Home Blog Page 63

92.5 WXTU’s Nicole Michalik Discusses Crossing Over From Pop to Country

Bethany Kent
-
0
92.5 WXTU’s Nicole Michalik Discusses Crossing Over From Pop to Country

Nicole Michalik has spent more than two decades on Philadelphia airwaves. She built her name as “Nik the Web Chick” at Q102, then reinvented herself as “Nik the Country Chick” at 92.5 WXTU. Today she hosts afternoon drive at XTU, middays on Country 102.5 in Boston, interviews country’s biggest stars, and still can’t resist a good pop culture moment.

I know Nicole from the other side of the dial. In the early 2010s, I worked at Wired 96.5 (WRDW) while she was at our competitor Q102. Clients raved about her constantly. We’d shake our fists about it back then, only half joking. We’ve become friendly over the years as many radio competitors seem to do in our small industry. I am always impressed by her hustle, fun spirit, and timely social media content.

The Secret to Client Loyalty

Nicole credits both timing and personality. Tim Herbster created the “Nik the Web Chick” concept at Q102, blending on-air work with website and social media before anyone else in Philly radio tried it. “No one in radio was doing digital and social like Q102 back then,” she said. “I am still so proud of what we created, that alone was fresh and different.” She describes herself as “a very passionate individual who is an open book and truly thinks of everyone as her friend.” Gratitude matters just as much to her. “I always understand how fortunate we are to have clients continue to advertise with us,” she said, “so I always [let] them know how much I appreciated them choosing me.”

From Top 40 to Country Without Losing Herself

The jump to country radio worried her at first. “I don’t hunt or fish or drink out of a red solo cup,” she admitted. Former VP of Country Programming David Corey gave her simple advice: “We want you to be you, everything else will fall into place.” That confidence stuck with her. “That gave me the confidence to not stress about being someone I wasn’t,” she said. Her take on radio itself is simple: “Radio is a mainstream community based listening experience.”

A Pop Girl Who Found a Country Home

Nicole openly admits she’s a Swiftie at heart, so I asked if country listeners ever pushed back on that. Her answer: “No (knock on wood)!” She points to authenticity as the reason. “If I’m talking about something funny or personal, like my package got delivered to wrong address or how I lost weight, I think people [feel] like they can relate to me,” she said. She’s watched plenty of her old Q102 fans follow her into country music entirely. “I’ve been saying for many years that country is the new Hot AC,” she said. “It’s honestly a very easy transition from Top 40 to Country.”

Earning the Trust of a New Format

Recently retired WXTU program director Razz told her not to expect overnight results. “It’s okay that some things don’t happen overnight,” he told her. “Just be yourself.” Nicole leaned into learning the artists, the labels, and the music itself. “I am a very passionate person, so when I’m into something, I can’t really hide it,” she said. That passion later earned her the CRS New Face of Country Music title. She’s especially vocal about Parker McCollum’s self-titled album, which won ACM Album of the Year, and Ella Langley’s “Dandelion,” which she compares directly to Kacey Musgraves’ “Golden Hour.” Of Luke Combs, she said simply: “I’m obsessed.”

A DM From Kane Brown

Nicole’s favorite Nashville memory started with a mispronounced word. Kane Brown co-hosted her show during her first XTU summer, and the two stayed in touch. Last December, he messaged her on Instagram, annoyed that another host kept botching a contest keyword. “That’s hilarious,” she told him, before inviting him and his wife, Katelyn, to call into the show. “He said, ‘Of course!'” The two talked for over ten minutes on air, and Brown spilled the tea about what his next single “Woman” would be like months before release. “Like who does that?” she said. “It was just so cool and real and made such an impact on me and our listeners.”

Radio’s Comeback Pitch

Nicole believes radio needs a marketing reset, not a eulogy. “If vinyl records can have a sexy comeback so can radio,” she said. Her pitch: a unified, industry-wide campaign in the spirit of “Milk: Does a Body Good” or “Pork: The Other White Meat,” selling radio as a whole rather than station by station. “On air personalities were the original influencers,” she said. Her closing argument is direct: “I believe we can make a comeback.”

9/11 and a Lesson in Connection

At the very beginning of her career, Nicole had an Epic Records internship in New York City. Her first day at work in New York City was September 11, 2001. “It still seems surreal,” she said. The next day, Q102’s “Chio in the Morning” put her on air to share what she’d witnessed. “I remember that so vividly, thinking wow, it’s important to share all the ups and downs of your life with your listeners,” she said, “because that is how you build connection.”

