The fallout from college football commentator Josh Pate’s interview with President Donald Trump has continued following the release of the interview over the weekend. Some sports commentators were skeptical of the approach that Pate would take with the interview, with some of Pate’s loudest critics saying last week he is not the type of commentator that would succeed with an interview with the current President.
The Dan Le Batard Show producer Mike Ryan Ruiz was one of the most vocal critics of Pate’s approval for the interview, and shared his critique of the sit down on Monday’s program. Ryan Ruiz argued that the conversation neither delivered meaningful political insight nor satisfied the expectations of a sports audience that was promised a substantive discussion about college football issues.
“It wasn’t a political discussion. I don’t know how much was edited, but there was one moment where Trump patted himself on the back about the job that he did with Venezuela. But even for Trump, who meanders and rambles a lot, like he didn’t inject a lot of that into the conversation,” said Ryan Ruiz.
Ruiz suggested the interview feel was unusually restrained yet ultimately shallow. He also took issue with what he described as a surprising lack of college football substance, explaining that listeners who tuned in expecting a focused conversation on the sport instead heard what he characterized as an unfocused mix of soft prompts and tangents.
“There also wasn’t college football. It was actually really embarrassing,” said Ryan Ruiz. “There was one soft toss to the President. What would you do about this? He started rambling about how the Gamecocks are good and the NFL kickoff rule. It was just bad.”
Expanding on that criticism, Ruiz cited what he called a misleading pre-interview buildup. He said it positioned the segment around Name, Image, and Likeness policy. However, he argued the final interview shifted toward broader personal reflections. The discussion included questions about how Trump hires staff and lessons from his two presidential terms. It even featured a story about the Lincoln Bedroom. Ruiz contended those topics did not deliver the promised depth on NIL or the sport’s evolving structure.
“There was nothing there in terms of substantial NIL opinion,” Ruiz said, adding that he reviewed what he called a full list of nine questions and concluded the segment functioned more as a profile-raising moment for Pate than a rigorous examination of college football policy intersecting with politics.
Ruiz argued that Donald Trump benefited most from the appearance. He said the former president “got what he wanted, which was a sports platform normalizing him and bringing an audience to Josh Pate.” Ruiz added that the interview “didn’t achieve anything other than that.” His critique reflects a broader concern. He believes political figures increasingly use sports media to reach audiences who may not follow traditional news outlets.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.
