data, but as natives who’ve felt the community’s heartbeat. Most of his talent comes from St. Louis roots. He himself was born and raised there. Ultimately, that matters when you’re trying to program music that connects rather than merely complies.

Finding the Right Music, Not the Right Chart Position

This is where Mattern’s real philosophy emerges. Walk into The Point’s studio, and you won’t find a programmer obsessed with where a song sits on the alternative chart. Instead, you’ll find someone obsessed with whether a song feels right for St. Louis. “I tell people all the time: don’t look at my list, don’t look at my station,” Mattern says. “If you took my list and just played it where you’re at, chances are it probably won’t work.” He’s being deliberately anti-prescriptive here. Too many programmers fall into the trap of treating charts like gospel. They add songs because they’re bubbling at alternative radio, not because they believe in them. Mattern and his music director, Donnie, do the opposite. They look at what’s charting, sure. But they also hit clubs. They see bands live. They trust their gut.

That willingness to diverge from consensus has become The Point’s signature move. Look at the way Mattern has treated cross-format artists. When Jelly Roll’s “Son of a Sinner” was starting to move, Mattern didn’t wait for permission. He added it to WIL in the country format and added “Dead Man Walking” to The Point in the same week.

Notably, virtually no other station was touching him across either format at that time. “Not that I’m a very small part of that,” Mattern says, with characteristic humility, “because he was going to be a star regardless. But I think it just speaks to the willingness to take chances.” Shinedown’s “Searchlight” is another example. The song was positioned for country audiences. However, Mattern recognized it as Shinedown doing what Shinedown does — rock, fundamentally. “We made a track that we thought would connect with the country audience,” he says. “We did too, and being in the middle of the country and what a big Shinedown market this is for The Point, it made it really easy for us to say yes.”

The Country Station’s Hybrid Approach

WIL, the cluster’s country station, occupies an interesting middle ground. Mattern and his team take some of The Point’s experimental DNA there. Yet they do so with a lighter hand. Morgan Wallen, Ella Langley, and Luke Combs get play — they’re the format’s anchors. But so do artists like Red Clay Strays and Flatland Calvary. These bands can fill venues and sell tickets. Still, they’ve historically struggled to crack country radio playlists. “You know, everybody’s going to play those guys,” Mattern explains. “But we take chances on bands like Red Clay Strays and Flatland Calvary and those types of artists that they do really well selling concert tickets and selling out venues, but they hadn’t been getting a lot of airplay.” It’s the same philosophy applied to a different format — look for good music and trust that St. Louis listeners have better taste than the data suggests.

A Career Built on Trust

What’s remarkable about Mattern’s 26-year tenure is not simply that he’s held the same programming job for longer than most people hold careers. Rather, it’s that he’s been given the autonomy to do things that shouldn’t work according to industry logic. Additionally, he’s been proven right so consistently that his bosses stopped second-guessing him.

Rick Cummings, his longtime leader at Emmis, set that tone early. He said: “Do what you think is right. Find the music that you think connects and roll with it.” That directive could have been window dressing. Instead, Mattern made it sacred. “Thank God we’ve never had, or at least we’ve had very few conversations about which direction I should be going with that over the years,” he says. Even after Hubbard acquired the cluster in 2018, that culture persisted. “Hubbard’s been great about it,” Mattern notes. “They have the trust in us, and we keep it going.”

That freedom is rare. Most programmers operate in an environment of constant justification — defending song adds, explaining format direction, building PowerPoints to prove their instincts are right. But Mattern’s track record has earned him the autonomy to simply trust his gut. Ultimately, he’s let St. Louis listeners benefit from three decades of someone who’s refused to mistake data for judgment.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Why College Football Kicking Off Without Lee Corso Just Doesn’t Feel The Same

0

It’s cliché to say that we will never see anyone like (fill in the blank) ever again. Each personality is unique. The roles they play are valuable. Their character sets them apart. That was Lee Corso. It didn’t dawn on me until having a conversation with ESPN College GameDay host Rece Davis earlier this week that, for the first time ever, the destination program of college football on Saturdays will enter its first season without “LC.”