Life Beyond the Booth

Nicole has stayed busy outside radio, too, from “The Biggest Loser” to co-hosting “The Q” on Fox29 to an off-Broadway run in “Gilbert Gottfried Presents: The Diet Show.” She traces it back to childhood. “From when I was 3 I would perform ‘Twas the Night Before Christmas’ on my Aunt’s mantel in July,” she said. “I would get in trouble at school for talking all the time.” Every new opportunity still excites her. “So the more connections that I make and the more opportunities that come my way, I’m down!”

Honoring Her Father Through Advocacy

Nicole’s father was diagnosed with Parkinson’s at 44. “He was the best,” she said. “He passed August 2023 and fought like hell with humor and grace for almost 30 years.” Her work with The Parkinson Council grew directly from that loss. “Being involved in The Parkinson Council was the least I could [do] for him and other patients,” she said. She also supports the Women’s Veterans Center in Philadelphia whenever her schedule allows.

Hallmark Dreams Still in Progress

A fun fact about Nicole is that she has written roughly eight Hallmark-style treatments, complete with titles, characters, and full storylines. “Not to toot my own horn, but I really think they are good,” she said. She hasn’t landed a meeting with the network yet but stays hopeful. “I love love,” she said. “It’s never come easy for me, but I do believe in love. So maybe part of it is me manifesting it for myself?”

What Comes Next

Nicole’s dream has stayed consistent since childhood. “My dream was to always have my own talk show,” she said, pointing to “The Breakfast Club” and Bobby Bones as proof a radio-digital-TV hybrid can work. “I would like to grow my platform to be able to help more people as well.”

Paying It Forward

As of late, I have been ending all my features with this ask of the subject to spotlight others in our industry that they feel are deserving. I knew Nicole would deliver. When asked who deserves recognition in the industry, Nicole named the people who shaped her career: Brian Bridgman, JT Bosch, Rick Vaughn, Tim Herbster, Razz, and Justin Chase. She also credited Roula Christie, Charlie Maxx, and Andie Summers as close friends and “total radio badasses” who continue to inspire her.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Discovery Channel’s Shark Week Holds a Radio Strategy Secret

Keith Cunningham
-
0
Discovery Channel’s Shark Week Holds a Radio Strategy Secret

You’ve heard of Shark Week. It kicks off again this Sunday on Discovery Channel. Every RockTernative brand needs a Shark Week — a predictable, branded, loud moment listeners look forward to every year or quarter.

Don’t look at Shark Week as just a TV show on a network — or a series of shows — but as a creative spark that grew into one of the most powerful programming benchmarks in history. It is also the longest-running event in television history. Sharks may be the star, but the anticipation and cult-like fan base turned the benchmark into a brand of its own.

Now going into its 38th year, it all started during a barroom brainstorm. Discovery executives and founder John Hendricks wanted to boost ratings — and one of them wrote “Shark Week” on a napkin, and the rest is history. That goofy idea, born after a few rum and Cokes, can now make or break the year for Discovery Channel. That’s the power of the right benchmark.

One Crazy Idea Can Change Everything

It wasn’t long ago that I posted here about the importance of radical thinking (brainstorming). When was the last time your team did that? Or better yet: when was the last time your team did that and it led to something great on the air? Shark Week is further proof that one crazy idea can become an annual tentpole that pushes a brand to new heights.

We know about big tentpole concerts at RockTernative like iHeart’s Alter Ego, KROQ’s Almost Acoustic Christmas, and epic shows of the past like BFD, Mistletoe Jam, Not So Silent Night. Those are great, but they’re also difficult to pull off. And those are events — not roll-up-your-sleeves, nuts-and-bolts programming.

Creating anticipated benchmarks is something brands of all sizes and types do — from media to fast food to retail. They don’t need to last a week. In fact, they can run two weeks, a month, or even one day like 7-Eleven Day. They can also be limited engagements like the McRib or Pumpkin Spice Lattes.

Why RockTernative Needs Its Own Version

For RockTernative, staging a barroom brainstorm and finding the right version of Shark Week makes business sense because it can bring:

  • Noise and attention
  • New cume
  • Additional listening appointments
  • New revenue streams
  • Repeatable and archivable content
  • Ownership of something important and specific

Nothing knocks down the “boring” and “predictable” complaints like something new and meaningful. Whether as a programmer, consultant, or even when I’m driving morning shows nuts, I’ve always believed in the importance of busting out of the norm. The goal is to create compelling campaign benchmarks that can serve both P1s and Cume — powerful moments of programming creativity that drive real anticipation and brand identity.

