FOX’s strategy is pretty transparent. Adding Dave Portnoy to Big Noon Kickoff is a move to appeal to, and hopefully steal, some or most of the audience that Pat McAfee has brought to ESPN’s College GameDay in recent years.
Transparent doesn’t mean bad. It’s really smart. How do you combat a cult of personality? With a bigger cult of personality. And with all due respect to the Big Noon cast, I don’t see anyone on that show that people will ride for the way McAfee’s fans ride for him. Portnoy brings influence over a group that has college football fans in it, but it also has a lot of people that don’t care about college football and will tune in just for him. That is added audience, which is a prized possession in the media business.
Barstool wins. It gets more eyeballs, a nice new revenue stream, and a new platform for its content and advertisers. FOX wins because Portnoy is instantly the biggest star on Big Noon Kickoff, and, well, something has to go on FS1.
Do you know who loses? OutKick.
Maybe “loses” is a strong word here. The deal between FOX and Barstool doesn’t cost OutKick anything, but it does send a very clear message: OutKick can’t do for FOX what Barstool does.
Cost vs Benefit
Media executives have been stuck in CYA mode for a long time. Investment is risky. Cutting costs is the only safe way to impact the bottom line.
That’s what makes passing over OutKick a little shocking to me. FOX owns that site and its content outright. OutKick founder Clay Travis was doing regular segments on Big Noon Kickoff. Perhaps you remember that really weird bus.
And look, for all I know, Travis will continue to be on Big Noon Kickoff, but if the goal of the deal with Portnoy really is to have a Big Ten fanboy on the show, why would it continue to make room for a proud fan of the SEC?
The bigger shock may be the FS1 show. That network has cycled through so many shows, and very few of them have made a real impact. Almost none of them have put a dent in ESPN’s weekday lineup.
It would have been so easy and so much cheaper to take any of the OutKick talents and slide them into the slots vacated by the three shows FS1 recently canceled. Prioritizing costs over potential benefits would have made sense. History tells you there isn’t a high ceiling for the network’s talking head shows, but credit to Eric Shanks and Mark Silverman, who saw an opportunity to change that.
Is OutKick Still A Sports Brand?
When FOX acquired OutKick, Travis touted his company as the perfect bridge between FOX’s sports programming and its über-popular cable news network, and at the time, I thought he was right—no pun intended. OutKick served up a little bit of sports and a whole lot of culture war axe grinding. It was sports content following the FOX News playbook.
But in recent years, sports has been de-emphasized by OutKick. The brand still has Dan Dakich’s Don’t @ Me and OutKick Hot Mic with Jonathan Hutton and Chad Withrow, but those shows stay in the digital space.
When FOX brings OutKick to TV, it has been almost exclusively on FOX News. Travis is a guest with the entire primetime lineup, Tomi Lahren does the same, and Riley Gaines pops up in studio during the afternoons. Travis has even said in the past that he expects more OutKick content to be on the network in the future. And in a recent interview with Semafor, he said that OutKick was not a competitor to Barstool—the reasons were about political content, not sports.
So maybe FOX Sports bosses didn’t weigh OutKick vs. Barstool when thinking about what comes next for FS1. Maybe no one had to make the argument that the benefits of Barstool outweigh the cost savings of OutKick. Maybe they looked at OutKick and didn’t see a real sports brand anymore.
Recategorization Not Remorse
The deal with Barstool doesn’t say anything about the way FOX feels about its purchase of OutKick. I would argue that the brand plays an important role for FOX. It gives the company a platform with strong reach to grow future FOX News talent and gives FOX News talent with potential a place to get more reps and grow into a TV star.
Even if OutKick is no longer doing what it was initially acquired to do, it still has value. That value is just not in the sports space. It’s a recategorization. It doesn’t mean FOX is showing signs of buyer’s remorse.
I do wonder where it leaves OutKick in the eyes of FOX bosses long-term, but it’s genuinely just a wonder. I don’t know enough to have an opinion or make a prediction. Maybe the whole “bridge between news and sports” idea was just branding from Travis, and the vision for OutKick has always been about FOX News.
Travis started out as a sports talent. OutKick started out as a sports brand. But Travis isn’t a sports talent anymore. Even if he still talks about sports on his website, his biggest reach is on Premiere Networks’ conservative talk radio lineup. He may not be as popular as Rush Limbaugh, but to a lot of people, I’d bet seeing him talk about sports in 2025 is as strange as seeing Limbaugh on ESPN was in 2003. Travis and OutKick are synonymous, so it makes sense that the brand identity makes that transition right along with its founder.
Barstool can do things for FOX that Clay Travis and OutKick can’t. That’s no shade to anyone involved. Barstool can deliver a P1 audience that very few others can.
If we’re saying that OutKick is a “loser” in this deal, it’s only because we’re shocked. FOX chose to focus on benefits instead of costs. I don’t think I’m the only one that will say “I didn’t see that coming,” and I don’t think we’d be talking this way if the network announced that a new OutKick show was sliding into the vacant morning slot on FS1.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.