Last year, ESPN opened its 39th season of College GameDay by celebrating its greatest ending. A stirring three-hour tribute honored a man who became, quite literally, the face of the sport itself. When you thought about Saturday mornings in the fall, you thought about Lee Corso. Now, the new season begins with the program’s 40th birthday. Yet I find myself asking: Is it even possible in today’s sports media landscape to ever see anyone like Lee Corso again?

What made Corso special was his humility. He understood that a balance of quality and authenticity mattered most to the Saturday morning viewing audience. He could be critical when the moment demanded it, but he celebrated achievement just as much.

From 1987 through last year’s college football season, Corso witnessed the sport’s growth and the evolution of its coverage while remaining true to himself.

That’s not something you see in media circles today.

Remaining True

The demands of sports television today require versatility, flexibility and a willingness to be in as many places as possible wherever content can be consumed. Corso never needed to be everywhere. Saturday mornings were Corso’s sermon, and we watched willingly for generations.

He was the definition of appointment viewing. He provided insight, opinion and analysis before building toward his crescendo: the signoff in which he donned the headgear of the team he believed would be victorious.

Corso didn’t care about your approval, nor did he react to your hate. There was no semblance of him trying to prove his worth to the network or his place in ESPN’s hierarchy. All that mattered to Corso was whether you watched and had a good time doing it.

That approach seems almost foreign by today’s standards. Because, in the end, as he said for generations: “It’s entertainment, sweetheart. Football’s our vehicle.”

Who today could replicate the impact Corso had on a singular program, network or sport?

The McAfee Argument

The first person many would point to is Pat McAfee, the new face of ESPN. Impact? Yes. Following? Surely. The ability to create a legacy like Corso’s? Doubtful. McAfee’s history has taken him from independent media to radio, Barstool Sports, FanDuel and ESPN. Who’s to say Netflix might not be next, despite reports that ESPN wants to pay him between $60 million and $65 million to remain with the network?

That’s not a knock on McAfee. It’s simply the reality of trying to compare anyone to Corso. Corso was beloved by almost everyone and always stayed true to ESPN.

What got me thinking about this was another giant loss earlier this week. After Dolly Parton’s passing, I asked several people whether anyone in sports or sports media was as universally beloved as the country music icon. Maybe it’s a reason of timing with college football starting tomorrow, but the lone name that kept coming up was Lee Corso.

Loved by all. Revered by many. Truly unique because he was so simple.

That’s why McAfee could never fill the shoes Corso left behind on College GameDay. The crescendo McAfee creates at the end of every College GameDay simply doesn’t have the impact or stickiness of a Corso headgear selection.

And could you say McAfee is universally adored? Likely not. He has plenty of detractors, some because of legitimate criticism and others because they simply don’t like his style. McAfee welcomes the hate. He has even made an album about it.

Corso’s humility made him larger than the sport itself. He laughed at himself as easily as he laughed with others. He didn’t have to be right with his predictions, but he never hesitated to stand by them. But he never lost the coach’s instinct to teach, offering analysis and advice with an eye toward solutions.

No kicking contest will ever match that.

A Different Feel

Maybe that’s why the original statement fits so well with Lee Corso. Maybe we will never see another grand marshal of college football’s weekly parade. That was and may forever be Lee Corso.

College football enters a new era this fall. Not because the game has changed, the playoff has expanded or the sport has reinvented itself, but because one familiar presence is now officially missing from the Saturdays that shaped generations.

Lee Corso won’t be on the set as college football kicks off another season. He won’t be holding up a headgear pick. He won’t be there to remind us that, no matter how seriously we take college football, it’s still supposed to be fun.

For nearly four decades, Corso was part of the fabric of the sport. His absence at the start of a new season won’t simply be noticed on College GameDay. It will be felt every Saturday morning, in every big matchup and throughout the fall weekends when fans gather around their televisions to watch college football.

The sport will move forward. It always does. Some may argue ESPN has already moved forward from Corso years ago. But there will only ever be one Lee Corso. And for the first time, college football begins a season without him anywhere around it.

