Jesse Watters, Jessica Tarlov, and The Five have been joined at the hip for years now. The dynamic is familiar, loud, and deliberately uncomfortable. It is also wildly successful. That context matters when parsing Watters’ recent comments about how he treats his liberal co-host.
Watters recently acknowledged what most viewers already know. “I do come off condescending, and I’m working on that,” he said. He also cited advice from Brit Hume, noting that he was told to interrupt Jessica Tarlov less because audiences need to hear the other side. Watters added that he has been trying to be more polite.
That all sounds reasonable on the surface. It is also completely unnecessary.
The entire appeal of The Five is rooted in tension. The show is not a polite seminar. It is a daily food fight with ideological guardrails. Every cast member has a role, and Tarlov’s role is clear. She is the resident liberal foil. There’s no doubt that she is the punching bag. She knows it, accepts it, and executes it well.
Importantly, that punching bag punches back. Often. Tarlov is sharp, prepared, and rarely intimidated. She needles Watters as much as he needles her. That back-and-forth is not a flaw in the show. It is the engine. Remove the edge, and you remove the electricity.
Viewers do not tune into The Five for balance in the traditional sense. They tune in for controlled chaos, sparks, and arguments that feel unscripted, even when they are predictable. Jesse Watters leaning into confrontation is not a bug. It is a feature.
There is also the matter of results. The Five is almost always the most-watched show in cable news. Night after night, it beats programs that try much harder to sound reasonable. Success at that level is not accidental. It is the product of chemistry, consistency, and characters staying in their lanes.
Messing with that formula is risky. Audiences are creatures of habit. They like knowing what they are going to get. Watters playing nicer might earn praise from critics, but it would cost the show its bite. Cable news history is littered with examples of executives fixing things that were not broken.
Whether Watters is a “bad person” is an entirely separate debate. That is a cultural conversation, not a programming one. Television is not a morality contest. It is a performance medium. Watters is performing a role that resonates with millions of viewers who know exactly why they are watching.
It is hard to imagine a meaningful portion of the audience saying, “I love The Five, but I stopped watching because they were too mean to that girl I completely disagree with.” That viewer does not exist in large numbers. If anything, the rough edges are the draw.
Watters does not need to change for the content’s sake. He needs to keep doing what helped make The Five dominant in the first place. The tension works. The roles work. The ratings confirm it. Polishing away the friction might make some people feel better, but it would make the show worse.
Barrett Media produces daily content on the music, news, and sports media industries. Sign up for our newsletters to stay updated and get the latest information right in your inbox.
Garrett Searight is Barrett Media’s News Editor, which includes writing daily news stories, features, and opinion columns. He joined Barrett Media in 2022 after a decade leading several radio brands in several formats, as well as a 5-year stint working in local television. In addition to his work with Barrett Media, he is a radio and TV play-by-play broadcaster. Reach out to him at Garrett@BarrettMedia.com.