RockTernative brands have historically experimented with Zeptember, Rocktober, AC/DCember, and Maytallica. Yes, those can sound cheesy and are sometimes mocked — but it’s not the name that matters; it’s the benefit offered that counts. There are several ways to turn Rocktober from a cliché name into something P1s and Cume both love.

Think Bigger Than the Song Spike

There are also many smaller benchmarks like Mandatory Metallica, Rock Blocks, the Flashback Lunch, or even the ’80s at 8 or ’90s at 9 — but none of them are Shark Week. They’re simply not big enough, or loud enough.

The spirit here is building something bigger and bolder — something more special than the tried-and-true song spikes that disappear as quickly as they arrive. Shark Week works because it’s built, engineered, and marketed — and it becomes anticipated, a brand signature. It’s not the usual fare.

At your next barroom brainstorm, music ideas will probably fill the most napkins, and that’s fine. But also encourage your team to think beyond just music. Consider Beer Week, Manuary, Sextember mornings, Beach Week, Top 10 Month, even stunts. Only you and your team know what can work best for your brand or market — but keep advertisers in mind. What would they want to be a part of? What would they want to renew every year?

Your Brand’s Moment Is Waiting

Over the next week, when you see or hear something about Shark Week, think about how great it will be when your brand builds its next version of can’t-miss programming — and the listeners and advertisers are buzzing about your station.

Every RockTernative brand needs a Shark Week. The question is: what will yours be?

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries.

New Game Lets Radio Pros Win the Ratings War

Mike Stern
-
0
New Game Lets Radio Pros Win the Ratings War

Everyone who has worked in radio for any length of time has, at one point or another, looked at the decisions made by a station’s management team and thought, “I could do better.” Now, with the release of the new game Airwave Empire, we all finally get our chance.

I recently got served an ad on Instagram — way to go, algorithm — for the newly released game and had to investigate. The link took me to a home page that greeted me with a challenge: “Can you win the ratings war?” The splash page also said I would get to “build radio stations, fight for listeners, and crush the competition.” But of course, it had me at “ratings war.”

Curious to learn more, I reached out to Brian Shrader, who built the game. Ironically, it turns out that Airwave Empire is the brainchild of someone who works in television. “As a kid I fell headlong into a love of radio,” he says. “I was fortunate enough at fifteen to get a job at a little local radio station and just loved it. Since then, even though I moved into television, I’ve always kept up with the industry.”

That lifelong obsession also led to the belief that media — and more specifically radio — was a great framework for a game. He started developing a board game based on the industry more than a decade ago. Then technology caught up to his vision. “With the miracle of AI coding I thought ‘wow I could turn this into a realistic simulation of radio.'”

From Vision to Vibe Coding

Using an agent for vibe coding, he was able to develop the framework of Airwave Empire in just a few weeks. However, he emphasizes it wasn’t as simple as it might sound. “Vibe coding is powerful, but it still requires a human guide. I didn’t just say, hey, create a radio game and it spit all this out. I have spent hours and hours on this and I still spend three or four hours a day getting the game into the form you see today.”

That form gives players the opportunity to do everything that goes into running a radio station — like choosing target demographics, making format decisions, hiring and firing talent, budgeting for marketing, and even managing sales — so that hopefully your station is profitable.

Delving Into the Past

An interesting facet of the game is that players can run stations in different eras. It starts around 1970, which Shrader sees as one of the most interesting times for the industry. “That felt like the most accessible start for the game because it’s where you really begin to have the specialization of formats,” he explains. “One of my favorite scenarios to play is where you’re the middle of the road heritage station who has this big audience facing more specialized competition as the decade goes on. You have to decide, ‘what are we going to do?'”

It’s important to note that the gameplay, even back to 1970, is based on actual market conditions and history. These aren’t made-up stations in an imaginary town. Gameplay takes place in cities we all know, built on top of a base of historical radio data.

Shrader credits David Gleason’s World Radio History site, which he describes as having “tons of archival material.” That includes Duncan’s American Radio, which chronicles the ratings of American radio stations. “They laid the groundwork. Jim Duncan did the research, painstakingly compiling those ratings histories. Through David’s website I was able to access it all, and that really provides the foundation for how the game works.”

Coming Back to the Future

As the game progresses through different eras, changes in the industry are reflected accordingly. “The way that the game is developed, the FCC ownership regulations match the time. It gradually loosens to what we have today,” explains Shrader.