That’s going to take some getting used to.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Stephen A. Smith’s Guest List Complaint Says More About Him Than His Absent Guests

0

Stephen A. Smith didn’t hold back this week on his SiriusXM show, and he named names while he was at it. He blasted Don Lemon, Jemele Hill, and Michelle Obama for what he described as a pattern of public criticism paired with private silence. Kamala Harris and Jasmine Crockett made his list too, and so did NABJ president Errin Haines. The monologue ran long, but it also raised a question Smith probably didn’t intend to ask about himself.

Here’s what he told his audience, word for word:

“I’ve invited Don Lemon on this show. Don Lemon wants to talk privately first, but he said a whole bunch of things publicly. President Errin Haines for NABJ — I’ve invited her on the show! She wants to talk privately after she spoke publicly. I’ve invited Jasmine Crockett on the show — crickets. I ain’t hear a word.

“I’ve invited Kamala Harris on the show — crickets. I ain’t hear a word — publicly. Privately, Kamala Harris and I already met face-to-face over a year ago. Two hours. Nobody brings that up. Michelle Obama has been invited on this show. Haven’t heard a word. Cari Champion and Jemele Hill have been invited on this show. I ain’t got no problems. Ladies and gentlemen … I really don’t have time for hatred in my heart. I certainly don’t hate any of these women. I’ve got nothing but love for them.”

That’s a lengthy roll call for one segment, and it’s also a lot of assumed motive delivered without much pushback. Smith frames every non-appearance as evasion, yet he never once considers that these figures might simply view his show differently than he does. Perhaps they don’t see it as the platform he believes it to be. Perhaps they’ve weighed the risk of a combative format against the reward and decided to pass. Either way, his monologue invites a question he didn’t ask himself: what does his guest list actually say about him?

A Question Smith Should Ask Himself

Smith built his career on confrontation, and that style has made First Take appointment viewing for over a decade. It’s also the exact reason some high-profile figures might steer clear of his SiriusXM program. Sitting across from Smith means signing up for cross-examination rather than conversation, and not everyone wants that kind of exposure. Consequently, skipping his show isn’t automatically a snub; it could simply be a calculated choice.

Additionally, Smith’s framing ignores an obvious possibility: timing. Politicians and media figures juggle packed schedules, so a single unanswered invite doesn’t necessarily signal disrespect. Meanwhile, private conversations — like the one Smith says he had with Harris — don’t always need a public sequel to matter. Nevertheless, Smith chose to publicize that snub rather than let the private meeting speak for itself.

Above all, Smith’s grievance reveals as much about his ego as it does about anyone’s avoidance. He wants credit for reaching out, and he wants an audience to witness the rejection when it happens. That’s a curious mix of generosity and score-keeping, and it undercuts his claim that there’s no hatred in his heart.

I heard directly from one of the people Smith named during his monologue, and their response complicates his narrative even further. Their stance was blunt: “I can’t ignore something I’ve never been asked to do.” That single line dismantles the premise that silence equals avoidance, since an unextended invitation can’t logically be ignored.

The Invitation Nobody Talks About

This source went a step further, and their follow-up claim reframes the entire dispute. According to them, their own producers had invited Smith onto their podcast, only to receive the same non-response Smith complained about publicly. If accurate, that detail turns Smith’s monologue into a case of projection rather than genuine grievance.

Therefore, the real story isn’t about who’s dodging Stephen A. Smith. It’s about a media figure who built a brand on accountability suddenly struggling to apply that standard to himself. Smith wants his invitations honored immediately, yet he apparently sat on one of his own. That’s not hypocrisy in the legal sense, but it’s close enough to raise eyebrows among anyone paying attention.

Ultimately, Smith is entitled to feel frustrated when high-profile guests decline his show. However, he isn’t entitled to a one-sided narrative where every absence gets treated as an insult. Silence can mean disinterest, sure, but it can also mean a scheduling conflict, a wariness of the format, or — in at least one case — an invitation that never actually arrived. Smith’s SiriusXM platform is influential, but influence doesn’t guarantee an audience owes him their time.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Ken West WERS-FM: Community Over Commercial Radio Model

0

Whoever said you can’t go home again didn’t know Ken West. And, in this case, they were completely wrong. Home has turned out to be a really great place to be.

