MSNBC is rebranding as MS NOW, and the change feels like more than just a new logo and color scheme.
The network is calling this the start of a new chapter, one rooted in ten guiding principles — integrity, accuracy, fairness, opinion, sources, emerging technologies, perspectives, transparency, independence, and “Who We Are.”
That’s a strong list. But the question is whether it’s a mission statement or marketing copy. MSNBC’s future will depend on which one it turns out to be.
If you only get one chance to make a first impression, then the next few weeks may define MS NOW’s legacy before it even gets started. The cable news audience has changed dramatically in the last decade, and not necessarily in MSNBC’s favor. The network’s average viewer age is among the oldest in television news, and younger audiences are increasingly getting their headlines from TikTok, YouTube, or podcasts — not 24-hour cable channels.
If this rebrand is supposed to signal renewal, it needs to actually feel new.
That’s easier said than done for a network known as the liberal counterweight to Fox News. MSNBC has spent years cultivating a loyal audience that expects a certain tone, perspective, and cast of characters. The network’s lineup is filled with opinion hosts who rarely cross ideological lines. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that — it’s a proven formula for cable news. But if MS NOW is serious about fairness, transparency, and independence, can it still be the home for only one side of the political aisle?
It’s a tricky balance. On one hand, MSNBC can’t alienate the viewers who already trust it as the left’s main television destination. On the other, you can’t credibly claim to be guided by principles like fairness and perspective while framing almost every story through a single partisan lens. That’s the kind of contradiction audiences sniff out quickly — and one that could make or break MS NOW’s credibility.
The rebrand could also be an opportunity to modernize how the network delivers news. The inclusion of “emerging technologies” as one of its core principles is telling. Does that mean more streaming content? A push into social video? Or just another way to describe a refreshed website and app? If MS NOW wants to connect with younger viewers, it needs to meet them where they are — on platforms that don’t require a cable subscription.
Still, branding alone can’t change perception. CNN’s much-hyped “This Is CNN” reboot didn’t move the needle because the product never truly changed. The anchors were the same, the tone was the same, and the coverage felt identical. Viewers saw through it. MSNBC will face the same challenge. A sleek new identity means nothing if the same talking points and personalities dominate the air.
To its credit, MSNBC’s emphasis on values like accuracy and transparency should be applauded. In a media environment where trust is hard to come by, those principles matter. But the network must also ask itself whether it’s willing to challenge its own audience.
Can MS NOW hold Democrats accountable with the same energy it uses on Republicans? Can it give airtime to voices that don’t always fit comfortably within its brand? If the answer is no, then “Who We Are” becomes a slogan instead of a standard.
The timing of this shift is significant. The 2024 election aftermath, ongoing political polarization, and declining cable ratings all create pressure to adapt.
MSNBC doesn’t just need to refresh its image — it needs to redefine its purpose. If MS NOW is truly about journalistic integrity and independence, then it should strive to be more than a political echo chamber.
Ultimately, rebrands are promises. They tell viewers what to expect. MS NOW is promising a newsroom built on fairness, transparency, and perspective. Living up to that will take more than a new logo and mission statement. It will take editorial courage — and a willingness to rethink what MSNBC has been for the past two decades.
Whether this is a fresh start or just fresh paint, we’ll find out soon enough.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. To stay updated, sign up for our newsletters and get the latest information delivered straight to your inbox.

Garrett Searight is Barrett Media’s News Editor, which includes writing daily news stories, features, and opinion columns. He joined Barrett Media in 2022 after a decade leading several radio brands in several formats, as well as a 5-year stint working in local television. In addition to his work with Barrett Media, he is a radio and TV play-by-play broadcaster. Reach out to him at Garrett@BarrettMedia.com.



“if MS NOW is serious about fairness, transparency, and independence, can it still be the home for only one side of the political aisle?”. Actually yes, if the partisan lean is actually the truth in what’s happening. Don’t confuse opinion with news…which is truth and honesty. Ask the same question of Fox News…is Fox serious about fairness, transparency, and independence, can it still be the home for only one side of the political aisle?”. We know that answer. If you call yourself news, there is no partisan side. Seems Fox is already breaking that rule. News is NEWS and by the very nature it is the truth, wether left, right or center!