It’s time for sports fans to admit a hard truth: we were wrong. Not about who’s going to win the Super Bowl or which player prop to bet on. We were wrong about cable television. For years, sports fans complained about bloated cable packages, high monthly fees, and hundreds of channels we never watched. But in our rush to cut the cord and embrace the streaming revolution, we failed to appreciate the value that cable offered—particularly for sports.
This week, Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav said the quiet part out loud during an earnings call: the consumer streaming experience is broken. He said that the industry needs to clean up the consumer experience in needing multiple (he said 18) apps to get everything. Zaslav suggested that it needs to be cleaned up through partnerships, consolidation, and some companies exiting the streaming game. His assessment is blunt and accurate—but it’s also a case of too little, too late.
For the sports fan, the current streaming model is not an upgrade. It’s a downgrade wrapped in an illusion of choice.
Sports remain the most-watched live television in America. This summer alone, both Major League Baseball and the WNBA saw notable increases in viewership compared to the previous year. Our appetite for live sports is insatiable. But our ability to access them affordably and conveniently is getting worse.
The Cost of NFL Football
Take the upcoming NFL season as a case study. If you want to follow the league without a traditional cable subscription, here’s what it will cost you monthly:
ESPN’s direct-to-consumer product will cost you $29.99/month. Amazon Prime for Thursday Night Football will cost you $14.99/month. Peacock has Sunday Night Football and Peacock exclusive games at $11.99/month. Netflix owns Christmas Day for $22.99/month. If you’d like access to CBS and FOX, Paramount+ will cost you $11.99/month and FOX One will cost you $19.99/month.
That’s over $110 per month. If you maintain these subscriptions from the start of the regular season through the Super Bowl, the total investment exceeds $650. And that doesn’t even include the hidden cost of high-speed internet—an absolute necessity for streaming.
Yes, you could skip Netflix since it only broadcasts games on one day this season. But that’s a temporary reprieve. More games—and more fragmentation—are coming.
So, ask yourself: was cable really that bad?
Simplicity Was the Ultimate Unknown Value
When sports fans complained about paying a high price for channels we didn’t watch, we failed to acknowledge that cable gave us everything in one place—NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, and more. It wasn’t perfect, but it was simple, and that simplicity had real value.
Now, instead of flipping channels, we juggle apps, logins, and blackouts. If you’re a baseball fan, you used to know where every game was. Today, you’ll need to check your local RSN, Apple TV+, Roku, ESPN, FOX, or the MLB’s own platform—just to see if your team is even available.
We traded clarity for complexity. And now we’re paying the price—literally and figuratively.
The only constant in media is change. We’ve all evolved over the past decade, adapting to new technologies and behaviors. Sports fans are no exception. But if today’s model is frustrating, the future may be even more so.
Prepare Now for What’s To Come
Instead of hoping for a return to simplicity, we need to prepare for more fragmentation, more paywalls, and more frustration. Zaslav’s comments about improving the consumer experience are valid, but collaboration among streaming giants seems unlikely unless it serves their bottom lines. If shared access doesn’t result in more subscribers, more revenue, and more control—why would they bother?
Professional sports leagues will continue to strike deals with multiple platforms because they can. Their product has never been hotter. And as broadcast rights become more expensive, the cost will continue to be passed on to consumers.
Ultimately, this is the reality we’ve created. We wanted à la carte options. We wanted to only pay for what we watched. But now we’re paying more than ever—for less.
It’s unlikely we’ll ever return to the way things were. The allure of professional sports is too strong, the demand too high, and the profit margins too tempting. Streaming platforms will raise prices incrementally—$5 here, $10 there—just enough to dull the pain in the short term but compound it over time.
Ironically, the very companies that made sports more accessible in theory are now the ones making it harder to watch. And while I respect David Zaslav’s call for reform, it’s not the platforms that need to change—it’s us.
Sports fans created this problem. And if we’re not careful, we may reach a point where the cost of staying connected outweighs the love of the game. When that day comes, many fans may simply opt out.
It won’t happen overnight. But it will happen. That’s the cost of business.
Let’s hope it doesn’t get to the point where it’s too little, too late—for the fans, and for sports itself.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.