After thirty years in Boston radio — ten with CBS Radio Classic Rock WZLX/Boston and twenty with Beasley’s Boston cluster — West was downsized. His roles included Programming, Music, and Marketing Director for Classic Hits WROR and Rock 92.9 WBOS. That’s when he went back home. He took a position as Brand Manager at Emerson College’s radio station 88.9 FM, WERS-FM. West had worked there as a student. Now he’s helping tutor young broadcasters.

The station has been around for more than seventy-five years. It has a professional staff of ten people with anywhere from forty to seventy-five students depending on the semester. Most importantly, the station maintains an extremely loyal listening audience.

“I never realized the sense of community a radio station could have,” West says. “I’d seen it with personalities where people would say listening feels like hanging out with my friends. That makes perfect sense for a show. But I’ve never experienced people talking about the radio station in that way.”

West believes trust drives the feeling of community. “It’s about curation,” he explains. “The listeners trust that when we serve something up it’s been vetted. So, whether they like it or not, it isn’t just from an algorithm. And people appreciate that.”

There is also a sense of investment for supporters. As a non-commercial entity, a lot of the budget comes from listener donations. “I think people cared about other stations I’ve worked at,” West notes. “But it’s different here because they’re actively putting their credit card down.”

Understanding the Target Audience

That monetary investment from listeners brings up an interesting point. While the station’s staff is primarily students, the target audience is not.

“Our donors are not 20-somethings,” West explains. “The core is people who are forty plus. Many are fatigued on what commercial radio has to offer. They used to listen to WBCN, WFNX, or WBRU. But those stations are gone. They still prefer a deeper experience from the radio. So, they trust us to give them something they will not get on other stations.”

That doesn’t mean they don’t play well-known songs. “I haven’t heard listeners say stop playing hits,” West says. “I’ve only heard them say keep making it interesting. We play hits, just not five or six in a row. Instead, we scatter them throughout each hour. We mix them with new or surprising older songs that WROR or WZLX aren’t going to play.”

That mandate to keep things interesting gives West and the team freedom to make creative programming choices. “I came from 250 songs in the library,” he notes. “Maybe stretch it to 251. Here, I stopped counting when I got to around 2,100 titles.”

Being interesting goes beyond a big library. For International Woman’s Month, the station spotlighted a different female artist each day. Then on International Woman’s Day, it was female performers all day long. Similarly, on Juneteenth, they featured African American artists. And on 617 day, the station played all local music. “That’s one of the fun things about this station,” West says. “You can stir the pot like crazy, and people aren’t going to go running from it. They crave it.”

That sort of programming helps separate WERS from its closest competitor, WXRV — a commercial AAA station. While the two overlap musically, it’s important for West to differentiate WERS in other ways.

“It’s not like two top 40 stations where we are trying to match them song for song,” West says. “But we have to be cognizant of them. I don’t want people to say, ‘why would I pay money to you when I can get that exact thing at the river?'”

Enter the Students

Another thing that clearly sets the station apart from its competition is having students on the air. While you might think that works against WERS compared to a polished commercial airstaff, that isn’t the case.

“We aspire to be the things our audience would like us to be,” West explains. “That includes being real human beings on the air. And we do have students on the air. It’s pretty obvious when you listen that they are learning. But our audience tells us they like it and they support that mission.”

West says the professional staff spend a lot of time coaching the students. They build systems to create the best possible learning experience. For student hosts, it starts with teaching the basics. This includes how to talk on the radio and follow the clock. “Working with the students is fascinating,” West notes. “We provide them with something like training wheels. This teaches them how to do the format correctly.”

Once they have that down, it becomes about helping students find their personality. “I’ll hear them say something about a band they are a fan of,” West says. “And I tell them I want to hear more like that. Hopefully by the end of the semester it becomes about music-related content and their personal experiences. It’s very similar to what you would teach a professional. But you have to teach them all of it.”

Looking Back to Commercial Radio

Speaking of professional broadcasters, West says he did bring a few things with him to the new position. However, he had to tread lightly considering the station was doing well.