With the coming of the Telecomm Act and consolidation, players will face off against bigger companies that are consolidating their holdings. Some might even sound familiar. “As you get into the mid and late 90s there are some companies, for example Clearwave and Nimbus, that begin buying up your competitors.”

That puts players in the role of the stand-alone local broadcaster, but maybe not forever. “Right now, you’re playing in one market and can own whatever the cap is at the time,” he says. “You can’t, in the current iteration of the game, then go to another market and buy stations. But that is on the roadmap.”

Streaming, Revenue, and the Road Ahead

Beyond ownership changes, players who choose more modern eras will also encounter changing technology. “When you get to 2005 in the game, you can start investing in streaming, which could eventually show up in the ratings and make you some money. But it’s not going to replace what you were making from your terrestrial broadcast.”

Also true to challenges the industry faces, available revenues start to decline as players operate stations through the 2000s and beyond. “You’re going to have to make some decisions,” promises Shrader. “As the local broadcaster, are you willing to accept a 5% profit margin on your FM station? Or maybe your FM station is doing well, but you’ve got an AM station that you are emotionally attached to, so you’re willing to subsidize it with the FM’s profits. That’s all up to you.”

Digging Into the Details

Running a radio station in the game isn’t just about surface-level decisions. It gets into the nitty-gritty. The ratings are broken down into different demos, so players can obsess about gaining and losing numbers in small demographic slices from one ratings book to the next — just like real Program Directors.

“It’s not as simple as just deciding to do album rock and cutting it loose,” Shrader says. “You have to really nail down what you want to do.” That includes everything from negotiating talent contracts to deciding on spot loads and more. Additionally, players can generate their own station logos, create jingles, and invest in having a station van if they choose. “Not only does a van look cool, but it does boost your promotional efforts. You’ll get a little extra mileage out of whatever you set your promotion budget at.”

Another feature that mirrors how the industry changed over time is the option not to have live, local talent in every daypart. “Early on you have automation available. Then in the mid-nineties you can start voice tracking.” But just like in real life, the audience will respond to those choices. “They’re going to be more likely to connect with real talent over automation, but they might be more willing to accept voice trackers.”

Mornings Still Matter

Furthermore, mornings remain the most important daypart. Shrader says the simulation gives extra weight to mornings in determining the overall success of the station. “You’re allowed to pick how much you want to invest in the sound of the station and which dayparts to focus on. So, once you get mornings doing well, then you can start working on other dayparts. But you’ve got to have a good morning show or you’re probably going to struggle.”

Every decision you make in the game has consequences for your station, especially the bad ones. “I’ve enjoyed coming up with stuff that affects morale,” Shrader says. “If the station’s ratings are sliding, the staff starts to lose faith in management, and they become harder to retain.”

And if all else fails, players can get outside help. “You can commission a research report that goes really in depth into what’s going on in the market,” he says. “It also provides specifics for your station, looks at who your competitors are, and how they are positioned.”

Finding the Game’s Target Audience

Shrader says he expects the main audience for the game will be radio industry folks, but there are also a number of people who play simulation and business strategy games like this for industries they aren’t part of. He’s hoping to eventually catch their attention as well.

“For the radio people, who hasn’t thought ‘what if I had the keys to this place? How would it turn out?'” Shrader says. “Well, now you can find out and potentially lose imaginary money if you run it into the ground.”

And for anyone who does decide to play, Shrader says feedback is welcome, especially from people who are in the business. “If they have any ideas or suggestions I hope that they’ll take the time to send me a note because I really do want to make this the most realistic radio station management simulation possible.”

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

How Cirocast Grew Out of Skyview Networks’ 30-Year Heritage

Garrett Searight
-
0
How Cirocast Grew Out of Skyview Networks’ 30-Year Heritage

Skyview Networks is positioning Cirocast as the answer to one of radio’s most pressing infrastructure questions, and the timing couldn’t be more relevant. The cloud-native audio distribution platform gives broadcasters a way to modernize without abandoning the legacy systems that still keep hundreds of stations on the air. With regulatory changes reshaping the satellite landscape, Skyview Networks believes it has built something the industry didn’t know it needed until now — but clearly does.

That belief comes straight from the top. Sarah Foss, Chief Transformation Officer at Skyview Networks, has watched the industry’s reaction to recent announcements about the platform and the team behind it.

“I think it’s really exciting, what we’re doing across the board,” Foss said. Feedback from clients, she added, has been overwhelming since news of promotions and additions at the company started circulating.