“There wasn’t anything broken when I got here,” West explains. “But I did bring some things commercial radio does. Clear, concise imaging for example. Adjusting the clocks so the music flows better through different eras and tempos.” He continues, “I wasn’t saying let’s pare this down to 250 titles. But we can make it perform a little better.”

Just like some of what he learned in commercial radio was helpful at WERS, some of what he has seen in this position has led to thoughts about what commercial radio is missing. “I’m not here to bash commercial radio,” West says. “But I do think maybe we’ve told ourselves some stories that aren’t completely true.”

West thinks the industry convinced itself that young people don’t like radio. That hasn’t been his experience. “We always thought they only listen to streaming services,” he says. “But they actually use both. They listen to Spotify, but they also want to participate in the human connection part of it. There is a host, and we’re listening to music together.”

Contrary to what’s been said about colleges selling off their stations due to lack of student interest, West says there is no shortage of people who want to be part of WERS. “I was concerned coming in,” West admits. “But every time we do an open house, easily over a hundred applications come in. Every time there are more people interested than we have open positions.”

And it isn’t just students pursuing media careers. “Some are radio listeners, some are music fans, and some say they don’t know anything about radio,” West says. “Some don’t listen but are genuinely curious. I’ve seen writing majors come in with zero knowledge about radio. They come out on the other end as the Student Programming Coordinator. That’s basically the Assistant Program Director. Even if they never work in radio, they’ve learned how to manage a team and other important skills.”

Suggestions from the Non-Commercial World

That experience leads to West’s first suggestion for commercial radio: create opportunities for young folks like he sees at WERS. “I was a student broadcaster,” West says. “I was an intern. That’s how I got my start. But I didn’t see that many interns in my last few years before coming here. How are they going to be interested if they can’t experience it? And that doesn’t just mean having a street team who never sees anybody at the radio station.”

His second suggestion is to listen more to what the listeners are saying. “You can’t listen to every word everybody says,” West explains. “But the audience will tell you when you’re genuine. The audience will also tell you when you’ve missed the mark. If you tap into those things, you can nurture a community of people. They will be less transactional and more engaged in what you’re trying to do.”

Finally, he suggests broadcasters try to recapture something that seems to be missing from commercial radio: fun. “When did we lose the fun of being in radio?” West asks. “Most people I know got into it because they love music. They wanted to have fun, or both. And it’s okay to do that. You can be disciplined and professional. But we don’t work in a bank,” West says. “It’s important because fun is contagious. Fun can trickle down to staff and trickle out of the speakers to the listener.”

And if all else fails, having fun might be the best way to go out. “Try something fun, try something stupid, and stand on the hill for it,” encourages West. “I’d much rather go down saying, ‘I got blown out because I tried this thing that was fun and it didn’t work out’ than for some other dumb reason.”

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Fantasy Football Draft Strategy for Rock Radio Programmers

0

Have you drafted yet? It’s fantasy football draft season. Millions are building power rankings, debating sleepers, running mock drafts, and pretending they’re NFL GMs. As I was preparing for mine, the parallel between fantasy football and RockTernative business hit me like Myles Garrett blowing up the pocket.

Because fantasy football is like business — resource allocation, investing and divesting, just like RockTernative radio.

Fantasy players know there’s real strategy involved — the kind you only learn from experience, knowing ball, or having that friend who can draft a team for you. Notably, draft strategy is real, and it can make or break your season or your station.

Take a QB too early, and you’ll likely get cooked.

Overpay a morning show, and there goes the ROI.

Over-rely on a heavy-load RB, and one injury destroys you.

Shrink and overwork the staff, and quality goes south.

Big names are great, but productivity is better.

Then there are salary cap and auction leagues, where every dollar becomes another draft decision. Spend too early and you’re broke by Week 9. Conversely, spend too late and you miss the move that could’ve taken you to the Super Bowl.

That’s exactly where the RockTernative parallel kicks in. Radio has its windows of opportunity — and a salary cap — we just don’t see it like we once did.

Back in the Day

Back in the day, PDs had actual spreadsheets — itemized budgets, month by month, line by line. “Awesome, I have T-shirt money this month!” And those budgets were usually locked and dependable — they allowed brands to build a strategy and stick to it.

Today, “the budget” is often recreated monthly, and it’s mostly payroll and keeping-the-lights-on stuff like rent, Nielsen, insurance, music licensing. Emergency funding for research or tactical might be possible, but it’s almost never approved in advance. Forget about T-shirts.

But the draft is coming. The need to make key decisions will come. When should you spend? What should you spend on? When should you be conservative? When should you take a risk? And when should you make a move that could win the season?

The RockTernative Draft

I could argue that every season is draft season at RockTernative. Do we draft a perceptual, an OMT, a concert? Do we hire someone to create more digital content? Mic 4 in mornings versus digital marketing — which will move the needle more? Would outsourcing production to have live nights drive more revenue?

The downsizing of the industry takes a new piece of our hearts every quarter. But look around — clusters are empty. Radio can no longer afford the rosters it once had, so every draft choice is critically important.

Every PD needs to think like a GM, and every GM needs to think like a PD. Why? Because every station is a roster, and every roster is open for review, improvement, cuts, and more.

Your Roster Construction Challenge

Here’s a light exercise to sharpen your roster construction or draft chops because you may need those chops sooner than you think.

You must draft one of each. You only have $11M. Go.

How’d your band turn out? Hard to go wrong here, but you get the point. How you draft, spend, and construct your roster means everything. Is yours built to stack as many wins as possible? Did you consider different scenarios and compare ROI?

It’s reality. Do we go all-in on mornings or spend evenly across dayparts? Do we invest more on imaging instead of a new van? Should we sacrifice contests if it means live weekends?

Decisions like that, when stacked over time, eventually add up to where you are.

The $20,000 Challenge

Let’s say you’ve been given $20,000 cash to giveaway to grow weekday numbers. It must be spent in September. How will you execute? Not unlike deciding which RB1 to choose in fantasy, the strategy here is important. Same cash, lots of different strategies — which one will be best for your situation?

$100 giveaway, 10x per day.

$250 giveaway, 4x per day.

$333.33, 3x per day.

$500 giveaway, 2x per day.

$1,000 giveaway, 1x per day.

$2,500 Fridays.

$5,000 Mondays.

Most PDs and talent play fantasy football. Sadly, most aren’t included in the budget process at their stations. If that’s you, get involved. Initiate, be loud, bring smart ideas, be a part of the station drafts and trades.

And if you’re a GM, talk with your PD — because that seemingly simple cost cut could lead to a crisis you didn’t foresee. But it could’ve been healed by a band-aid if done differently.

Fantasy football or RockTernative radio — draft and build the roster and playbook wisely. Every decision counts on the scoreboard.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Heather Gersten Reflects on 23 Years Before Rhode Island Hall of Fame Induction

0

Heather Gersten has spent 23 years waking up Southern New England, and this September, the Rhode Island Radio & TV Hall of Fame will finally make it official. Even so, ask her how she feels about the induction, and she pauses.

“I actually don’t feel ready for it,” Gersten admitted. “So many people have told me that I ‘deserve’ it, but I’m feeling like I have so much more work to do.” She laughed off the disbelief, adding, “Maybe I’m just still in shock over the whole thing, lol.”

That mix of humility and drive has defined her run at Lite 105/WWLI in Providence, where she now co-hosts mornings with Matty Blake and serves as Assistant Program Director and Imaging Director for the station.

Finding the Right Partner in Matty Blake

Gersten calls Blake her favorite radio partner ever, and the two didn’t land together by accident. “I’ve wanted to work with Matty for a long time, and I’m so glad we were able to make it happen,” she said.

She credits their chemistry to mutual respect, something she says wasn’t always a given earlier in her career. “I think he’s hilarious with lots of fun opinions and tons of heart, and we completely respect each other,” Gersten explained. “It’s incredibly refreshing because it wasn’t always that way for me.”

That foundation has translated into something bigger than a show. “I’m extremely proud of the H & M community that we’ve built,” she said, referring to the loyal following that tunes in daily for their banter and their bond.

Family Radio Since the Lite Rock Days

Long before the current lineup, Gersten got her start at the station when it still carried the name Lite Rock 105, working alongside Gary DeGraide near the end of his tenure. The lesson from that era still guides her today.