For Foss, the excitement isn’t just about a new product. It’s about a company willing to challenge its own legacy.

“When you consider we’re taking all of this legacy and heritage and saying, ‘Wait, you can do it better now,'” she said, “you can do it better.” That mindset, she explained, has always driven her approach to the industry — pushing technology forward and creating business opportunity by thinking smarter rather than simply working harder.

Aaron Mellis, Senior Vice President of Technology at Skyview Networks and the lead developer of Cirocast, offers a more clinical breakdown of what the platform actually does.

“It’s a cloud-native audio distribution system,” Mellis said, built primarily to serve national and regional rights holders. That group includes sports teams, national networks, and small syndicated shows alike.

Three forces converged to create the need, according to Mellis: C-band regulatory changes recently approved for a July 2027 auction, a radio station environment reshaped by consolidation and shifting downlink access, and uneven infrastructure reliability across the country.

Filling a Gap the Industry Didn’t Know Existed

Those three pressures pushed Skyview Networks toward a product nobody else had built.

“We didn’t see anything available to service that need, so we developed it ourselves,” Mellis said. Because affiliate needs vary so widely, flexibility became a design priority from the start. Some stations are ready to lean fully into virtual environments, while others still depend on rack-based equipment to deliver their programming.

Foss pointed to a workforce reality that makes that flexibility essential. Fewer broadcast engineers and technical experts staff stations today than in years past, even as listener demand hasn’t budged.

“Cirocast is giving the broadcaster the optionality Aaron mentioned,” Foss said, particularly for facilities that have consolidated or lost dedicated technical staff. Consequently, stations can redirect scarce technical talent toward keeping their product reaching listeners effectively.

Monetization gaps in existing solutions also shaped the platform’s development. Prior cloud delivery mechanisms and hardware-based distribution options simply lacked the financial tools clients needed, according to Mellis. That gap became another driver behind Cirocast’s build-out. Meanwhile, Skyview Networks leaned on three decades of relationships with rights holders and broadcasters to identify exactly where those gaps existed.

“That’s been part of Skyview Networks’ heritage,” the lead Cirocast developer shared, with Skyview Networks spending three decades working with clients to find and fix distribution shortfalls.

That heritage, according to Foss, is precisely what makes broadcasters trust the pitch.

“We’re using Cirocast ourselves,” the Skyview Networks Chief Transformation Officer shared, and that internal adoption carries weight with clients. Trust built over 30 years doesn’t disappear overnight, she noted, and it gives the company credibility when it tells broadcasters which direction to move.

A Fixed Deadline Changes Everything

Development wasn’t a quick process. Mellis described roughly two to three years spent evaluating existing technology before realizing the features clients actually needed simply didn’t exist yet. Along the way, a subset of satellite affiliates lost local downlink capability, forcing Skyview Networks to adapt in real time. Partner feedback, he said, proved essential to refining the platform as challenges surfaced.

Until Wednesday, though, uncertainty lingered over the whole rollout.

Foss described the transition as “a moving target” ahead of today’s regulatory vote, since broadcasters didn’t know how the FCC and government would support the shift. Some clients wanted clarity on integration timelines; others simply wanted to know when they needed to act. Now that a firm date exists, Foss expects the industry to move with far more confidence.

That doesn’t mean broadcasters should wait until the deadline nears. Skyview Networks has already migrated some networks onto Cirocast, and more transitions are planned for later this year and into early 2027.

“The sooner you get ahead of that transition, the better,” Mellis said, given how disruptive sudden change can be across hundreds of stations. A transition period follows the 2027 auction, so the shift won’t happen overnight — but preparation now still matters enormously.

Foss urged every broadcaster to start mapping out its own rollout strategy immediately. Business resilience, staffing plans, and installation timing all factor into that planning, she explained. Stations can’t pause service simply to install new equipment, so coordination matters as much as the technology itself.

Fortunately, Cirocast’s phased approach means networks don’t need to cut everything over at once, according to Mellis. That flexibility already shows up in how early adopters have used the platform.

This spring, Skyview Networks onboarded its first group of networks, and those installations have run smoothly for months. Additional partners are slated for fall and early 2027 migrations, with implementation covering everything from raising station awareness to placing equipment and finally migrating traffic. Given how differently support needs vary from market to market, Mellis said the company remains committed to accommodating each affiliate’s pace.