“Lite 105 is FAMILY radio. I learned that early on, and it’s so still true today,” she said. She’s careful about how far the show pushes, even while embracing a bolder tone. “While we can be ‘clever’ and ‘crafty’ with adult language and adult topics, I don’t ever want to give a parent a reason to switch the station because they’ve got kids in the car and they’re upset with something we’ve said.”

A First-Name Honor That Still Means Something

Gersten is the lead name on the “Heather & Matty” marquee, a distinction that *unfortunately* remains uncommon for women in morning radio. She doesn’t take it lightly. “That’s actually one of the things I’m most proud of,” she said. “I worked really hard to get here, and I’m glad Cumulus recognized that and allowed me to have that first-name honor back in 2013.”

Wearing Both the On-Air and Behind-the-Scenes Hats

Beyond the mic, Gersten’s fingerprints are on nearly everything listeners hear across the station’s day. As Assistant Program Director and Imaging Director, she produces the promos and imaging as well.

“It’s awesome to have so much invested in this station,” she said, “and being part of the promotion and production process from early on only helps me sell it on the air.” She lights up describing the creative process itself. “I love being part of the process, watching a crazy idea I have turn into a full-blown promotion and event,” Gersten said. “It’s made me a better broadcaster to get involved in all aspects of radio.”

Her voice extends well past Lite 105, too. Gersten also voicetracks for Classic Hits 104.1 in Buffalo, The Wolf 106.3 in Providence, and The Wolf 102.3 in New London, Connecticut.

Benchmarks, Bits and Building a Loyal Audience

I asked Gersten about the show’s recurring segments, and the list comes fast. “We have so many benchmarks, it’s ridiculous,” she said. Some, like Therapy Thursday, the Heather Games, and Tell Us Something Good, anchor specific days of the week. “Our audience has come to look forward to them,” she noted.

Others, including IN or OUT, Blank You Very Much, Marvelous Moments in Marriage, and You Had One Job, work differently. “That’s how we like to categorize our stories,” Gersten said, “and frankly, it makes it more fun to tell these stories because we have produced intros for all of those bits.”

Steve Perry and a Fangirl Moment Realized

Over the years, Gersten has interviewed music icons including Elton John, Billy Joel, Kevin Costner, and Steve Perry. I asked her which stood out most.

“Hands down, Steve Perry,” she said. “I mean, I’ve crushed on him since I was 12 and saw Journey in concert.” Gersten landed one of Perry’s first interviews after he came out of retirement, then convinced him to co-host her show in New York City. The two later teamed up for a breast cancer fundraiser in Providence. “We raised over $20k for a local charity,” she said. “I’m still pinching myself that any of that ever happened.”

Community Work as a Core Value

Gersten has long championed the RISPCA and the Hasbro Children’s Hospital Radiothon, and she views that commitment as essential to the job, not optional. “If you have the privilege, and I mean that, the PRIVILEGE of doing what I do for a living and you’re not giving back to your community, then you don’t deserve the job,” she said firmly. “Set an example, donate your time, and get involved.”

Why Local Radio Still Matters

After 35 years in the industry, Gersten remains convinced that personality-driven local radio holds a place podcasts and streaming can’t replace. “Connecting with listeners is the key to winning,” she said.

She points to the Monday show after the Brown University shooting as proof. “Matty and I had one of our best shows that day, because we bonded with our listeners in a way that no other medium could,” Gersten said. “We all helped each other heal that day, and I’ll never forget it.”

Advice for the Next Generation

For newcomers hoping to build a career like hers, Gersten keeps her advice simple. “Get to know the air talent in your area and ask a ton of questions. Learn from the people you admire,” she said. Success rarely arrives overnight, either. “Don’t ever expect to make it to the top right away,” she added. “You gotta show up on time, work hard and be willing to put in the effort to get better.”

Even now, decades into her career, Gersten hasn’t stopped refining her craft. “I still aircheck myself every day,” she said, a habit that has clearly served her well across more than two decades behind the mic.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

How The Wall Street Journal’s AI Double Standard Undermines Its Perplexity Lawsuit

Billionaire, investor, philanthropist, and now a prime example of how a media company can lose a lawsuit. Wall Street Journal op-ed contributor Stanley Druckenmiller admitted this week he used AI for his latest column, titled “Let the Bond Market Speak,” which was published on Tuesday.

If you want to use AI, that’s fine — I don’t agree, but whatever you do, you boo-boo. However, when the company you’re writing for is suing an AI company for copyright infringement, this creates a very serious double standard that needs to be addressed.

Let’s take a step back for a second. In 2024, News Corp., which owns the Journal, sued the AI company Perplexity for copyright infringement. According to a NewsNation report, News Corp. alleged, “Perplexity is illegally using the company’s copyrighted news content to feed search queries for its AI software.”

This lawsuit is ongoing and is currently in the “discovery” stage. Please note, “copyrighted news content” includes opinion columns.

How an AI-Written Column Comes Together

Here is exactly how Google AI Gemini says it creates a news column:

When writing a column, AI shifts from purely summarizing facts to building a structured argument guided by specific editorial instructions.

  1. Thesis and Stance Conditioning — A standard news model aims for neutral balance, but a column requires a point of view. The system receives a clear directive, either from a prompt or a style guide — for example, “Write an opinion column arguing why the city council should fund public transit over highway expansion.” This sets the target thesis that guides word selection.
  2. Adopting a Specific Persona (Voice and Tone) — Human columnists have recognizable writing styles. AI mimics this through system prompts and few-shot prompting. Tone settings instruct a specific voice — witty, authoritative, cynical, or conversational — while style matching has the model analyze sample articles from a specific writer or publication to replicate sentence structure, vocabulary choices, and rhetorical devices, such as rhetorical questions or anecdotes.
  3. Argumentative Structuring — Rather than using the “inverted pyramid” of straight news, the AI applies persuasive writing frameworks: a hook that opens with a vivid scene or surprising statistic, a counter-argument that addresses objections before refuting them, and a call to action that closes with a memorable takeaway.
  4. Context Grounding (RAG) — To anchor the column’s arguments in real-world facts rather than empty rhetoric, newsrooms use Retrieval-Augmented Generation. The AI retrieves live data, policy reports, or recent quotes to weave into its narrative.

The Prompt Behind the Column

This is the overarching problem for The Wall Street Journal and News Corp.

While we don’t know exactly what AI system Druckenmiller used to help amplify his lack of writing capability (I would love the irony if it was Perplexity), we do know that whatever system it was, it pulled its information from somewhere on the internet — not from Druckenmiller’s cabeza.

So, using the information we have at hand, the prompt Mr. Druckenmiller had to input into the AI system he used must have looked something like this: “AI, please create an op-ed article in the writing style of Stanley Druckenmiller criticizing Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s debt buyback plan.”

In order to get the “tone” of Druckenmiller, the AI would have had to analyze his style and use his previously copyrighted pieces to create a new one. This includes pieces he wrote and had published outside of The Wall Street Journal‘s purview. Thus, it’s reasonable to believe this piece, co-written by AI and Druckenmiller, likely infringed on someone else’s copyright.

News Corp. Can’t Have It Both Ways

News Corp. needs to get all of its writers on the same page. You cannot sue an AI company for copyright infringement and then also use AI to create your own content.

According to the New York Post (also owned by News Corp.), the Journal‘s editor, Paul Gigot, called AI “a fact of modern life. People will use it to assist in their work and their writing, including with research, checking grammar, editing, and more.”

Gigot later told his sister outlet, “The question for us is whether what we publish from contributors reflects an author’s original argument, and if the author has the standing and credibility to make it.”

Here is the problem, News Corp.: you cannot use AI only when it’s convenient for you. This article likely infringed on someone else’s copyright, since Druckenmiller has written for other outlets besides the Journal.

Allowing your outlets to use AI while you have a pending court case against an AI company is reckless and negligent. Quite frankly, it’s a good way to lose your lawsuit. And remember, President Donald Trump doesn’t like losers. Or in pop culture terms: happy AI games, and may the odds be ever in your favor.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.