As the July 2027 deadline approaches, Skyview Networks appears confident it’s built more than just a stopgap solution. Cirocast represents a bet that cloud-native distribution, paired with decades of broadcaster relationships, can carry the industry through a genuinely disruptive regulatory shift. For now, both Foss and Mellis seem focused on the same goal — helping as many stations as possible get ahead of the curve before the cliff arrives.

Radio Companies Can’t Quit YouTube, Even If They Want To

Garrett Searight
-
0
Radio Companies Can’t Quit YouTube, Even If They Want To

Few platforms create as much tension for media companies as YouTube does right now. It’s the tool nearly every programmer needs and, at the same time, the competitor nobody in radio can afford to ignore. That tension isn’t going away anytime soon, and honestly, it shouldn’t.

I’ve spent four years at Barrett Media banging the YouTube drum louder than almost anyone else in this industry. If your company doesn’t have a real YouTube strategy, you basically don’t exist to listeners under 40. That’s not an exaggeration. Nobody I know has such a massive audience that they can shrug off an entire generation of potential viewers and listeners.

But here’s the uncomfortable part. YouTube isn’t just a distribution platform for radio and podcasting content anymore — it’s a full-blown advertising juggernaut, and it’s eating into dollars that used to belong to traditional broadcasters. Consequently, every hour a station spends building out its YouTube presence is also an hour spent feeding a competitor’s growth.

The numbers make the stakes impossible to ignore. YouTube pulled in $11.1 billion in advertising revenue in a single quarter. Radio, meanwhile, is projected to generate roughly $9 billion for the entire year. Read that again. One platform’s three-month haul outpaces an entire industry’s annual take. That gap should worry every executive currently celebrating a strong quarter of YouTube subscriber growth.

The Double Bind Nobody Talks About

This is a genuine damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don’t situation. Skip YouTube entirely, and you lose relevance with younger audiences along with any shot at supplemental revenue. Use YouTube aggressively, though, and you’re handing the platform more watch time, more engagement data, and more ammunition to show advertisers just how dominant it’s become.

Meanwhile, YouTube doesn’t have to lift a finger to benefit from this dynamic. Every clip a station uploads, every talk show segment repurposed for the platform, and every podcast simulcast adds to a pool of content that keeps users on YouTube longer. That extended watch time then gets sold right back to the advertisers radio companies are also chasing. It’s a remarkably efficient system, and it isn’t built for broadcasters’ benefit.

Still, walking away isn’t realistic. Therefore, the smarter approach treats YouTube as a “13th month” — a supplemental revenue stream rather than a primary one. Stations that lean on YouTube dollars to pad their budgets, without restructuring their entire business around the platform, tend to come out ahead. Those that treat YouTube as a savior, on the other hand, often end up disappointed when the algorithm shifts or ad rates soften.

Winning Battles Without Winning the War

So, what does a healthy relationship with YouTube actually look like? It starts with acknowledging you’ll probably never win the overall revenue war. YouTube’s scale, reach, and ad infrastructure are simply too large for any single radio company to match. Once executives accept that reality, they can stop chasing an unwinnable fight and start focusing on smaller, winnable ones.

That means using YouTube deliberately — for audience discovery, for younger-demo relevance, for supplemental ad dollars — without pretending it’s a replacement for a station’s core business. It also means diversifying revenue instead of over-indexing on a single platform that ultimately answers to its own shareholders, not to radio’s.

Additionally, companies need to keep investing in the things YouTube can’t replicate: local relationships, live event activations, direct advertiser partnerships, and the kind of community trust that doesn’t show up in a subscriber count. Those advantages won’t disappear overnight, but they will erode if broadcasters let YouTube define the entire strategy.

Ultimately, treating YouTube as both friend and foe isn’t a contradiction. It’s just an honest read of where the industry stands today. Ignore the platform, and irrelevance creeps in. Overinvest in it, and you’re just fattening a competitor’s stats sheet. Somewhere in between sits the smartest path forward, and the companies that find it will be the ones still standing when the next platform disruption arrives.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Paramount Skydance/Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Delayed Again by Judge

Garrett Searight
-
0
Paramount Skydance/Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Delayed Again by Judge

Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery will remain separated for now. A federal judge has extended the pause on their proposed merger.

What We Know: U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín extended a temporary restraining order blocking the transaction for another two weeks. The extension means Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery cannot close their deal before at least Aug. 17. The judge said the additional time will allow both sides to establish a schedule for the ongoing legal proceedings. She cited unresolved issues surrounding two preliminary injunction motions, the hearing format, and the companies’ willingness to follow the existing restrictions. Additionally, the judge ordered Paramount, the state attorneys general involved in the case, and the Writers Guild of America to meet and discuss a path forward. The parties must submit a joint report on those discussions by July 24.

What’s At Stake: Paramount has requested a three-day evidentiary hearing as the judge considers whether to issue a preliminary injunction. Such an order could significantly delay the merger while the legal process continues. The WGA has separately challenged the transaction, arguing against the combination. The group will participate in the scheduled Aug. 3 hearing.

What Remains Unclear: It remains uncertain whether the involved parties can reach an agreement on a timeline for future proceedings. The judge noted she cannot extend the temporary restraining order beyond its current limits unless both sides agree to continue the restrictions.

What It Means: The Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery merger faces another legal hurdle. However, the deal remains active as the companies prepare for the next court hearing and attempt to move the process forward.

Former ESPN Host Mike Hill: Consumers Need To Stop Blaming ESPN For Changes

John Mamola
-
0
Former ESPN Host Mike Hill: Consumers Need To Stop Blaming ESPN For Changes

Mike Hill isn’t pointing fingers at ESPN. Instead, the former ESPN host, who now is with FOX Sports, says viewers created the mess themselves.

What We Know: Hill joined ESPN in 2004 and spent nine years at the network, exiting in 2013. During that run, he hosted SportsCenter, NFL Live, First Take and Baseball Tonight. Since leaving ESPN, Hill has been with FOX Sports as part of the network’s coverage with the NFL, college sports, and MLB. This week, ESPN carried out fresh layoffs tied to its NFL Network integration. Following the cuts, many decried the direction of ESPN in recent times. Hill took to social media, arguing fans share the blame for the network’s direction.

What They Said: Mike Hill (via X): “I see a lot of people longing for the glory days of ESPN. I agree but stop blaming the network. Many of YOU bought into exactly what it is today! In fact, what sports overall has become. A bunch of arguing, hot takes & debate. These networks look at ratings, and if you’re out there chewing on that red meat they’re serving, that’s what they will continue to serve you.”

Mike Hill (via X): “When a good, quality, entertaining, yet solid show comes on the air, it’s not supported! Our brains have been reprogrammed! It’s like getting hooked on cocaine. Once you do that, weed ain’t really gonna give you that feeling you used to have with it. If you want to change things, change your habits, The networks and streamers will buy into what you’re actually buying. It’s time to go to rehab!”

What Remains Unclear: Hill didn’t name specific shows or executives in either post. Still, it’s unclear whether he directed his comments at this week’s layoffs or sports media broadly.

What It Means: Hill’s remarks flip the usual script on media criticism. Rather than blaming executives, he points at audience behavior driving programming choices. It’s an interesting point of view due to the fact that networks are always chasing what the audience desires. While layoffs are never easy with any company, criticism should be the expectation. However, in Hill’s case, pointing the finger at the consumer for change could provoke further engagement on the topic. Ultimately, his message suggests real change starts with viewers, not networks.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

93 WIBC News Director John Herrick Exits

Garrett Searight
-
1
93 WIBC News Director John Herrick Exits

John Herrick is exiting his role at 93 WIBC. The Indianapolis station’s News Director is departing after nearly a decade with the outlet.

What We Know: John Herrick joined 93 WIBC in 2017 and steadily built a reputation as a trusted voice in Indianapolis news/talk radio. Station leadership promoted him to News Director in March 2023, a role he’s held for a little over three years. During his tenure, Herrick oversaw the newsroom’s day-to-day coverage and helped shape the station’s editorial direction. His departure closes out a run that spanned more than eight years at 93 WIBC. As of now, the station hasn’t announced a permanent replacement or outlined next steps for the news department.

What They Said: “I am proud of the work we accomplished and the stories we were able to tell on behalf of our listeners. I especially appreciate the trust and support of the people who welcomed us into their lives through our reporting. While this chapter has come to an end, I remain committed to the values that have guided my career: serving the public, pursuing the truth, and treating people with fairness and respect. I want to thank my colleagues, mentors, friends, and family–especially my wife and sons–for their support throughout this journey. I look forward to what comes next and the opportunity to continue contributing meaningful work.” -John Herrick

What Remains Unclear: Herrick hasn’t disclosed his next move. It’s unclear whether he’ll stay in Indianapolis or pursue opportunities elsewhere. The circumstances surrounding his exit haven’t been detailed publicly either. Meanwhile, 93 WIBC hasn’t named an interim or permanent successor to lead the newsroom.

What It Means: Herrick’s exit represents a notable shift for 93 WIBC‘s news operation. Newsrooms often lean on institutional knowledge during transitions, so his absence could test the team’s depth. Additionally, the move underscores ongoing turnover across local news/talk radio, where leadership changes have become increasingly common. Ultimately, how quickly 93 WIBC fills the role will shape its editorial continuity going forward.

Anthony Cumia: Howard Stern’s Struggling Due to American Culture Shifts

Garrett Searight
-
3
Anthony Cumia: Howard Stern’s Struggling Due to American Culture Shifts

Anthony Cumia has weighed in on Howard Stern’s declining relevance. The former Opie and Anthony co-host says shock radio’s era has passed.

What We Know: Cumia’s comments arrive as Stern prepares to reduce his SiriusXM show to a single new episode per week. The scaled-back schedule marks a significant shift for a program that once anchored terrestrial and satellite radio for decades. Cumia, who built his own career alongside Gregg “Opie” Hughes in a rival shock jock format, offered a blunt assessment of why that style no longer resonates. His remarks touch on both the legal landscape and shifting cultural appetites. Because the genre relied heavily on shock value, he argues its foundation has eroded. Consequently, he suggests Stern’s format has become a relic of a bygone media era.

What They Said: “Times change. A lot of the stuff that Stern was doing and Opie and Anthony were doing isn’t viable anymore, legally. It’s not viable. Also, as far as society goes, it’s not what people are really looking for. Boobies. Heinies. Vaginas. It was titillating and shocking, hence the shock jock. But how shocking could a guy be talking about boobies when you could watch the hardest of hardcore porn right there on your phone? You’re not shocking anyone with, ‘Oh my god, she just took her bra off, Robin.’ It’s a different world. So it has taken its toll on the Stern show.” -Anthony Cumia

What Remains Unclear: Cumia didn’t specify whether he believes Stern’s reduced schedule stems directly from declining relevance or from broader business considerations at SiriusXM. Nor did he address how Stern himself might respond to the critique. It’s uncertain whether other former shock jocks share this view publicly.

What It Means: Cumia’s critique highlights a larger industry reckoning with content that once defined an entire radio format. As internet access normalized explicit content, radio’s shock value diminished sharply. Meanwhile, legal and regulatory pressures have further narrowed what’s permissible on air. Together, these forces have reshaped audience expectations, leaving hosts like Stern to navigate a landscape where their signature approach simply doesn’t land the way it used to.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

Dan Patrick: ESPN Should “Show More Dignity” With Layoffs Approach

John Mamola
-
1
Dan Patrick: ESPN Should “Show More Dignity” With Layoffs Approach

Dan Patrick spoke out Thursday following the latest round of layoffs by ESPN. In his response, Patrick admitted ESPN is not the same as he remembers from working there.

What We Know: ESPN cut several on-air names this week, including Karl Ravech and Ryan Clark. Ravech, a 33-year company veteran, reportedly heard the news from a reporter rather than a boss. Clark, meanwhile, learned of his exit while appearing live on NFL Live. Patrick addressed both situations on Thursday’s Dan Patrick Show and says that the network needs to show more dignity with how they approach their layoffs.

What They Said: (All quotes via The Dan Patrick Show)

Dan Patrick on ESPN’s latest round of layoffs: “There’s a lot of people who lost jobs. I hate seeing that in the industry. The only thing that I would say is show dignity to those people in how you let them go. That’s all.”

Dan Patrick on Karl Ravech finding out he got let go by a reporter: “That really bothered because you can be better than that. It’s a tough conversation to have. Bring them in, call them, go see them, zoom with them. 33 years, and you don’t you find out from somebody else other than your boss. That’s a shame. I felt really bad for Carl Ravech. Had a great run, but that’s not how you should be told that your services are no longer needed.”

Dan Patrick on ESPN being different today than when he was there: “It’s not the ESPN that I worked at or grew up with being a part of. But they’re very successful in how they do it. I would tell people if you’re going to go into this business, it’s hard to go into the business and say that is going to be my job forever. I would I would encourage you to be open-minded. Have your head on a swivel. The chances are it won’t be your last job.”

What Remains Unclear: The full scope of ESPN’s layoffs is unknown.

What It Means: Patrick’s remarks add a prominent voice to growing criticism of ESPN’s layoff process. Meanwhile, his comments highlight a cultural shift at the network since his own departure over two decades ago. For talent across the industry, the message is clear: job security remains fragile. Still, Patrick encouraged newcomers to stay adaptable rather than discouraged.

Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.

1...626364...2,756Page 63 of 2,756